Your Signature Assignment Paper is due this week. The purpose of this assignment

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We have qualified writers to help you.

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Your Signature Assignment Paper is due this week.
The purpose of this assignment

Your Signature Assignment Paper is due this week.
The purpose of this assignment is to draft and submit a complete, organized, detailed research paper in APA format with sources cited and referenced accurately. You are expected to present a complete research paper that meets all of the original assignment criteria.
Signature Assignment
Contemporary psychology has become highly diversified. Many perspectives have been adopted for the study of psychology. Each of these perspectives sees behavior and experience in a unique way that frequently contradicts other highly regarded perspectives.
For this assignment, review the text to discover more about the seven perspectives of psychology (neuroscience, evolutionary, behavior genetics, psychodynamic, behavioral, cognitive, and social-cultural). This is based on your interpretation of the academic material. Rely on your own words and your interpretation of the material for this assignment. Although direct quotes may be used, do so sparingly. Your instructor will want to know how you define the terms, perspectives, and ideas. Keep in mind that you still give credit to your source when paraphrasing the main ideas.
Describe each of these perspectives include a minimum of one peer-reviewed article or text reference for each perspective.
Select any two perspectives and identify similarities and conflicting viewpoints. How do these perspectives differ from the others? What are some common viewpoints in the perspectives?
Select one of the following psychological disorders: substance use disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), major depressive, and generalized anxiety. Identify which perspective would be most beneficial in understanding and treating the disorder. Provide supporting evidence using critical thinking from the course content, readings, and academic peer-reviewed sources
IMPORTANT
Use APA Style to format your paper and cite your sources, including your text. Include a title and reference page. Review the rubric for more information on how your assignment will be graded.
Review the Evaluating Resources activity from earlier in the course on how to evaluate and identify appropriate resources for the assignment.
The final paper should be 5 to 7 pages.
Due: Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time)
Points: 200
Rubric
PSYC_160_OL – PSYC 160 Signature Assignment Rubric
PSYC_160_OL – PSYC 160 Signature Assignment Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplanation of Issues
32 to >28.48 ptsMeets or Exceeds Expectations
Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated clearly and described comprehensively, delivering all relevant information necessary for full understanding.
28.48 to >24.0 ptsMostly Meets Expectations
Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated, described, and clarified so that understanding is not seriously impeded by omissions.
24 to >18.88 ptsBelow Expectations
Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated but description leaves some terms undefined, ambiguities unexplored, boundaries undetermined, and/or backgrounds unknown.
18.88 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Issue/problem to be considered critically is state without clarification or description.
32 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence (Selecting and using information to investigate a point of view or conclusion).
32 to >28.48 ptsMeets or Exceeds Expectations
Information is taken from source(s) with enough interpretation/ evaluation to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis. Viewpoints of experts are questioned thoroughly.
28.48 to >24.0 ptsMostly Meets Expectations
Information is taken from source(s) with enough interpretation/ evaluation to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Viewpoints of experts are subject to questioning.
24 to >18.88 ptsBelow Expectations
Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/ evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Viewpoints of experts are taken as mostly fact, with little questioning.
18.88 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/ evaluation. Viewpoints of experts are taken as fact, without question.
32 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInfluence of Context and Assumptions
32 to >28.48 ptsMeets or Exceeds Expectations
Thoroughly (systematically and methodically) analyzes own and others’ assumptions and carefully evaluates the relevance of contexts when presenting a position. Able to clearly connect and explore issue(s) to real-world problems/ solutions.
28.48 to >24.0 ptsMostly Meets Expectations
Identifies own and others’ assumptions and several relevant contexts when presenting a position. Lists real-world problems/ solutions, but does not clearly connect contexts.
24 to >18.88 ptsBelow Expectations
Questions some assumptions. Identifies several relevant contexts when presenting a position. May be more aware of others’ assumptions than one’s own (or vice-versa). Lists real-world problems/ solutions, but does not connect contexts.
18.88 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Shows an emerging awareness of present assumptions (rarely labels assertions as assumptions). Rarely identifies contexts when presenting a position. Does not connect issues to real-world problems/ solutions.
32 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStudent’s Position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis)
32 to >28.48 ptsMeets or Exceeds Expectations
Specific position (perspective, thesis/ hypothesis) is imaginative, taking into account the complexities of an issue. Limits of position (perspective, thesis/ hypothesis) are acknowledged. Other’s points of view are synthesized within position (perspective, thesis/ hypothesis).
28.48 to >24.0 ptsMostly Meets Expectations
Specific position (perspective, thesis/ hypothesis) takes into account the complexities of an issue. Others’ points of view are acknowledged within position (perspective, thesis/ hypothesis).
24 to >18.88 ptsBelow Expectations
Specific position (perspective, thesis/ hypothesis) acknowledges different sides of the issue.
18.88 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Specific position (perspective, thesis/ hypothesis) is stated, but is simplistic and obvious.
32 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusions and Related Outcomes (implications and consequences)
32 to >28.48 ptsMeets or Exceeds Expectations
Conclusions and related outcomes (consequences and implications) are logical and reflect student’s informed evaluation and ability to place evidence and perspective discussed in priority order.
28.48 to >24.0 ptsMostly Meets Expectations
Conclusion is logically tied to a range of information, including opposing viewpoints; related outcomes (consequences and implications) are clearly identified.
24 to >18.88 ptsBelow Expectations
Conclusion is logically tied to information (because information is chosen to fit the desired conclusion); some related outcomes (consequences and implications) may be inferred but not clearly identified.
18.88 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Conclusion is inconsistently tied to some of the information discussed; related outcomes (consequences and implications) are oversimplified.
32 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics
20 to >17.8 ptsMeets or Exceeds Expectations
The writing demonstrates sophisticated clarity and conciseness and is extremely well organized. Punctuation, spelling, and capitalization are all correct with minimal to no errors.
17.8 to >15.0 ptsMostly Meets Expectations
The writing is clear, concise, and well organized. May contain a few punctuation, spelling, or capitalization errors.
15 to >11.8 ptsBelow Expectations
The writing lacks clarity, conciseness, or organization. Several errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization detract from the readability of the paper.
11.8 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
The writing is unfocused and poorly organized. Many errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization detract from the readability of the paper.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources and APA
20 to >17.8 ptsMeets or Exceeds Expectations
Uses APA Style accurately and consistently to cite sources without errors. Meets length and formatting requirements of the assignment. The required number of relevant audience-appropriate sources have been expertly cited and integrated into the content to support ideas.
17.8 to >15.0 ptsMostly Meets Expectations
APA Style is used with few citation errors. Meets most length and formatting requirements of the assignment. Reputable audience-appropriate sources have been included but may not be well integrated. The source content minimally supports ideas.
15 to >11.8 ptsBelow Expectations
Reflects incomplete knowledge of APA Style with many errors. Meets few length and formatting requirements of the assignment. At least one source is used but is not cited properly, is not reputable, or is inappropriate for the audience or topic. The source does not support ideas.
11.8 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Does not use APA style; there are pervasive errors throughout the paper. Does not meet length or formatting requirements of the assignment. Sources are not provided.

Click Here To Order Now!

Related

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount