Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
Interpretation and understanding of truth is a very ambiguous thing. Everyone has their own unique opinion regarding what is true and what is false. The reason is that language is not a perfect instrument for communication. The language is limited because we can only hear the words. When people listen to something, they try to imagine or visualize, or even feel the event being told. But the problem is that a person can never truly understand or feel something unless he tries it. One can read about astronauts landing on Moon but will never know what it feels like to be on Moon. The same principle can be applied to war. It is almost impossible to truly describe how it feels to be a soldier in a real war. In his book The Things They Carried, Tim OBrien described the events during his times in Vietnam during the war. The author tries to reveal the truth about the war by creating a mixture of fictional stories and real facts.
Confusion regarding the real and fictional origins of the story shows the reader that it is impossible to fully understand and feel the wars reality. The author intentionally contradicts himself about the reality of the stories being told. When describing the death of Curt Lemon, the author highlights the storys reality by saying that its all exactly true (OBrien 77). However, when narrating the same story, the author mentions that he already told the story many times, many versions (OBrien 85). Also, some characters confess that they invented minor parts of their stories. Sanders says, I had to make up a few things, The glee club. There wasnt any glee club (OBrien 84). Such controversy makes the reader lose trust in the real origins of the stories by characters in the book. The difficulty in distinguishing the truth is the attempt of the author to show another truth about the war. The truth lies in the impossibility of knowing the reality of the war in absolute terms (Calloway 249). This way, the book opens for a reader one of the truths about the war.
How to Tell a True War Story is a hint for a reader saying that the stories in the book are true, even though not a fact. The chapter is an analysis of the relationship between the storytelling and the experience of the war. In any war story, but especially a true one, its difficult to separate what happened from what seemed to happen (OBrien 69). It gives readers a hint that some parts of the stories might not be true, but it changes the books truth. Also, the importance of the stories is that they are given in segments (Calloway 253). The stories of the chapter are interconnected with other chapters, showing that the message of How to Tell a True War Story is applied to other chapters as well. Hence, the author states that even though not all the stories are real throughout the book, it does not mean that the stories are not true.
The story is a better way of telling the truth about the war than the facts themselves. OBrien suggests that the proper treatment of the truth is storytelling (Wesley 7). In Speaking of Courage, Norman Bowker, telling the story about the smell of their camping place, realizes that this was not a story for Sally Kramer (Timmerman 109). It clearly shows that not everyone wants to listen to everything about war, and some things are better not to be told. Also, Norman Bowker thought that it was not a war for war stories& nobody in town wanted to know about the terrible stink (OBrien 145). These Bowkers thoughts indicate that not every story is the story to be told. Thus, facts about the war are not something that people want to listen to. The world is deaf to the real experience of Norman Bowker, while the stories are & art of telling a true war story (Timmerman 110). Hence, the story delivers much more of the truth about war, translating the war language, which is difficult to understand for a reader, into the peaceful language of a story.
The stories reveal the truth regarding the meaning of Vietnam by showing what Vietnam is not. Even though it is clear that Vietnam in American view is a war, no one knows what kind of war it was. According to Middleton, for OBrien, fiction is the means of conveying the truth about Vietnam (12). The stories show readers that the reality of the war is not as simple as just stating the facts about it. They also make the reader think about the difference between real Vietnam and its representation. Also, in Field Trip, OBrien writes, I wanted to show her Vietnam that kept me awake at night& (175). The author, thus, shows the reader that it is better to go and see Vietnam on your own. Also, a reader understands that Vietnam described in books about the war is not a real Vietnam. By demonstrating how the stories are constructed, the author reveals the fictional origins of the books reality. It allows readers to question and challenge the picture of Vietnam portrayed in the book, thus, narrowing the gap between a reader and a real Vietnam.
The storytellers experience of the war is much more important in shaping the true war than the factual events that happened. The narrator says that a true war story if truly told, makes the stomach believe, and the gut instinct is important in war storytelling (OBrien, 77). It indicates that simple facts or just pure descriptions of war events cannot deliver the true experience, emotions, and feelings that soldiers experienced. The true story should be very impressive so that the readers can feel the situation being described by their own guts. Also, OBrien stated that in a true war story, more important than the historical artifact of what occurred is the significance, or truth, of the experience (King 183). It shows that the real events and the stories based on the events are different. Unlike the factual event, the stories represent the real world full of a wide spectrum of emotions and experiences that a person has been through. Hence, the authors experience regarding the war, which can be better delivered via fictional stories, is much more important and worth writing than the real events.
The interconnection of some facts in the story with facts from real-life convinces readers that the stories are real. The reader can notice that the protagonist and narrator are named Tim OBrien as the books author. Moreover, both fictional and real Tim OBrien are around forty and from Minnesota. Also, an epigraph that states: This book is lovingly dedicated to the men of Alpha Company& (OBrien). It makes supposedly fictional characters of the book sound real (Calloway 250). Throughout the book, a reader is confused and questioning if the characters and events are happening in the past. Even if the stories are not exactly from the authors past, the reader can sense some connection with the real world. The fact that the background of the protagonist and the author are perfectly identical makes the reader assume that the stories in the book are coming from the authors experience, which is very important for a reader to be aware of. Thus, similarities between the real world and the book make it easier for a reader to be convinced that the stories describe the war as it was in reality.
To sum up, Tim OBrien could successfully deliver the atmosphere of war. The authors manipulation of facts and fictional features of the stories allows a reader to sense the war truly. Contradiction about the reality of the stories that occur throughout the book gives a reader a thought that the truth about the war is impossible to understand. Also, the story with its fictional origin is a better way to deliver true war events rather than pure facts. Moreover, the perception of Vietnam from the American perspective is also questioned, giving a reader thinking about what real Vietnam is. In addition, it is more significant for the reader to try to understand the authors experience than just reading the factual events that occurred in his life. Finally, the connection of the books fictional word with a real-world makes readers understand that the stories are accurate in terms of the feeling and emotions, even if some of the parts of it are fictional. Hence, the mixture of fiction and facts makes the book The Things They Carried a true war story.
References
Calloway, Catherine. How to Tell a True War Story : Metafiction in The Things They Carried. Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction, 1995, pp. 249-257.
King, Rosemary. OBriens How to Tell a True War Story. The Explicator, 1999, pp. 182-184.
Middleton, Alexis Turley. A True War Story: Reality and Simulation in the American Literature and Film of the Vietnam War, 2008, Brigham Young U, MA dissertation.
OBrien, Tim. The Things They Carried. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2009.
Timmerman, John H. Tim OBrien and the Art of the True War Story: Night March and Speaking of Courage . Twentieth Century Literature, 2000, pp. 100-114.
Wesley, Marilyn. Truth and Fiction in Tim OBriens If I Die in a Combat Zone and The Things They Carried . College Literature, 2002, pp. 1-18.
Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.