Socrates was one of the ancient Greek philosophers who was well known for his reasoning and values. He was born in Athens in 469 BCE. Compared with other philosophers, Socrates can be considered a complex man whom most people admire/commend. After reading The Apology of Socrates, The Crito, and The Xenophon, it was clear that Socrates was unique from other philosophers in that he always followed his value and his mind and did what he felt was right. Although some people might develop animosity towards him, Socrates demonstrates both his knowledge and adherence to moral values at all times. Consequently, this paper holds that Socrates was a true philosopher who fought for democracy, tyranny, and authority and always sorted answers to the truth, justice, welfare, and law. The man was so skillful that he never feared talking about the hidden facts of the universe.
Socrates did not deserve the terrible death that was alleged on him. The apology shows Socrates being aligned before the wise men who accused him of being knowledgeable of harmful and dangerous information. Socrates was charged with the crime of corruption and impiety. They claimed that Socrates worked against their gods and that he ended up feeding the young/youths with unproven truths. Consequently, he was put on a death sentence though not guilty. According to Socrates, death is not something to be feared because we shall ultimately die in the long run. He holds that sharing wisdom and knowledge with society is not harmful but instead is beneficial to the community. According to Socrates, the wise men cannot accuse someone else of falsely impersonating a wise man because that is just ignorance. According to The Apology, Socrates owns his wisdom and does not coward in the presence of governing power because he knows their accusations are highly foolish and dull-witted (Burnet, 1977).
Although he was charged on the grounds that he was misleading the youths, I believe that Socrates did it in the interests of what he believed was right and on what he thought would make a remarkable society/person. Accordingly, Socrates developed a Socratic method of teaching. Socrates adopted this model to engage his fellow Athenians in discussions. The technique requires no PowerPoint slides but instead sharing knowledge and wisdom through word of mouth. The Socratic model offers a process of self-internalization that helps one to become critical in their teachings.
Although Socrates was an inspiration to many people, Athens was not the best place for his philosophies. This is because Athens is a city that runs on democracy and where many people have dominant power bestowed on them. Xenophon confirms that Socrates was a man who loved arguments, and consequently, he attracted trouble with many Athenians. Similarly, he developed admiration from the people who loved his teachings and views. By reading The Apology, one gains greater insight into Philosophy and what it is meant to address. From his intelligent speech to his bone-chilling reasoning, Socrates teaches us that life is full of unknowns and questioning those unknowns is more than okay. He almost challenges humankind to question life around them and assess what we are and are not told. One can imply that Philosophy is just that. It is questioning the world around us, inquiring about the do’s and don’ts of society, and opening one’s mind to accept bigger things than what is in front of us (Plato & Plato, 1927).
There are two pearls of wisdom, and Socrates does a great job explaining this through his trial. A wise man can be someone knowledgeable in all aspects such as mathematics, astronomy, and literature. But a man can also be smart by being knowledgeable about life itself. This type of wisdom may be the platform for Philosophy and why it is so valuable. Philosophers not only question life around them, but they also find ways to answer these questions. The questions they ….