Stages of Moral Development in Kohlbergs Theory

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!

Introduction

Kohlbergs Theory of Moral Development is an important framework for understanding the personality of an individual. It assumes that people move through the three levels of moral development during their life. At the same time, the moral understanding of every person is associated with cognitive development (Gibbs, 2019).

Discussion

Kohlberg outlined the three levels of moral reasoning such as pre-conventional, conventional, and post-conventional (Gibbs, 2019). These stages of morality are characterized by specific features typical for people during different periods of their lives. For instance, during the pre-conventional stage, they do not have a personal code of morality, while the second phase is characterized by the acquisition of social norms regulating good and wrong actions (Gibbs, 2019). Finally, the last stage is characterized by a better understanding of fundamental ethical principles (Gibbs, 2019). In such a way, this division helps to trace the evolution of ethics and morality within an individual.

The theory has its own advantages and disadvantages linked to the proposed classification. Thus, Kohlberg introduced a more detailed, robust, and well-thought-out classification and determination of moral reasoning compared to other frameworks (Gibbs, 2019). For this reason, it became easier to analyze specific actions and motivations. At the same time, the theory has several weaknesses, such as the disregard for cultural issues. The theory considers cultural norms typical for a particular society and vital for developing representations of good and bad actions (Gibbs, 2019).

Conclusion

However, it lacks an understanding of how the same norms can be used in terms of another culture. Additionally, the theory is criticized for the absence of an empirical basis necessary to support the credibility of a certain assumption (Gibbs, 2019). In such a way, Kohlbergs idea of Moral development has its strengths and weaknesses that should be considered.

Reference

Gibbs, J. (2019). Moral development and reality: Beyond the theories of Kohlberg, Hoffman, and Haidt (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!