Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
Any revolution is a great change in the life of any society. This can be a political, economic, technological and even psychological change. Thus, Scientific Revolution, which took place in the nineteenth century, enabled the humanity to make a great stride forward. People of the twenty-first century welcome such changes and understand the importance of the revolution that shaped the development of the society. However, thinkers of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries could have a different view on the change as they only witnessed first steps and saw the way political and economic system changed in revolutions and wars.
Thus, Karl von Clausewitz considered the nature of war and it is possible to predict his view on the Scientific Revolution. The thinker notes that war is a conflict between two polarities (Von Clausewitz 14). Von Clausewitz does not give any evaluation and does not state that it is bad or good. However, he notes that the war is often inevitable as there are always polarities that tend to lead to a conflict. Hence, it is possible to assume that the thinker would welcome the course of the Scientific Revolution that is, actually, an inevitable and natural event. More so, it is possible to identify two polarities, the old and the new, which got in conflict and led to the development of the technology and thought. The thinker would also support the spread of ideas of democracy as they would diminish polarities, which could occur.
At the same time, Burke would definitely oppose the Scientific Revolution. The thinker stresses that the change is usually negative as people should focus on what they already have and try to stick to it (Burke 22). The philosopher would oppose the Scientific Revolution as it was a rapid and dramatic change. Burke could welcome only slight changes which would not change such fundamental things as the societal structure and mindsets. Of course, the thinker would also oppose development of democratic ideas as they were totally different from what was in the society of the early eighteenth century.
In conclusion, it is possible to note that the two thinkers have a different view on such a great change as the Scientific Revolution. Von Clausewitz would welcome the changes as he saw it as a natural cause of development while Burke would be against as he regarded a change as a threat to the society.
Works Cited
Burke, Edmund. Reflections on the Revolution in France. Oxford: Stockton Wilson, 2013. Print.
Von Clausewitz, Karl. On War: Book I. On the Nature of War. Web.
Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.