Transformational Leadership Article by Salim & Rajput

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Introduction

The authors focus on the investigation of transformational leadership, its impact on the work of organizations, and how it can shape organizations to help to achieve existing goals. The introductory section clearly identifies the necessity to analyze this issue because of its critical importance for modern units as the organizational performance and prosocial behaviors might be modified by various leadership styles and create the basis for the following improvement. Under these conditions, the research paper focuses on the relevant and significant question that should be discussed to attain a better vision of transformational leadership and its role in organizations.

Research Topic

The title of the paper clearly defines the research topic and the area of discussion. The authors focus on the factors influencing the work of units, employees, and outcomes. They say that that paper is devoted to “identifying the antecedents and factors influencing organizations’ performance efficiently and productively.” This statement creates the basis for the discussion and further investigation. The researchers evaluate the three major concepts, such as transformational leadership, prosocial behavioral intentions, and organizational performance, to find whether they correlate and how they can be improved by applying specific methods. The choice of the research topic is clear and is linked to modern trends, which increases the practical utility and relevance of the paper.

Purpose, Research Methods

Salim and Rajput (2020) formulate the pivotal aim of the paper to explain the choice of methods and central objectives. They state that the main purpose is “to analyze the relationship between transformational leadership, prosocial behavioral intentions, and organizational performance.” It also influences the objective of the paper, which is to determine the correlation between the three outline concepts among full-time academics from universities and colleges in Oman. Considering these two central assumptions, the authors also conducted a literature review that helped to narrow the research topic and be more focused. Using the collected data, purpose, and objectives, they formulated the following hypotheses:

H1: There is no significant contribution to transformational leadership and prosocial behavioral Intentions
H2: There is no significant contribution to transformational leadership and organizational performance
H3: There is no significant contribution to prosocial behavioral intentions and organizational performance

To prove or refute these assumptions, the authors collected data among 322 respondents using three sets of structured questionnaires. It helped to collect relevant information and make conclusions.

Conclusions

The authors state that the study proves the relationship between transformational leadership, prosocial behavior intentions, and organization performance among full-time academics from universities and colleges in Oman. Using the results of the research, they emphasize that factors of transformational leadership are critical for the work of organizations and should be considered when trying to promote positive change and attain the desired goals. The conclusions are linked to the data collected during the research, literature review, and the hypotheses, which increases their credibility and practical utility.

Abstract

The paper has an abstract which leads to a better understanding of the study’s focus and nature. The authors introduce the three major concepts that would be investigated during the research and the setting. It results in an improved vision of the article and readers’ expectations. The abstract also contains the purpose of the paper, its objective, hypothesis, and a brief discussion of the methodology used to either prove or refute the central assumptions. Finally, the investigators outline the gap in the literature and how they plan to fill it. For this reason, the abstract correctly represents the article, offers the keywords, and helps to acquire an improved vision of the paper, its goals, and central ideas.

Literature Review

The analyzed paper also contains a literature review section. The authors use this data collection and research tool to create the theoretical background for their research. It has three major parts devoted to the concepts selected for the analysis, which are transformational leadership, prosocial behavioral intentions, and organizational performance. Reviewing other researchers’ works, the authors explain the choice of the research topic and its relevance for modern organizations. They outline that numerous other studies prove the positive impact of transformational leadership on multiple aspects of companies’ performance, which is vital for discussion. At the same time, the literature review helps to find the existing gap in knowledge as the authors notice a limited number of studies trying to determine the correlation between transformational leadership and other variables linked to organizational behavior. It means that there is a need for further research that would help to eliminate the deficit of data related to this aspect. The literature review also helps to formulate the central hypotheses and objectives of the study. The authors used only pertinent, relevant, and credible sources, which contributed to the increased trustworthiness of the research.

Methodology

The authors devote much attention to the description of the methodology used to reach central objectives and discuss the formulated hypotheses. They do not clearly identify whether qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods or used; instead, they describe data collection and analysis methods. Three sets of structured questionnaires were employed by the researchers to work with the participants and acquire credible information. There is also a detailed description of the sample consisting of 322 respondents from various academics and colleges in Oman. Participants were selected using a multi-stage sampling technique. They had an opportunity to use online forms or take part in a hardcopy survey. This approach seems sufficient regarding the purpose of the paper, major hypotheses, and objectives. The data collected in this way was discussed and interpreted using scales offered by other researchers, which resulted in better structuring, representation, and discussion.

Discussion

The authors also discuss the acquired results to formulate clear conclusions. Using the data from the research, they discuss the correlation between the three major elements, such as transformational leadership, prosocial behavioral intentions, and organizational performance and their impact on units. They avoid overemphasizing or underemphasizing some ideas or statements. Instead, the researchers focus on aspects critical for the study. They discuss the information regarding the hypotheses and objectives, which helps to avoid unnecessary premises or cogitations. Furthermore, the authors emphasize that all three null hypotheses were rejected, meaning that there is a positive correlation between the outlined aspects. However, this section could be expanded as it contains little information about how different results impacted the hypothesis and its applicability for the research. In general, it is possible to follow the author’s logic and agree with their results’ interpretation and discussion.

Clarity of Statements and Assumptions

Analyzing the article, it is also possible to state that the authors avoid vague statements or unclear assumptions. They formulate their ideas in an understandable way supported by data acquired from credible sources or during the research. For instance, they assume that “factors of transformational leadership and organizational performance are highly significant as it impacts the success or failure of an organization.” This summarizing idea is given at the end of the paper in the conclusion section and rests on the previous investigation and other statements made by the authors. Moreover, there is credible numerical evidence supporting this conclusion. It means that most authors’ premises can be trusted, and they are clear and grounded. It contributes to the increased practical value of the paper. It can be used in similar research to show how transformational leadership and other variables might influence an organization and its performance.

Conclusion

Altogether, the authors revolve around the underlying assumption that transformational leadership plays a fundamental role in the work of modern organizations as it is correlated with other important variables, such as performance and behavior. This idea is proven in the course of the research by using data from respondents and a literature review. The research helped to fill the gap in the literature untouched by previous investigators and created the basis for new investigations. The given paper is critically important for the field as it contributes to a better understanding of the role leadership plays in organizations today and outlines methods that can be used to boost performance and achieve existing goals. The authors use effective data collection and processing tools to explain their position and ensure no critical flaws can corrupt findings. For this reason, the research article can be recommended for use in future investigations or to enhance the understanding of leadership and how it influences organizations today.

Reference

Salim, A., & Rajput, N. (2020). The relationship between transformational leadership, prosocial behavioral intentions, and organizational performance. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(1), 487-493. doi10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no1.487

Click Here To Order Now!