Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
What are the Two Best Practices Utilized in Developing Treatment Agencies for th
What are the Two Best Practices Utilized in Developing Treatment Agencies for the Homeless
use the information below to answer the question above
Overview
Even the most focused research question may contain within it a series of more fundamental and related questions. Once these are determined, the researcher must then determine the kinds of information necessary to answer them. In this assignment, you will identify how you would conduct your study of the best practice model you proposed earlier in the quarter. From there identify a series of evaluation questions which you would propose as an evaluation design. You will also begin to identify the kinds of data you will need, from whom you will gather it, and which methods you will apply to your proposed study.
For your research questions, identify what type of data you will collect in order to address your research question. You will be answering these questions:
Who will your participants be?
Is the data quantitative or qualitative in nature—should it be in the form of numbers or words?
What methods might you apply to glean the information that you seek?
What instruments, measures, or tools would you use in your study?
Also, identify how you would analyze the data that you collect. Will you be conducting statistical analyses of any kind? Or, will you be using coding and categorizing? Will you be using any computer software to assist with the analysis?
Finally, consider the results of the study. Who should know about these results? How will you present them?
By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following EPAS and practice behaviors:
C4: Engage In Practice-informed Research and Research-informed Practice
C4.GP.B Apply critical thinking to engage in analysis of quantitative and qualitative research methods and research findings.
Instructions
Include the following components in your paper:
Research QuestionRestate your overarching research question.
Evaluate critical sub-questions related to a primary research question. In other words, what questions require answers in order to address the primary question?
ParticipantsPropose a relevant pool of participants.
DataJustify data sources (artifacts, literature, et cetera) relevant to a given research problem. Are you seeking information represented by numbers or words? Stated differently, are you interested in quantitative, qualitative data, or both? Describe these.
Data CollectionAnalyze contextually appropriate data-collection tools.
Data InterpretationEvaluate the approach to relevant data interpretation. Be sure to explain why you have selected this approach. Consider whether you will use any computer software or programs to assist with the data analysis.
Audience and MediumAssess the appropriate audience and medium for final data analysis. Include how you propose to present them and what format would be most appropriate to communicate your results to your audience.
Additional Requirements
The assignment you submit is expected to meet the following requirements:
Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current Evidence and APALinks to an external site. standards.
Length of paper: 3–4 double-spaced pages.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
Due date: Assignment must be submitted to your instructor in the courseroom no later than 11:59 p.m. on Sunday of this week.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Use practice experience and theory to inform scientific inquiry and research. (C4.GP.A)Evaluate critical sub-questions related to a primary research question. (C4.GP.B)
Propose a relevant pool of participants. (C4.GP.B)
Justify data sources (artifacts, literature, et cetera) relevant to a given research problem. (C4.GP.B)
Analyze contextually appropriate data-collection tools. (C4.GP.B)
Competency 2: Apply critical thinking to engage in analysis of quantitative and qualitative research methods and research findings. (C4.GP.B)Evaluate the approach to relevant data interpretation. (C4.GP.B)
Competency 3: Use and translate research evidence to inform and improve practice, policy, and service delivery.(C4.GP.C)Assess the appropriate audience for final data analysis. (C4.GP.B)
Competency 4: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.
View Rubric
Week 8 Assignment – Data Collection and Analysis
Week 8 Assignment – Data Collection and Analysis
CriteriaRatingsPts
Evaluate critical sub-questions related to a primary research question. (C4.GP.B)view longer description
28 to >23.8 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Evaluates critical sub-questions related to a primary research question, fully supporting all claims with references to relevant, scholarly literature.23.8 to >19.6 pts
PROFICIENT
Evaluates critical sub-questions related to a primary research question.19.6 to >0 pts
BASIC
Identifies but does not evaluate potentially critical sub-questions related to a primary research question.0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not identify potentially critical sub-questions related to a primary research question./ 28 pts
Propose a relevant pool of participants. (C4.GP.B)
view longer description
28 to >23.8 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Proposes a relevant pool of participants, fully supporting all claims with references to relevant, scholarly literature.23.8 to >19.6 pts
PROFICIENT
Proposes a relevant pool of participants.19.6 to >0 pts
BASIC
Suggests a possibly relevant pool of participants, but does not provide sufficient justification.0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not suggest a possibly relevant pool of participants./ 28 pts
Justify data sources (artifacts, literature, et cetera) relevant to a given research problem. (C4.GP.B)
view longer description
28 to >23.8 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Justifies data sources (artifacts, literature, et cetera) relevant to a given research problem, fully supporting all claims with references to relevant, scholarly literature.23.8 to >19.6 pts
PROFICIENT
Justifies data sources (artifacts, literature, et cetera) relevant to a given research problem.19.6 to >0 pts
BASIC
Identifies but does not justify data sources (artifacts, literature, et cetera) relevant to a given research problem.0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not identify data sources (artifacts, literature, et cetera) relevant to a given research problem./ 28 pts
Analyze contextually appropriate data-collection tools. (C4.GP.B)
view longer description
28 to >23.8 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Analyzes contextually appropriate data-collection tools, fully supporting all claims with references to relevant, scholarly literature.23.8 to >19.6 pts
PROFICIENT
Analyzes contextually appropriate data-collection tools.19.6 to >0 pts
BASIC
Identifies but does not analyze contextually appropriate data-collection tools.0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not identify contextually appropriate data-collection tools./ 28 pts
Evaluate the approach to relevant data interpretation. (C4.GP.B)
view longer description
30 to >25.5 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Evaluates the approach to relevant data interpretation and provides insightful examples connected to professional practice.25.5 to >21 pts
PROFICIENT
Evaluates the approach to relevant data interpretation.21 to >0 pts
BASIC
Describes but does not evaluate the approach to relevant data interpretation.0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not describe the approach to relevant data interpretation./ 30 pts
Assess the appropriate audience for final data analysis. (C4.GP.B )
view longer description
30 to >25.5 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Assesses the appropriate audience for final data analysis and provides insightful examples connected to professional practice.25.5 to >21 pts
PROFICIENT
Assesses the appropriate audience for final data analysis.21 to >0 pts
BASIC
Identifies but does not assess the appropriate audience for final data analysis.0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not identify the appropriate audience for final data analysis./ 30 pts
Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.
view longer description
28 to >23.8 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Communicates with exceptional clarity in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.23.8 to >19.6 pts
PROFICIENT
Communicates in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.19.6 to >0 pts
BASIC
Communicates in a manner that is scholarly and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Communicates in a manner that is not consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession./ 28 pts
Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount