Water Pollution of New York City Rivers

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!

Introduction

Water pollution has become a significant concern because it adversely affects plants, humans, and animals. River pollution is caused by a wide variety of factors, but combined sewerage overflows (CSOs) are the main source of contamination in New York City Rivers (Wang 1373). Combined sewer systems are used to transport stormwater, domestic sewage, and industrial wastewater to treatment plants (Wang 1373). During heavy rainfalls, wastewater treatment companies might discharge excess untreated effluents into rivers, leading to pollution (Wang 1373). Therefore, it is imperative to evaluate the effects of CSOs on river water quality.

Objective

The aim of the analysis was to assess the effects of CSOs on water quality and the environment for different sites along the Harlem River.

Results

Data

The water quality parameters (Enterococcus, Temperature, Salinity, Chlorophyll, Turbidity, Oxygen) in Harlem River Willis Ave Bridge and Harlem River Washington Bridge sites were compared during the analysis. Data was collected from and recorded in Tables 1 and 2 for Harlem River Willis Ave Bridge and Harlem River Washington Bridge sites, respectively.

Table 1. Water quality parameters for Harlem River Willis Ave Bridge.

Sample Date Enterococcus Count Quality Temperature (0F) Salinity Chlorophyll Turbidity Oxygen
10/08/2019 185 Beach Advisory 67.7 22.9 1.5 2 74
09/10/2019 <10 Acceptable 73.1 21.2 2.5 3 70
08/06/2019 20 Acceptable 74.8 23.2 1.6 6 48
07/09/2019 <10 Acceptable 71.2 22 1.3 7 64
06/04/2019 288 Beach Advisory 63.7 12.2 1.5 24 78
05/07/2019 96 Beach Advisory 55 12 1.8 28 84
10/10/2018 10 Acceptable 70.6 6.2 2.2 17 75
09/10/2018 465 Beach Advisory 73.9 22.4 1.8 6 66
08/14/2018 414 Beach Advisory 76.6 20.3 1.4 13 46
07/17/2018 30 Acceptable 77.2 17.8 4.1 9 68
06/13/2018 <10 Acceptable 67.4 15.4 8.2 11 95
05/06/2018 20 Acceptable 53.5 13.4 4.5 15 93
10/16/2017 10 Acceptable 68.4 20.3 1.8 4 75
09/11/2017 <10 Acceptable 69.6 22.7 1.8 8 70
08/14/2017 <10 Acceptable 74.7 22.5 2.1 7 56
07/10/2017 52 Acceptable 73.1 13.5 1.2 16 75
06/12/2017 10 Acceptable 66.8 13.8 1.5 17 79

Table 2. Water quality parameters for Harlem River Washington Bridge.

Sample Date Enterococcus Count Quality Temperature (f) Salinity Chlorophyll Turbidity Oxygen
10/08/2019 226 Beach Advisory 67.7 21 1.3 6 72
09/10/2019 31 Acceptable 73.3 18.3 1.4 10 64
08/06/2019 31 Acceptable 76.6 20.4 1.6 9 49
07/09/2019 31 Acceptable 72.7 20.2 1.5 10 66
06/04/2019 75 Beach Advisory 64.9 7.6 1.8 31 83
05/07/2019 20 Acceptable 56.3 4.3 2 49 90
10/10/2018 30 Acceptable 70.8 5 2.4 21 76
09/10/2018 327 Beach Advisory 74.7 14.6 1.9 19 65
08/14/2018 62 Beach Advisory 81 8.1 2.9 20 64
07/17/2018 >24196 Beach Advisory 77.8 12.4 3.8 20 76
06/13/2018 <10 Acceptable 67.9 12.4 13.9 23 103
05/06/2018 10 Acceptable 55.2 2.7 2.2 39 99
10/16/2017 31 Acceptable 69 16.5 1.6 12 75
09/11/2017 10 Acceptable 70.2 14.8 2 11 75
08/14/2017 <10 Acceptable 75.5 19.3 2.1 8 60
07/10/2017 <10 Acceptable 73.9 9.5 1.5 17 83
06/12/2017 <10 Acceptable 68.1 4.9 2 36 87

Graphs

The data was then plotted into Enterococcus Count vs. Date, Temp vs. Date, Salinity vs. Date, Chlorophyll vs. Date, Turbidity vs. Date Oxygen vs. Date, for the two datasets, and a comparison between the sites made. Therefore, 12 graphs were developed at the end of the analysis.

Enterococcus Count vs. Date for the Harlem River Willis Ave Bridge Dataset.
Figure 1. Enterococcus Count vs. Date for the Harlem River Willis Ave Bridge Dataset.
Enterococcus Count vs. Date for the Harlem River Washington Bridge Dataset.
Figure 2. Enterococcus Count vs. Date for the Harlem River Washington Bridge Dataset.
Temperature vs. Date for the Harlem River Willis Ave Bridge Dataset.
Figure 3. Temperature vs. Date for the Harlem River Willis Ave Bridge Dataset.
Temperature vs. Date for the Harlem River Washington Bridge Dataset.
Figure 4. Temperature vs. Date for the Harlem River Washington Bridge Dataset.
Salinity vs. Date for the Harlem River Willis Ave Bridge Dataset.
Figure 5. Salinity vs. Date for the Harlem River Willis Ave Bridge Dataset.
Salinity vs. Date for the Harlem River Washington Bridge Dataset.
Figure 6. Salinity vs. Date for the Harlem River Washington Bridge Dataset.
Chlorophyll vs. Date for the Harlem River Willis Ave Bridge Dataset.
Figure 7. Chlorophyll vs. Date for the Harlem River Willis Ave Bridge Dataset.
Chlorophyll vs. Date for the Harlem River Washington Bridge Dataset.
Figure 8. Chlorophyll vs. Date for the Harlem River Washington Bridge Dataset.
Turbidity vs. Date for the Harlem River Willis Ave Bridge Dataset.
Figure 9. Turbidity vs. Date for the Harlem River Willis Ave Bridge Dataset.
Turbidity vs. Date for the Harlem River Washington Bridge Dataset.
Figure 10. Turbidity vs. Date for the Harlem River Washington Bridge Dataset.
Oxygen Level vs. Date for the Harlem River Willis Ave Bridge Dataset.
Figure 11. Oxygen Level vs. Date for the Harlem River Willis Ave Bridge Dataset.
Oxygen Level vs. Date for the Harlem River Washington Bridge Dataset.
Figure 12. Oxygen Level vs. Date for the Harlem River Washington Bridge Dataset.

Comparison

The datasets from the two sites (Harlem River Willis Ave Bridge and Harlem River Washington Bridge) were compared to determine the quality of water and impact of CSOs in these two sites from 06/12/2017 to 10/08/2019. It was found that the Enterococcus count for the two sites keeps varying, probably due to the rainy seasons or the introduction of wastewater. Notable loads were noted for Harlem River Willis Ave Bridge on 10/08/2019, 06/04/2019, 09/10/2018, and 08/14/2018. For Harlem River Washington Bridge, significant quantities were recorded on 10/08/2019 and 09/10/2018, and on 07/17/2018, the highest value >24196 was noted. For both cases, the quantities of Enterococcus are acceptable, but in some instances, the levels are too high, necessitating beach advisory. Harlem River Willis Ave Bridge is more affected than Harlem River Washington Bridge. Enterococcus count is the indicator of sewage contamination. The values indicate the rivers are contaminated, and the quantities reach unacceptable levels, probably during rainy seasons, which might be caused by CSOs.

The water temperature for the two sites varied for the time considered. The highest values were recorded were 77.2 0F for Harlem River Willis Ave Bridge on 07/17/201 and 810F for the Harlem River Washington Bridge on 08/14/2018. The temperature changes might be attributed to weather but not to the impact of CSOs.

The salinity levels increase and decrease across the selected time frame, following a similar trend for the two sites. The Harlem River Willis Ave Bridge has higher salinity values than the Harlem River Washington Bridge. Higher levels of salinity might have adverse impacts on the health of aquatic organisms, plants, animals, and humans.

The chlorophyll levels remain below a value of 2 for most of the months. The highest values were recorded on 06/13/2018 for both sites. The concentration of chlorophyll is associated with algae living in the water and indicates high levels of nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorous that might be introduced rainwater flowing from agricultural fields.

Turbidity changes across the selected time for the two sites. The highest value was recorded on 05/07/2019, with the Harlem River Washington Bridge having greater quantities. It is a measure of the amount of particles in a water sample, and it impacts the aquatic organisms by preventing the amount of sunlight.

The changes in oxygen level trend follow the same pattern for the two sites, but Harlem River Washington Bridge has higher values than the Harlem River Willis Ave Bridge site. The oxygen level indicates the biological activities, and it should be almost in equilibrium with atmospheric levels.

Conclusion

Combined sewer overflows are known to contain water sources. In this context, the water quality for Harlem River Willis Ave Bridge and Harlem River Washington Bridge sites were compared. The water quality parameters considered were temperature, eenterococcus, salinity, turbidity, chlorophyll, and oxygen. It was found that the values of the parameters vary with time. Hence, it can be concluded that the changes are caused by rainy seasons. Substantial qualities of Enterococcus were observed, and in some instances at unacceptable levels. Overall, CSOs affect the water quality at the selected sites (Harlem River Willis Ave Bridge and Harlem River Washington Bridge).

Work Cited

Wang, Jingyu. Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs) Impact on Water Quality and Environmental Ecosystem in the Harlem River. Journal of Environmental Protection, vol.5, no.13, 2014, pp.1373-1389.

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!