Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
As the instructions state, refuting an argument signifies proving it wrong, while rebutting an argument suggests attacking it with an alternate point of view. The first argument discusses whether allowing open access to drugs will eventually lead to lower usage rates, as legalization will take the profit out of drugs (Bennett, 1990). The first point includes concrete examples of the way the changes in prices and drug availability will impact addiction: “In reality, this would allow government to share….profits…by criminals” (Bennett, 1990, p.2). Referencing direct quotes from credible sources and concluding with a contrasting justification, the author refutes the argument.
Moreover, the second argument focuses on how legalizing drugs will eliminate the black market. While demonstrating the various ways certain types of drugs will remain illegal, Bennett additionally offers insight into the instances of drug use by the youth (Bennett, 1990). According to the author, “…pushers will continue to cater…young customers…” (Bennett, 1990, p.3). In that way, the argument is rebutted with a novel and contrasting idea without necessarily proving it wrong.
Furthermore, the author responds to the next argument stating that legalization will dramatically reduce crime. The following sentence includes the refuting claim: “But researchers tell us many drug-related felonies are committed….before…taking drugs” (Bennett, 1990, p.3). Hence, the author contradicts the point with explicit evidence of the contrary. Ultimately, the final statement argues drug use should be legal as it only harms the users. Through several examples of how drug addicts cause harm to their families and friends, Bennett accentuates that “society pays for this behavior” (Bennett, 1990, p.4). Opposing to the original argument, this refuting claim additionally forms the conclusion of the whole piece. In that way, the author’s stance, backed up by detailed examples, emphasizes the importance of fighting drug legalization.
References
Bennett, W. (1990). Should drugs be legalized? Reader’s Digest, 136 (90).
Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.