The Moral Dilemma: Nephrologist’s Choices

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!

A moral dilemma is a difficult situation where a person has to choose between two alternatives, all of which contribute to the transgression of a moral principle. The decision during a dilemma involves a conflict between two duties, such as loyalty to self or allegiance to society (Papouli, 2019). It is paramount to note that any decision taken may have a negative outcome, and Aristotle’s golden mean is an antidote to solving the challenge.

Example of a Moral Dilemma

A newly employed nephrologist is transferred to a city-based healthcare facility. The nephrologist observes an increasing number of hospital readmissions, and the people readmitted suffer kidney problems. After investigating the patient’s history, he discovers that the patients are admitted for minor surgeries during which radical nephrectomy is performed for organ trafficking. He finds out that the hospital works closely with a criminal syndicate trafficking human organs. When the top management at the hospital realizes that he has found out, they summon him and ask him to join them in performing the heinous acts, otherwise, he will lose his job.

Nephrologist’s Choices on the Moral Dilemma

When the nephrologist discovered the moral decadence in the hospital, he had only two choices, either join them in perpetuating organ trafficking or reject the offer and lose his job. The doctor applied Aristotle’s golden mean in the scenario by selecting a choice that favors more people (Rachels & Rachels, 2012). The essential virtue in the situation is the courage to face the rogue hospital managers. Deciding to join forces is likely to jeopardize the lives of many unsuspecting patients. The decision will further be propagated by cowardice as he may fear what the managers may do to him once he quits the job with their secret. Courage is a virtue that gives a person a choice to confront fear or uncertainty to solve evade crime (Rachels & Rachels, 2012). He expressed the virtue by overcoming the qualms caused by joblessness and quit his job for the patient’s safety and avoiding crime. Quitting the job is best because it serves the community’s interests and saves many lives. Accepting the offer would have helped him to maintain his job, but he sacrificed his job for the sake of society.

References

Papouli, E. (2019). . European Journal of Social Work, 22(6), 921–934. Web.

Rachels, J., & Rachels, S. (2012). . McGraw Hill. [PDF document]. Web.

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!