Qualitative Nursing Research Critique: Essay

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Qualitative research-based experts predetermine their interests and background relations with the topic under investigation before venturing into the study. Notably, the academician demands answers to several questions that revolve around the underlying superstitions within society. Through information obtained from the natives of environ, a conclusive report ensues to justify the unraveled experiences. However, the researcher bears the responsibility to choose an appropriate method of inquiry and a reliable scientific technique to equate the information to real life. This paper, therefore, summarizes and critiques a qualitative research method deployed in the journal “Nurses’ Perspectives Regarding the Disclosure of Errors to Patients: A Qualitative Study”.

A Summary of the Findings

Based on the rating captured on critique written summary grading, McLennan et al. (2016) clearly outline the key information entailed in the investigation within the abstract. Since the inquiry encompasses a wide range of professionals and subjects, it is appropriate to pick on the research method for the justification. Through an elaborative subject matter and a variety of preexisting underpinnings, a real-time solution exists for the research topic. Despite different views and challenges, the finding functions to provide clarity on the importance of conveying health messages to the patients within healthcare nursing. However, by assigning an individual with no prior information and unknown to the interviewees, uncompromised results occur for analysis (McLennan et al., 2016, p.18).

Moreover, uniform research-guided questions administered to the parties prevail for future reference through voice-activated devices (McLennan et al., 2016, p.18). The involvement of the healthcare leaders through selective sampling for interrogation provides a diversified knowledge base necessary for investigation. Despite entitlement to the institution’s powers, experienced medical practitioners unveil the critical issues in a restricted environment. The computation of the information conforms to the purpose of the research and categorically outlines the procedures. McLennan et al. paint out a reader-involving experience technique with clearly drawn conclusions from the literal information gathered.

The Strengths, Weaknesses, and Applicability of the Research Report

Strengths

Even though predesigned series of questions exist for the investigators, the nurses enjoy a vacuum to express their views and experiences during the inquiry session (Choy, 2014, p. 102). Surprisingly, the researcher lacks background information on the field matters, a condition that provides conversation for clarity. Besides, most of the ideologies under investigation trace back to the history of nursing practice. Therefore, a wide range of opinions exists for verification of the accepted healthcare procedures.

Weaknesses

Relocating the interviewer to the medical facilities and the learning institute’s library requires an organized duration and transportation means (Choy, 2014, p. 102). Through variable working conditions and resources, the medical managers narrate stories that fit an individual institution’s set-up. However, critical information might lack throughout the interrogating process. An invalid conclusion, therefore, characterizes most of the qualitative research approaches used.

Applicability

The research methodology is used to highlight the knowledge difference that exists within the nursing practice. Through proficiency relations between the nurse and the patient, quality and patient-friendly environment prevail in healthcare nursing. However, a departure from the intervention policy is rooted in the training module and the set working policies for medical centers. Overall, the qualitative research method unveils underlying facts that prevail in society without meaningful conclusions.

The Use of Qualitative Research Methodology to Guide Evidence-Based Practice

Nursing is a noble responsibility that requires interaction among stakeholders. Therefore, a unanimous process is required to unveil the underperformances within the practice. Moreover, the curriculum needs to address knowledge differences experienced in the field through patient-nurse interactions. Through the state department of health, the policy should be introduced to safeguard the needs of the victims. However, the criteria of administration should consider the prerequisite client understanding and perception of the opinion.

Conclusion

In summary, the qualitative research critique assumes investigation activity based on undefined principles within a defined space. The techniques deployed work in harmony with the purpose of the investigation. Through comprehensive data computation, the underlying factors evolve from the sample population interviewed. However, the method comprises both strengths and weaknesses, following the nature of the research and the tools deployed. As a result, the qualitative research procedure occasionally provides insufficient findings to justify an occurrence.

References

Choy, L. T. (2014). The Strengths and Weaknesses of Research Methodology: Comparison and Complimentary between Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19(4), 99-104.
McLennan, S. R., Diebold, M., Rich, L. E., & Elger, B. S. (2016). Nurses’ Perspectives Regarding the Disclosure of Errors to Patients: A Qualitative Study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 54, 16-22.

Click Here To Order Now!