Societal Approach to Abortion at Various Levels

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Table of Contents

Introduction
Background
Shifting Public Opinion
Religious Views
Human Rights Movements and Medical Grounds
Conclusion
Works Cited

Introduction

Research studies and reviews portray abortion as having divergent extremes in the American context and have a sharp integration into the political aspect to relate to the concepts and different ideas around abortion. Being an issue with great controversy, it has seen efforts for law amendments and funding to allow for legalities and freedom strategies that give more flexibility on abortion. Abortion refers to the termination of pregnancy which entails embryo or fetal removal before the baby is born. Abortion is severely influencing vice in our society. Individuals in large numbers use abortion to kill an unborn for reasons of varying nature. Alternately, others accept that it is a woman’s lawful right to pick early termination, particularly if there should arise an occurrence of inbreeding, assault, or medical problems compromising the existence of a mother.

Background

In the contextual issue, it is of significant ethical problem. Due to its relevance in society, the issue of abortion has those affirmative, the proposers, and those who think that abortion is a vice against humanity and unethical, the opposers. It has led to congress motions and the need for constitutional amendments in light of civil rights, healthy provisions, ethics, and religious views surrounding the concept of abortion (Todd-Gher et al., 2020). It refers to the idea, which harbors sensitive and callous demands, and seeks to create a world where abortion is free will. The text aims to evaluate and analyze the provisions and propositions of abortion and its perceptions to create a varying dynamic effect on the population. According to cultural practices, political views and alienation have a robust way of deciding acceptance and funding of abortion and bills that support it. Until recently, when it was viewed from law provisions, abortion held impacts of varying degrees across state settings.

Furthermore, it became a basis for evaluating thoughts and policies that allowed for freedom of expression. It also drags the issue of feminism in, which is a vital concept regarding the views on abortion practices. They viewed restrictions on abortions as the continuation of the vice of male dominance, which cumulatively led to rules that allowed for abortions under extreme provisions and cases. Also, it brought forward the issue of democracy, where permissive abortion practices were viewed as democratic rights for women, a feeling that feminists especially upheld (Miller, 2019).

Shifting Public Opinion

With various ideas and concepts of abortions, opinion ideas of different groups began influencing how the topic would be integrated into the social and cultural settings of many communities in America. It enhanced sensitization and extremism between those who supported the opposers, which led to the integration of issues that pivoted heavily on the constitutional structure (Grossman et al., 2017). The awareness about intellectual human rights and freedom gives room for the public to create an environment that depicts acceptance and integration of abortion. The increase in the autonomy for decision-making among women provides for an easier choice of abortion due to freedom. Availability of knowledge and awareness has enlightened people to be more aware of the issues surrounding abortion. Also, the presence and access of medical services and units have enhanced the view of abortion as there is more insight into the various aspects of the practice and its impacts.

It is evident with the way the issue of abortion is being discussed on social media, parliaments, and the need for constitutional amendments to legalize the practice. Some organizations champions for legalization of abortion, and hence its prevalence among the population at different levels. The public’s assertions strongly suggest that access to abortion services has seen a steady and consistent increase over time. Society is becoming more liberated to support abortion under various circumstances. It has generally increased the opinions among the public regarding abortion practices. Courts and legal bodies have shown interest in activities and processes that push towards the recognition and legalization of abortion. (Adams-Cohen & Nicholas, 2020)

Religious Views

Despite religious views which also impact the progression of abortion, the perception of abortion as a vice goes against the provisions that life begins at birth, and its leaders involve in active campaigns to ban abortion, and this goes further in shifting the public opinion, the public is more and more embracing the issue as there are even increased efforts to amend to legalize it. It also draws on some religious leaders who have supported abortion as an ethical way of reducing the psychological impacts of unplanned pregnancies.

There have remained divisions over the concept of abortion on religious terms, where personal values and character clashes with the divided Christian values in impacting one view about abortion. It has the effect of continuity of abortion; religious views are becoming more open to adopting the practice of abortion in the contemporary social setting. It elicits the reactions and criticisms from the others who are reserved, but trends depict more evidence of integration of the practice into the lives of the faithful. The mixed approach towards abortion context among religious groups allows for the possibility of change or conviction.

It is shown by the idea concept upheld by the church regarding issue scopes such as healthy life and riskiness concerns of the mother or the child, and the need to mitigate the consequential effects of rape situations, abductions, and unwanted pregnancies. Also, there is a consistent significant increase in abortion cases among members of religious groups. It goes a long way to depict that the religious settings no longer hold strict reservations and perceptions towards abortion but instead allow for integrating abortion ideas into its environment.

Human Rights Movements and Medical Grounds

Certain Human rights and activist groups champion for legalization and decriminalization of abortion. They push for the withdrawal of punishment and legal actions against those who engage in abortion. The groups have a claim of right of decision and freedom among the women community. There have been amendments and suggestions that lobby for women only to make decisions regarding legal issues surrounding the concept of abortion. It enhances the availability of information regarding insights into abortion policies, service access, and procedural processes. These groups regard dignity for the unborn but entirely focus on the mother and give her explicit privileges to make decisions on the fate of the unborn (Frohwirth et al., 2018). Medical grounds allow for termination of a pregnancy when the life of either the mother, the child, or both are in danger.

Many international organizations have joined hands with political affiliations structures to push for recognition of abortion as a legal process that does not call for punishment measures or backslash from society. The political contribution has enhanced efforts and resources towards actions and policies to see that abortion is legalized. It follows for the modifications to the existing procedural policies in such cases as crimes and health issues. Issues with health concerns are more accepted as a basis for legalizing abortion and form a recognized exception of decriminalization in almost all countries. Feminists hold strong supportive stances toward the legalization of abortion and the progression of efforts that call for acceptance at various levels and settings (Bhalotra et al., 2021).

Human rights and activists have been investing time and resources to help push for the conceptual idea of decriminalization of abortion to be accepted. It has seen issues such as approaches to governments and the use of media to try and impact that brings about the change about abortion. The life of the developing baby or mother has terminated when the progression is ascertained to be hindered, as provisioned by procedural protections on medical grounds. It explains the prevalence of abortion issues in the more advanced countries which uphold democracy.

Conclusion

To sum up, the issue of abortion is a practice that harbors heavy ethical views and is even more significant due to its evolution into acceptance with time. There are no clear frameworks to define and dictate how abortion should be viewed, which explains the multiple divisions at different levels, notably religious and political scopes. Despite some members of the society holding strong reservations about abortion, resource and financial efforts are being made towards having a situational condition that calls for acceptance of the practice and integration into socio-cultural, political, and religious provisions. Several idea concepts hold different approaches to the issue of abortion, which entails political and religious influences. The differences in political classes and civilizations explain the relatively broader presence of abortions and their aspects in developed countries.

Works Cited

Adams-Cohen, Nicholas Joseph. “Policy change and public opinion: Measuring shifting political sentiment with social media data.” American Politics Research 48.5 (2020): 612-621.

Bhalotra, Sonia, Irma Clots-Figueras, and Lakshmi Iyer. “Religion and abortion: The role of politician identity.” Journal of Development Economics (2021): 102746.

Frohwirth, Lori, Michele Coleman, and Ann M. Moore. “Managing religion and morality within the abortion experience: Qualitative interviews with women obtaining abortions in the Grossman, Daniel, and Kate Grindlay. “Safety of medical abortion provided through telemedicine compared with in person.” Obstetrics & Gynecology 130.4 (2017): 778-782.

Miller, Arthur H. “Public opinion and regional political realignment.” The politics of realignment. Routledge, 2019. 79-100.

Todd-Gher, Jaime, and Payal K. Shah. “Abortion in the context of COVID-19: a human rights imperative.” Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters 28.1 (2020): 1758394. US.” World Medical & health policy 10.4 (2018): 381-400.

Click Here To Order Now!