The Risk Factors for Childhood Obesity

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Table of Contents

Introduction
Interventions in the Articles and the PICOT Question
Anticipated Outcomes for the PICOT Question
The Link Between the PICOT Question, the Articles, and the Problem
Conclusion
References

Introduction

As the articles with qualitative research methodology, the studies by Guseman et al. (2019) and Mahajan et al. (2011) are considered. The work by Guseman et al. (2019) can be used as a rationale for the need for appropriate education regarding the risk factors for childhood obesity, which corresponds to the idea of the PICOT question. The study by Mahajan et al. (2011) will be engaged to identify the prevalence of obese children in a particular region to confirm the relevance of the intervention presented in the PICOT question. As the articles with quantitative methodology, the studies by Hall et al. (2013) and Vale et al. (2015) will be involved. The research by Hall et al. (2013) will help identify relevant patterns of weight gain in childhood and adolescence, thus serving as a rationale for the intervention in the PICOT question. The article by Vale et al. (2015) will prove a correlation between obesity status at a young age and high blood pressure, thereby confirming the importance of nursing activities to reduce excess weight in the target population.

Interventions in the Articles and the PICOT Question

In the proposed PICOT question, the target audience is adolescents, and as an intervention, nurse-led health education and physical activity program are offered. Of the four studies, only the article by Hall et al. (2013) includes the same age group, although the authors do not aim to teach but to prove the prevalence of the problem through mathematical calculations. The studies by Mahajan et al. (2011) and Vale et al. (2015) consider the problem of obesity among primary school children and pre-schoolers, respectively, and in both cases, the focus is on medical factors and consequences. Guseman et al. (2019) describe working with senior students and assessing their knowledge regarding the timely screening of childhood obesity, and their study addresses educational interventions indirectly.

Anticipated Outcomes for the PICOT Question

Based on the purpose of the PICOT question, it is expected that the nurse-led intervention will justify its effectiveness and relevance in the context of the stated problem. Engaged adolescents will be able to acquire the necessary knowledge regarding physical activity and healthy eating patterns after participating in the program. In the four articles, the anticipated outcomes partially overlap with the aforementioned ones. Guseman et al. (2019) aim at educating senior students, while Mahajan et al. (2011) want to discuss childhood obesity in public by providing relevant evidence. In the article by Hall et al. (2013), the authors expect similar outcomes to those in the PICOT question under consideration, aiming to create a framework that describes healthy eating and physical activity patterns. Finally, Vale et al. (2015) also consider the role of physical activity, but their objectives are based on identifying the impact of the declared practice change on specific medical indicators.

The Link Between the PICOT Question, the Articles, and the Problem

The main link connecting the considered PICOT question, the articles involved, and the analyzed nursing practice problem is the issue of obesity among young people. The analysis of potentially effective measures to take is also disclosed in all of these research objects. In addition, the PICOT question, the articles, and the problem involve evidence-based interventions, regardless of the work strategy and methods used to test the results.

Conclusion

Based on the information reviewed, as an evidence-based practice change, one can propose to develop and implement a nutrition program for the target population as the most effective tool to prevent obesity risk factors. As Kim and Lim (2019) argue, dietary patterns are closely related to behavioral and environmental aspects that are crucial to consider when designing an intervention to tackle obesity in young people. The analyzed articles confirm the importance of forming the correct eating habits in the target population, and an evidence-based practice change can be based on stimulating such habits.

References

Guseman, E. H., Beverly, E. A., Whipps, J., & Mort, S. (2019). Foundational knowledge regarding childhood obesity: A cross-sectional study of medical students.BMC Public Health, 19(1), 1-7.

Hall, K. D., Butte, N. F., Swinburn, B. A., & Chow, C. C. (2013). Dynamics of childhood growth and obesity: Development and validation of a quantitative mathematical model. The Lancet: Diabetes & Endocrinology, 1(2), 97-105.

Kim, J., & Lim, H. (2019). Nutritional management in childhood obesity.Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome, 28(4), 225-235.

Mahajan, P. B., Purty, A. J., Singh, Z., Cherian, J., Natesan, M., Arepally, S., & Senthilvel, V. (2011). Study of childhood obesity among school children aged 6 to 12 years in union territory of Puducherry.Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 36(1), 45-50.

Vale, S., Trost, S. G., Rêgo, C., Abreu, S., & Mota, J. (2015). Physical activity, obesity status, and blood pressure in preschool children. The Journal of Pediatrics, 167(1), 98-102.

Click Here To Order Now!

The Risk Factors for Childhood Obesity

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We have qualified writers to help you.

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)