The Return of the Elgin Marbles

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!

Introduction

Nowadays, many countries strive to return the artifacts that originate from them to their possession. The Elgin Marbles, which were created and placed in Greece, had resided in the British Museum since the nineteenth century when they were relocated from the Parthenon through an agreement with the Ottoman Empire (Wadsworth 2). There is no legal mechanism that will enable Greece to return the statues, which are already perfectly located in one of the worlds best galleries. This essay will explain why the Elgin Marbles should remain in possession of the British Museum.

Discussion

The accessibility of this exposition is critical for the British Museums goal to highlight the worlds history through artifacts. The current placement enables the sculptures to portray the cultural context under which they are created in the most optimal way (Marshall). The organization ensures that the statues are accessible to the public, along with numerous artifacts of the past, in a single set.

The removal of the Elgin Marbles goes against British law. Marshall writes that relics can be only removed from museums if it is done without detriment to the interests of students, leaving borrowing the only available option. This attitude aligns with the countrys views on history and still enables Greece to access the exposition, albeit temporarily.

In addition to British laws, there is no legal path for Greece to return the Elgin Marbles. After 200 years since the statutes were moved, the limitation of tort actions has passed, and the International Court of Justice is unable to compel the United Kingdom to amend its past actions (Wadsworth 26). Therefore, the exposition is likely to remain in the UK.

Conclusion

In conclusion, it is not feasible nor reasonable to seek the return of the Elgin Marbles back to their place of origin. They are paramount for the British Museum and are well-preserved in their current location. Moreover, they are protected by the law from being moved permanently. Greece can achieve its goal only if the UK agrees to give the statutes willingly, which does not seem to be the case.

Works Cited

Marshall, Alex. As Europe Returns Artifacts, Britain Stays Silent. The New York Times, Web.

Wadsworth, Tanner. The Advantages of Giving Up: Greece and the Futile Quest to Force the Parthenon Marbles Home by Judgment. Columbia Journal of European Law, 2022.

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!