Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
Experience is what we are aware of its existence, and is a product of our conception, though it does not limit our understanding, but stimulates reasoning as it tries to satisfy the desire in us for knowledge. The knowledge we have of things starts from some simple impressions that are mostly sensible, and there are parts of this knowledge which do not arise from experience, but something beyond it.
This knowledge that transcends experience is the priority concept, which is independent of the experience we have of objects we use to gain experience without the use of senses. The knowledge of a person can either be from experience posterior or priori, which is knowledge from universal things. The difference between the complete Transcendental Philosophy and Critique of Pure Reason arises from the exhibition of human knowledge based on the prior concepts, while the Critic of Pure Reason deals with the artificial elements of prior concepts.
This means that the perception of knowledge, which a person has, especially one got through sensibility, is directly related to our intuitions, which are translated or copy into our memory and thoughts. This is through the ability of the mind to memorize a concept through understanding. Things that form part of the prior knowledge are space and time, and they form a part of the internal pure intuition. Both these conceptions are dependent on our sensibility and their existence as a pure intuition depends on our sensibility to perceive them either as external or internal pure intuitions.
The knowledge perceived by humans arises from consciousness, the sympathetic part of thought, and the power of cognition of objects. This can either be a real object or an object in our minds.
Kant states that reason is the source of all truths and I think that we, as human beings, form or develop judgments from the first experience we have of something. We do not take a second chance to make a clear judgment of what we perceive to be the truth. What our senses see, at first sight, we assume to be a reality and form our judgments based on such facts. The sensory receptors of our bodies form a big part of our judgments as in a dream where we wake up and assume that we were dreaming, yet we do not develop a second thought to prove that we were indeed dreaming. Therefore, we must not rely on senses, because most of the time, these senses are not correct as they do not form part of the judgment, but perceive as seen at first sight.
However, there are things like our dreams that do not form a clear sense of logic because it does not give a clear sense of time and space useful in making logic. The dreamer might not make a clear judgment of the time and space where the dream took place, and cannot relate it to the real thing that happened in the dream. Therefore, a lack of understanding of time and space leads to an error in judgment in our understanding of human life. The two must have a connection to make sense.
However, the objection does not stand much ground because a person has to link the beliefs with the judgments from the said experience. The objective is true in the sense of a dreamer, but it does not apply to a person who is not dreaming and has a sense of time and space and priority concepts.
Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.