Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
Introduction
The claim that growth regulation is “good for the municipality but terrible for the country” raises serious concerns about the trade-offs inherent in these strategies. On one hand, growth control strategies can increase inhabitants’ standard of life by fostering more healthy and desirable communities (Ben-Joseph, 2005). These regulations, for instance, may support the construction of compact, free communities with a combination of housing, industrial, and legitimate purposes. This can aid in reducing traffic gridlock and air pollution, promoting healthier choices, and creating a feeling of community among people.
Growth management rules might impede a company’s potential to develop and emerge viable locally and worldwide. These policies can stifle corporate growth and extension by restricting the availability of industrial building land or establishing rules that raise the expense of conducting business. Consequently, corporations may be less willing to establish or expand in towns with growth management rules, limiting these areas’ capacity to recruit new enterprises and keep current ones, thus stifling economic progress (Molotch, 1976). According to Chinitz (1990), expansion management strategies that restrict the rate and structure of an urban population can have both beneficial and unfavorable effects on municipalities and the broader economy (Chinitz, 1990). He claims that while these regulations might increase the standard of living in specific locations, they can also hinder firms’ potential to develop and remain relevant on a national and global scale, resulting in slower financial development for the country.
Response by Fischel (1991) and Neuman (1991) to the Discussion
In reaction to Chinitz (1990)’s, Fischel and Neuman (1991) contend that population management measures can make cities more appealing to companies by increasing people’s life experiences. They say that companies are drawn to high-quality-of-life locations since they provide a more attractive atmosphere for their staff and consumers. They also contend that growth restriction regulations may lead to more effective use of property and resources, which can benefit firms in the long term. Innovative development strategies that favor compact can lessen the demand for automotive mobility, lowering the cost of conducting business by reducing transportation costs and enhancing accessibility to clients and workers. Fischel contends that the condition of living in a city is a crucial element in selecting where companies choose to go and that population management strategies can make a municipality more appealing to enterprises (Fischel, 1991). Growth optimization, according to Neuman (1991), may also contribute to more effective use of property and supplies, which can benefit firms in the long term.
In addition, the influence of growth containment strategies on municipalities and the broader economy will be determined by every city and area’s unique context and conditions. While growth control can positively impact local communities, it can also harm the more significant industry by limiting enterprises’ capacity to develop and participate (Burby, 2003). The trade-offs in these programs underscore the importance of thorough planning and assessment of each society’s requirements and objectives.
Scripture backs up the premise that towns and cities need to work toward becoming sustainable and habitable for all. Ecclesiastes 3:1-8, it states, “There is a time for everything, and a season for every activity under the heavens…a time to build up and a time to tear down, a time to plant and a time to harvest.” This verse emphasizes balancing and managing all of life’s facets, including community development. Scripture also stresses the value of community and the common good. 1 Corinthians 12:12 says, “Just as a body, though one, has many parts, but all its many parts form one body, so it is with Christ.” This stanza emphasizes that a person’s choices and actions may significantly affect the community. This means that, in the context of growth management, choices about growth must be undertaken with the community’s best interests in mind instead of only those of particular proprietors or investors.
Reasons behind Smart Growth
Innovative development policies, a form of growth management strategy, are supported by considerations of environmental protection, social equality, and the effective use of resources and land. The concept that people have to maintain a healthy environment and responsibly manage its resources is supported by the biblical statement that “The earth is the Lord’s and everything in it” (Psalm 24:1). By encouraging compact, walkable communities that reduce the damaging effects of expansion on the natural environment seek to ease these worries.
Attracting companies, as per Neuman and Fischel (1991), growth management measures can make towns more appealing to businesses by increasing people’s quality of life. They say that companies are drawn to high-quality-of-life locations because they provide a more attractive atmosphere for their staff and consumers (Jepson & Haines, 2014). This idea is supported by the Bible, which says in Genesis 1:28, “And God blessed them, and God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it; and have dominion over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air and over every living thing that moves upon the earth.” This verse emphasizes that people are responsible for looking after and maintaining the world and its resources, particularly human communities’ built environments.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the discussions between Fischel, Neuman, and Chinitz show the complexities of growth control strategies and the trade-offs that must be made in their execution. While growth containment can have a good impact on local towns, such as increasing inhabitants’ standard of living and promoting more effective utilization of land and commodities, it may also have a detrimental impact. The particular context and conditions of each city and area determine the influence of development control. The passage from Psalms 24:1 reinforces the concept that intelligent growth regulations may assist us in caring for the planet and properly using its asset.
References
Ben-Joseph, E. (2005). Innovating regulations in urban planning and development. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 131(4), 201–201. Web.
Burby, R. J. (2003). Making plans that matter: citizen involvement and government action. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(1), 33–49. Web.
Chinitz, B. (1990). Is growth management good for the town and bad for the nation?Journal of the American Planning Association, 56(1), 3–8. Web.
Fischel, W. A. (1991). Growth management reconsidered: Good for the town, bad for the nation? A comment. Journal of the American Planning Association, 57(3), 341–344. Web.
Jepson, E. J., & Haines, A. L. (2014). Zoning for sustainability: A review and analysis of the zoning ordinances of 32 cities in the United States. Journal of the American Planning Association, 80(3), 239–252. Web.
Molotch, H. (1976). The city as a growth machine: Toward a political economy of Place. American Journal of Sociology, 82(2), 309–332. Web.
Neuman, M. (1991). Utopia, Dystopia, diaspora. Journal of the American Planning Association, 57(3), 344–347. Web.
Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.