Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
THE ARTICAL THAT IS TO BE USED: https://www.psichi.org/page/281JNSpring2023-Mask
THE ARTICAL THAT IS TO BE USED: https://www.psichi.org/page/281JNSpring2023-Mask-a…
I HAVE PROVIDED A EXAMPLE PROJECT BELOW
Your objective is to demonstrate understanding of how to read an empirical article and identify its main components.
For your assignment, you must find an empirical article (excluding meta analyses, content analyses, and qualitative analyses) published within the past 10 years in a peer reviewed journal.
Guidelines for selecting the empirical article:Your article must have been published within the past 10 years
Your article must be published in a peer reviewed journal
Your article must be empirical (excluding meta analyses, content analyses and all qualitative analyses)
Most importantly, you must be able to understand your selected article.
You are strongly encouraged to find an article publshed in the Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research (https://www.psichi.org/page/journal_main#.Yt_ijOxBw-Q). These are articles written by undergraduate students that have undergone the peer review process.
Follow the outline below to complete your assignment.
Use APA style to cite and format your assignment (page 1: title page; pages 2 to 3: body; and page 4: references): https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_style_introduction.html
Recommended: Please use 12 pt Times New Roman font and double spacing.
Word count: An allowance of 10% above or below specified word count.
Assignment Outline:
Title Page: Create an APA style title page (https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_style_introduction.html) //LO: #evidencebased (correctly structure information utilizing a scientific format)
Body: On pages 2 and 3, include the following information:Paragraph 1: Introduce your article and convey the purpose of the study. Cite the source you used to make sure the article is published in a peer reviewed journal and how you determined the article is empirical.LO: #evidencebased (summarizing an empirical article)
Paragraph 2: Identify one hypothesis tested in the article and the variables studied in the hypothesis.LO: #hypothesis development
Paragraph 3: Briefly, explain the outcome of the hypothesis test. Was the hypothesis supported or rejected? Based on the results, generate a new research question and a hypothesis (i.e. a potential explanation that is testable). After your hypothesis statement, explicitly identify your independent and dependent variables.LO: #evidencebased (drawing conclusions about the findings in your own words)
LO: #hypothesis development (developed a testable hypothesis that is clear)
References: All sources cited within the body of the assignment should be included in the reference page (https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/reference_list_basic_rules.html)LO: #evidencebased (correctly structure information utilizing a scientific format)
Assignment Information
Length:approx. 800 -1000 words inclusive of Title page (References NOT counted). LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
#EvidenceBased
Identify and appropriately structure the information needed to support an argument effectively.
A written or spoken communication that is intended to make a specific point should clearly present relevant and persuasive evidence. Doing this well is a two-step process. First, one must identify the evidence relevant to supporting the conclusion. The argument must be formulated to be consistent with the supporting evidence and should address apparent contradictions. Second, one must arrange evidence effectively. This means anticipating where one’s audience will notice a need for evidence, determining how much evidence will be needed given the strength of the conclusion, and deciding on how best to present the evidence (e.g., as a set of claims, a figure, a quote, or a paraphrase). In all cases, written and spoken, evidence should support underlying assumptions and show that implications of the argument are consistent with established facts and principles.
Example
You have a proposal for how to help your elementary school students learn math, and need to convince your academic supervisor that it is worth implementing. While preparing your presentation, you organize evidence to support two main lines of reasoning: interventional studies that showed the efficiency of the method and results of similar programs in other cities that were able to learn more complex materials with a curriculum involving this method. You select the best original figures and results, interpret them and add overarching conclusions from the individual examples and the evidence as a whole. You evaluate the studies you present, explaining the strengths and weaknesses of the evidence you use and explaining why it is generalizable to your school. Finally, you mention potential counterarguments to the method such as the associated capital and labor costs, but explain why the advantages that the implementation offers outweigh the disadvantages.
#HypothesisDevelopment
Evaluate the link between hypothesis-driven research and the theories or observations that motivate it.
Scientific research begins with observations, which then must be organized to suggest underlying patterns of regularity. Such patterns in turn suggest hypotheses about the nature of the factors that may give rise to these patterns in the data. As science progresses, scientists formulate and use theories to develop further hypotheses and design additional studies. A well-formed hypothesis requires one to appreciate the links between data, theories, and models. Hypothesis-driven research is essential to the iterative cycles of data collection and theorizing that forms the core of the scientific method.
Example
You read a story about Blue Moon butterflies in the Samoan Islands. The butterflies were attacked by a parasite that destroyed only male embryos and resulted in males being only 1% of the population. But after 10 generations (about 1 year) males are now 40% of the population. Based on these facts, you come up with two competing explanations: (a) an extinction event could have led to the sudden disappearance of the parasite, which would explain the sudden resurgence of male butterflies, or (b) male butterflies developed a resistance against the parasites, which might also explain such resurgence. Hypothesis (b) also stems from your knowledge of genetics and the plausibility of developing resistance to particularly harmful species through genetic mutations coupled with natural selective pressures. You discuss predictions that stem from these two explanations, specifically that in case (a) most parasites would be gone, and in case (b) that the parasites might still be present in butterflies that developed resistances. Finally, you make the connection between study design, testing the mentioned predictions, and deciding which of your hypothesis is corroborated. (And in fact, researchers found that the parasite was still present and that currently, males all carried the mutation that allowed them to survive the parasite’s attack.).
Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount