Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
Radical behaviorism: skinner
Skinner used principles of reinforcement to put forward his theory of behavior. This theory shows how reward and punishment can impact on behavior. Although Skinner has proposed many credible models on animals, his propositions on humans are widely contentious and inadequate. Skinners’ theory disregarded causes of behavior in an individual, such as thoughts, traits, and needs. Instead, he put emphasis on the more scientific explanations which are external.
Therefore, this theory has failed to give a credible description of personality, as it attributes everything to science. His approach to behavior focuses on observable features. Skinner opposed the idea of thinking about personality traits or inner intentions, arguing that such traits relate to circular reasoning. In addition to focusing on external causes and observable behaviors, Skinner also paid attention to control over behavior.
However, the fact that those inner factors can determine the direction of the behavior shows that skinner’s behavioral perspective is inconsistent. Regarding learning principles, Skinner suggested that a person and the environment undergo mutual responsiveness. In other words, he suggested that a person’s behavior can lead to contingent change in environment, which again forces the person to adjust the behavior. This scenario is referred to as adaptive behavior; it can be reduced by punishment and increased by reward (Skinner, 1972).
Behavior that becomes accustomed to its environment is reinforced. In regards to this view, Skinner suggested that it is the short-term rather than the long-term consequence of behavior, which is significant. This view is in contrast with what happens in the real world because immediate and long-term consequences of behaviors are poles apart. Reinforcement of behavior can be categorized differently, which includes positive reinforcement, primary reinforcement, secondary reinforcement and negative reinforcement. All forms of reinforcement serve to increase the rate of behavior response.
On the other hand, punishment reduces the response rate. Punishment has been cited as unsuitable for controlling behavior because of its unpleasant feelings that reflects in an individual. These feelings remain in a person long after the undesirable behavior has been changed, and may hinder desirable behavior thereafter. As such, Skinner was opposed to use of punishment to control behavior (Cloninger, 2007).
Skinner also suggested that reinforcement of a particular behavior can be stopped with the aim of changing it. This process is referred to as extinction. The behavior that is changed through this technique can unexpectedly return later. Skinners’ operant behavior theory has found wide application in different fields, especially in therapy and education. Skinner encourages use of positive reinforcement, particularly because it is self-sustaining. Learning principles can be used to change behavior through a technique known as behavior modification. This technique has been applied in a wide range of behaviors, including weight control, oral hygiene, classroom management and many more (Cloninger, 2007).
Skinner’s theory points out that the behavior of animals, such as rats, is like that of humans. Nevertheless, it is contemplated that this view is in contrast with what personality theory would propose. This is in the sense that distinctive human characteristics such as language and thought are disregarded. In addition, Skinner’s proposition dismissed the genetic impact of personality and glorified the potential of learned behaviors (Skinner, 1972).
Psychological behaviorism
Staats proposed psychological behaviorism that strongly criticized radical behaviorism for neglecting psychological tests and individual differences, while tackling personality issues. Staats also integrated biological influence to address the shortcomings of radical behaviorism. Staats conceded Skinner’s suggestion that behavior can be maintained through reinforcement, though his argument was human oriented. Skinner’s radical behaviorism left determination of reinforcing factors to empirical analysis, hence contrasting Staats’ claim that stimuli that bring out emotional responses also reinforce according to the new learning (Staats, 1996).
He added that emotional responses enhance positive emotions and discourage negative emotions. Detailed explanation of the specific behaviors that supplement the human behaviors that are developed by chaining was used by Staats through behavioral repertoires. Staats pointed out some basic repertoires (BRRs), which develop into consequent learning. He maintained that learning is later compromised if the basics are not acknowledged.
Staats emphasizes more learning for a person to be well-adjusted. He expressed concern that those people who do not undergo the basic learning would end up behaving in a maladjusted manner. Numerous psychological disorders may result from emotional-motivational repertoire. Behaviorism is a source of intervention for a number of disorders, such as poor social skills and learning deficits (Staats, 1996).
Personality assessment – behavioral view point
Radical behaviorism found no relevance in personality tests. In contrast, psychological behaviorism scrutinizes behavioral repertoires from persons by conducting a number of personality tests. Theories of personality postulate that behavior can be predicted or caused by personality trait. This relationship can be used to assess personality traits on the basis of behavior. For example, someone who gives out frequently can be said to be charitable.
Act Frequency Approach (AFA) is therefore used to measure personality traits by use of methodical measures for appraising the regularity of typical behaviors. The challenging aspect of this proposition is that it relies on presentation of self-reports and fails to notice the significance and circumstances of the behavioral actions (Staats, 1996).
In the view of this discussion, it is obvious that earlier behavioral approach has recently established some agreements with personality theory. For example, behaviorists have attempted to provide more precise definitions on personality concepts. While skinner theory excludes inner aspects of a person such as thoughts, Staats includes them, hence well-matched with psychology theories. In particular, theoretical study on personality development is very explicit in behaviorism. In this regard, behaviorism theories have contributed immensely in personality theories (Cloninger, 2007).
References
Cloninger, S.C. (2007). Theories of Personality: Understanding Persons. New York: Prentice Hall PTR.
Skinner, B. F. (1972). Beyond Freedom and Dignity. New York: Vintage Books.
Staats, A. (1996). Behavior and Personality: Psychological Behaviorism. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.