Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
The Matrix Method is an organizational system that guides you through the litera
The Matrix Method is an organizational system that guides you through the literature review process from start to finish. It is “intended to teach you how to read a paper, organize the review using the Matrix Method, analyze it, and create a narrative synthesis”. Now you have searched and found the literature that answers the PICO question, you can now synthesize what you have learned and how it fits into your literature review. One strategy is to create a synthesis matrix. A synthesis matrix helps you organize the main points of each book, article, or another information resource you use. It allows you to see how the sources relate to each other and help guide your writing.
Instructions:
Look at the literature Matrix (John Hopkins University Appendix G) and use the sources found in Discussion 6.
Use the Literature Review Synthesis MatrixActions to compare and contrast findings found in appendix G.
Title the discussion with the PICOT question.
Initial post: Your post should be within a range of 200-240 words.
By looking at the Matrix, carefully look at similarities and differences between the studies.
Do any themes arise from comparing and contrasting are there any similarities or differences.
Write a paragraph synthesizing the information. Remember, this is in preparation for writing the literature review.
Cite your references APA 7th ed. (not included in the length of the post). Lesson 8: Discussion – Synthesis of the EvidenceLesson 8: Discussion – Synthesis of the EvidenceCriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis Table20 ptsOutstandingsynthesis tables included that clearly reflect the synthesis of the evidence.10 ptsAcceptableAt least one synthesis table is included that adequately reflects the synthesis of the evidence.5 ptsUnacceptableA synthesis table is included that limitedly reflects the synthesis of the evidence.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesizing20 ptsOutstandingPrecise conclusions and drawn based on the findings/ data from the Results section. Conclusions are clearly warranted based on the data/ findings and add insights to the previous literature in the area of study.10 ptsAcceptableSome analysis and synthesis of data/ findings are provided. Some of the conclusions may overinterpret the data/ findings.5 ptsUnacceptableLimited synthesis of the study data/findings is provided and /or limited attempt to draw conclusions from the data. Interpretation of data or findings is incorrect. Findings were not interpreted based on the known literature in the area of study. Conclusions are inconsistent with the data presented in the Results section.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConsiders Limitations20 ptsOutstandingLimitations of the review are clearly stated and are linked to implications for the review.10 ptsAcceptableAcknowledges limitations. Some synthesis of perspectives on how the limitations may affect the conclusions.5 ptsUnacceptableSomewhat simplified position with some sense of the limitations. Minor or vague synthesis of the effect of limitations in the synthesis.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentifying Key Themes20 ptsOutstandingClearly, accurately, and appropriately identifies key themes based on the evidence synthesis.10 ptsAcceptableidentifies most or all key themes/s and/or findings/s. Some minor inaccuracies or omissions may be present, but do not interfere with meaning.5 ptsUnacceptableIdentifies some key themes/s and/or finding/s. May have some inaccuracies, omissions, or errors present that interfere with meaning
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA guidelines and writing mechanics20 ptsOutstandingWriting is free of grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Follow APA 7th ed. guidelines.10 ptsAcceptableWriting includes less than 5 grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Follow APA 7th ed. guidelines with minor errors.5 ptsUnacceptableWriting contains more than 5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. Does not follow APA 7th ed. guidelines.
20 pts
Total Points: 100
Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount