Question 1: Read the article by Neil Andersson and his colleagues (2009). This i

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We have qualified writers to help you.

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!

Question 1: Read the article by Neil Andersson and his colleagues (2009). This i

Question 1: Read the article by Neil Andersson and his colleagues (2009). This is a study of domestic violence in Pakistan that uniquely combines survey methods and field research.
After reading the article, answer the following questions:
1. What is the research question that the study investigates?
2. Which of the 4 types of research (exploratory, descriptive, explanatory, evaluation) does it represent? Explain how you arrived at the answer.
3. What type of probability sampling did the survey employ?
4. Explain why it is important to use this type of probability sampling for this type of study.
5. What did the researchers do to increase the likelihood of honest answers about such a sensitive topic as domestic violence? Discuss each of the following aspects:
5a) survey design,
5b) survey administration,
5c) training of interviewers.
6. What elements of this survey research overlap with field research?
7. How do the researchers address the potential ethical problems of this study? Address each of the following domains:
7a) privacy and safety of the respondents,
7b) safety and emotional burnout of the interviewers,
7c) any additional ethical concerns.
8. What are the study results? How do the researchers interpret their findings?
9. What factors are found to increase the likelihood of domestic abuse in Pakistan?
10. Which population would you generalize these findings to? Why?
Question 2: Read the article by Tremblay and his colleagues (2004) on child aggression and its predictors, and evaluate the article by the following:
Each question is graded on a scale of 1 to 5 or give an N/A (not applicable) or I/I (insufficient information). Make sure to explain your rating for each question in a sentence or two.
____ 1. In a long article, does the author briefly summarize the purpose and results at the beginning of the Discussion section?
(Explain):
____ 2. Does the researcher acknowledge specific methodological limitations?
(Explain):
____ 3. Are the results discussed in terms of the literature cited in the introduction?
(Explain):
____ 4. Has the researcher avoided citing new references in the Discussion section?
(Explain):
____ 5. Are specific implications discussed?
(Explain):
____ 6. Are the results discussed in terms of any relevant theories?
(Explain):
____ 7. Are suggestions for future research specific?
(Explain):
____ 8. Has the researcher distinguished between speculation and data-based conclusions?
(Explain):
____ 9. Overall, is the Discussion section effective and appropriate?
(Explain):
Question 3: Read this article by Devah Pager (2003) – her study uses a very clever experimental method to assess the impact of race and criminal record on employment opportunities.
Answer the following questions:
What are the research questions investigated in the study?
What is the method this study employs?
What are the main results of the study?
Of the 4 types of research (exploration, description, explanation, and evaluation), what type does Pager’s (2003) study represent? Explain why?
How would you interpret the results shown in Figure 6 (p.958) and their implications?
Evaluate the article by the following:
Each question is graded on a scale of 1 to 5 or give an N/A (not applicable) or I/I (insufficient information). Make sure to explain your rating for each question in a sentence or two.
____ 1. In a long article, does the author briefly summarize the purpose and results at the beginning of the Discussion section?
(Explain):
____ 2. Does the researcher acknowledge specific methodological limitations?
(Explain):
____ 3. Are the results discussed in terms of the literature cited in the introduction?
(Explain):
____ 4. Has the researcher avoided citing new references in the Discussion section?
(Explain):
____ 5. Are specific implications discussed?
(Explain):
____ 6. Are the results discussed in terms of any relevant theories?
(Explain):
____ 7. Are suggestions for future research specific?
(Explain):
____ 8. Has the researcher distinguished between speculation and data-based conclusions?
(Explain):
____ 9. Overall, is the Discussion section effective and appropriate?
(Explain):

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We have qualified writers to help you.

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!