Why Should Anyone Be Led by You? by Goffee & Jones

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Table of Contents

The problem discussed in the research Why Should Anyone Be Led by You?
The hypothesis (es) formulated by the authors in the article
The need for the study in the article
The methodology used by the writers
Summary of review of the literature on the problem in the article
The study’s assumptions, limitations, and potential for future research
Conclusion
Student team’s critique of the article
Reference

The problem discussed in the research Why Should Anyone Be Led by You?

The article under investigation is written by Robert Goffee and Gareth Jones and is called Why Should Anyone Be Led by You?. The paper is devoted to the very topical issue of leadership which is discussed nowadays by various scientists and sociologists. Resting on the great importance of the given issue in terms of human resource management and organization of business, Goffee and Jones suggest their cogitations about some very important aspects of the given sphere and the impact it might have on the company or any other organization.

The authors have been investigating the question of leadership for about twenty years and they tend to present their ideas and cogitations connected with it, also suggesting a sort of discussion. They tend to show the fact that a leader should have certain qualities that might help him/her.

With this in mind, it is possible to say that the main problem discussed in the given paper is the attitude towards the issue of leadership and its main concepts. To discuss the given problem better, the authors use some additional information and presents various hypotheses connected with for a reader to be able to analyze the given sphere and obtain a clear vision of one of the most important questions of modern society.

The hypothesis (es) formulated by the authors in the article

The authors of the given article revolve around several important hypotheses suggested by them. First of all, they suggest the idea that there are some other qualities except the traditional ones that a good leader might have. Goffee and Jones introduce four main spheres in which the influence of a leader could become the most significant. Thus. according to the given paper, a leader could show his/her weakness, rely on their intuition, manage employees with the help of empathy and reveal their differences (Goffee & Jones, 2000).

Nevertheless, having outlined the above-mentioned four qualities, the authors also formulate another hypothesis. They underline the fact that even if a person realizes the necessity of the development of these qualities and accepts the perspective which states that they are necessary for a good leader, he/she still might fail as there is a great need for action. Goffee and Jones (2000) state the fact that business books do not have the universal recipe which could help to become a good leader in a short period without any action. The given statement is introduced by the authors to underline the necessity of the constant development of a good leader and his/her actions aimed at the improvement of leadership qualities.

The need for the study in the article

The authors of the given article tend to suggest their cogitations connected with the issue of leadership. That is why, to make their research credible and informative, Goffee and Jones (2000) underline the fact that the article could be taken as the result of their twenty-year research devoted to the main concepts of leadership and the impact it might have on the development of various companies or organizations. The hypotheses formulated by the authors come from this very research.

Moreover, in the course of the paper, Goffee and Jones (2000) underline the fact that belonging to the business world, they will not stop the investigation of the given issue and they plan to continue their investigation. It means that the new study is planned by the authors to investigate the issue of leadership and suggest new concepts. Additionally, the authors also use the studies of some other scientists who also work in the given sphere. Thus, they compare some conventional approaches to the issue of leadership with their own and try to conclude, outlining the key points of difference for a reader to be able to understand their approach. It should be said that Goffee and Jones manage to provide some credible and important studies that help the whole article to be more persuasive and clear.

The methodology used by the writers

Analyzing the given paper, it should be said that the authors of the given work use various methods. First of all, they present readers with some factual information connected with the sphere of leadership and the role which a good leader should play in the collective or a company. The paper is organized in the way which helps to introduce the most important data most efficiently and, that is why the first paragraphs serve as the sort of introduction presenting the authors point of view. However, the authors also present some important theoretical information connected with the given sphere.

That is why they use various scientific sources to gather the data and reconsider them in terms of their investigation. The analysis of the sources also helps them to obtain a clear vision of the perspective respected by society and create their approach resting on the main ideas and concepts. Finally, Goffee and Jones (2000) also provide the results of their previous investigations which remain unknown to a common reader. However, this very fact helps to understand that the given paper is the part of a greater project which is organized following all modern requirements and using the most efficient methods.

Summary of review of the literature on the problem in the article

As has already been stated, the given paper is part of the great project conducted by certain researchers. That is why it is obvious that in their investigation they use the assumptions and ideas of various scientists who also work with the sphere of leadership. Thus, one realizes the fact that investigating the sphere of leadership, the authors are not able to avoid usage of some traditional sources and scientists who determined the main concepts and created approaches that are widely used nowadays. However, in the course of the paper, the authors almost do not refer to some other scientists, preferring to suggest their ideas and revolve around the concepts created by them.

With this in mind, it is possible to conclude that the given work is the result of the deep investigation of various sources and ideas of other writers which helped Goffee and Jones to structure them and create their approach. Finally, it is also possible to say that the traditional sources combined with the authors point of view on the given issue and the ideas of various scientists were used while creating the given paper and outlining the most important concepts connected with the sphere of leadership and its impact on people.

The study’s assumptions, limitations, and potential for future research

The authors of the given paper assume that leadership is an integral part of the modern world and, that is why a great deal of attention should be given to it. Thus, the paper suggests the idea that if a person wants people to follow him/her, he/she should be ready to ask some questions and move to evolve and create some new conditions. Moreover, Goffee and Jones also revolve around four qualities that should be peculiar to a good leader.

Analyzing the given ideas, it is possible to state the fact that the given work has great potential for its further development. The fact is that the sphere of leadership is very topical nowadays and one could predict the further growth of the level of interest towards the given issue. With this in mind, there will also be the demand for research like this one as they could help to improve leadership qualities and contribute to the development of an organization or company. Moreover, the great credit of the given paper and the research work performed by scientists introduces various possibilities for the further evolution of the given project. It is possible to predict the further development of the project and new papers which revolve around the sphere of leadership.

Conclusion

With this in mind, it is possible to make a certain conclusion. The given article could be taken as a credible source that presents clear and detailed information connected with the question of leadership and its main concepts. Goffee and Jones manage to present the information in a way that helps a reader to understand the main ideas and accept the hypothesis suggested by the authors. Moreover, the four qualities of a leader suggested by them could help to understand the main tasks of a leader better and help to improve some personal traits. Finally, the paper has a big potential for its further development and could be used by various scientists in their investigations connected with the given sphere.

Student team’s critique of the article

Having read the given article, it is vital to outline several points that could be taken as the most important. First of all, one should admit the manner of the presentation of the material. The authors manage to show their hypotheses and ideas in a very clear and understandable way and even a common reader could get them. Moreover, the information presented in the paper is also very interesting and important as it helps to reconsider some traditional approaches to leadership and obtain new perspectives. The authors present some additional data connected with the gender peculiarities of the sphere of leadership and its scientific basis which makes the work more credible and informative.

However, the absence of statistics or a certain experiment or study to support the authors’ assumptions could be taken as the great drawback of the paper. The authors do not refer to some other research articles or works of other scientists and, that is why a reader might doubt the rightness of their position and topicality of the suggested point of view. Therefore, the study conducted based on the information provided by the authors might help it to become more significant and contribute to the development of the whole project. With this in mind, it is possible to conclude that the given paper has some drawbacks thus it remains rather credible and informative.

Reference

Goffee, R., & Jones, G. (2000). Why should anyone be led by you?. Harvard Business Review, 51-58. Web.

Click Here To Order Now!