Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
Introduction
Many companies around the world underline the high importance of creating effective working conditions. Different strategies and approaches are taken to establish the work process, which is free from any kind of obstructions. The comfort of employees now has a high priority. Although most companies failed to accomplish this challenging task, there are several successful examples. Despite investing enormous resources in creating benefits for employees, these companies develop and get richer. The purpose of this paper is to analyze measures for improving working conditions applied by organizations, which provide the best workplaces.
Google is considered to be one of the best places in the world to work, and there are many good reasons to state that. Abundant benefits provided to employees amaze and attract a lot of applicants. Onsite facilities like fitness centers, medical and child care were established to improve the health of the staff (Fortune, 2017). High-quality food, which is free, contributes to a satisfying working environment as well. Also, small bonuses like free haircuts or laundry services do a great job of delighting the personnel. Such strategies as addressing personal needs motivate members of a group team and increase their efficacy (Losh, 2011). Another important aspect, which raises the efficiency of this company, is group cohesion. There are several features, which distinguish a cohesive team. Members of such a team have common goals, and their skills and abilities are compatible (Losh, 2011). The combination of these factors cultivates the team spirit, which greatly enhances cooperation. One of Google’s policies emphasizes the importance of dependability and psychological safety (Great place to work, 2017b). Among other characteristics, dependability implies the understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of co-workers regarding which the most effective decisions are made. Psychological safety creates an encouraging environment. Workers feel free to share their views without the fear of disapproval.
The Boston Consulting Group
Another famous for its achievements company is the Boston Consulting Group. Its workplaces are appreciated by numerous staff members. The focus on satisfying the personal needs of employees makes this company a highly appealing place to work for many professionals. Among other advantages, the consulting group offers health coverage, unlimited sick days and college tuition reimbursement (Fortune, 2017). These are the most winning benefits as they meet the main interests of the majority of people. Also, it is worth mentioning that the policy aimed against any type of discrimination attracts specialists not less than other factors. That eases the process of adjustment for newcomers and maintains a good working environment. That additionally motivates team members (Losh, 2011). Strategies to unite workgroups occupy an important place in the company’s management. The diversity of employees represents the society in which the company performs (Great place to work, 2017c). Hence, that makes it easier to form teams members of which share common goals and cooperate in an effective manner. In addition, the company carries out “staff affiliation networks” which broaden people’s horizons on specific issues (Great place to work, 2017c, para. 2). That highlights the company’s interest in improving cultural literacy among the personnel.
Genentech
This biotechnology corporation has created a casual atmosphere for its workers and provides them with various bonuses. That makes Genentech one of the most attractive employers. Individual demands of personnel are the most prominent aspect, and the company pays much attention to it. The workers are provided with fully-paid sabbaticals, compressed workweeks and college tuition reimbursement (Fortune, 2017). Emphasizing the role of each employee in the overall success of the company additionally stimulates the staff. Also, Genentech arranges various activities aiming to improve communication, which reinforces the collaboration among personnel (Great place to work, 2017a). In spite of the fact that the workload is high, the company’s management establishes a balanced workflow and a comfortable working environment. Another example is a flexible schedule, which is used by the majority of employees. In addition, the non-discrimination policy of the company contributes to group cohesion. Reducing the level of unsocial behavior enhances social cohesion (Van den Bos, Crone, & Güroğlu, 2017). The non-discrimination policy attracts different minorities who increase the diversity of the company’s staff.
Conclusion
Assessing mentioned above examples, one may say that these companies practically implement Homan’s theory of exchange in groups. Homan’s theory describes the importance of the equality between the efforts made by a team member and an obtained reward (Losh, 2011). When the balance shifts and members of a team get inadequate profit, people began to leave the group. In described examples, the policies are mainly aimed to maintain the stability of workflow and control the mentioned balance. Despite a heavy workload, personnel works very hard and efficiently because people obtain decent recompense for their job. This stability is ensured by providing all necessary conditions, which include not only material goods and benefits but also a safe working environment. Such strategies attract new and stimulate current employees emotionally and spiritually increasing the overall effectiveness of the company’s performance.
References
Fortune. (2017). The 100 best companies to work for. Web.
Great place to work. (2017a). Genentech. Web.
Great place to work. (2017b). Google Inc. Web.
Great place to work. (2017c). The Boston Consulting Group. Web.
Losh, S. (2011). Group behavior in organizations. Web.
Van den Bos, W., Crone, E., & Güroğlu, B. (2017). Peer group cohesion and prosocial Behavior. Web.
Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.