Public Policy on Corruption

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Introduction

Corruption denotes improper utilization of public office for personal gains. Widespread corruption is a clear indication that a given government is malfunctioning. A public policy created in this context regards anti-corruption. It is important to endorse a public policy, which advocates that no individual or any public/private office should indulge in corrupt dealings of any form. In most cases, characteristics of corruption are practiced in markets or organizations.

A lot of studies carried out indicate that corruption does not only reduce economic growth but it also lowers investments. This indicates why the proposed public policy is necessary. Corruption leads to reduced private savings and also destroys political stability. Foreign investors have also shown little interest in countries showing high prevalence of corruption. Studies also indicate that the level of corruption in countries importing goods have a negative effect on the business structures (Kellow, 2007).

A number of scholars have greatly contributed toward the analysis of corruption. The major reasons why corruption exists are low pay and poor monitoring system. Despite, an anticorruption policy will be viable in this context. Consequently, to create reliable policies on corruption, the government and the public should cooperate in eliminating such vices. In addition, action should be taken against those who violate these laws.

Details of the policy based on the Rational Model

This policy is going to affect all shareholder and employees. In addition, it will be applied to all the directors and officers in every institution. Going against the policy will lead to a severe punishment and disciplinary measures. An individual found corrupt will not only be sucked from his or her job but will also be referred to the relevant authority for castigation. With regard to the rational model, implementing this theory will experience some challenges.

In addition, some of the policymakers will not completely contribute to its implementation when they realize that it may affect them later. For example, a corrupt politician will be against the enforcement of this policy. However, to obtain zero tolerance on corruption, the following policies are required.

Employees are not allowed to take or give bribes for their own personal gains. Conversely, it is also illegal for employees to make some donations in form of payment with an aim of gaining. They are also prohibited from facilitating payments. According to the proposed anticorruption policy, it is also illegal for them to give gifts to clients and government officials.

In addition, when carrying out company business, an employee is not allowed to provide any gifts and entertainments to influence the rationality of such individuals. Records on the other hand must also be properly kept, all expenses are required to be adequately documented and maintained for long (Mbaku, 2007).

Before doing any business with a third party, an employee should ensure that the involved official meet the record keeping standards with regard to expenses connected with government officials. A written approval is generally needed when a given threshold has been exceeded. Before making any contracts with an organization, the employee must make sure that he or she is aware of the company’s background.

In addition, the employee should also have some information on the reputation of the company and its business capability. However, such acts must also contain provisions on anti-corruption. Finally, to ensure that there is compliance, proper training with regard to policies on anti-corruption as well as their roles must be carried out to the employees. When it comes to implementing these policies, some policymakers will not fully contribute to it due to their selfish interests.

The rationale of the policy

The rationale of this policy is to eliminate corruption. Internationally, corruption is hardly accepted. Factually, the vice slows down growth and development within institutions. Conversely, the policy intends to create viable provisions meant to deal with various aspects of corruption. This will be applicable to both public and private sectors. It is crucial to agree that the atrocities created by corruption are numerous. Nonetheless, it is possible to curb this menace despite the looming challenges.

How the model will assist policymakers in decision-making and implementation processes

This model is going to ensure that there is no biasness when it comes to the establishment and implementation of the concerned policy. In addition, people with self-interests will also be accommodated (Sapru, 2010). Besides, this model will ensure that there is universality when it comes to the application of these policies. Every policymaker will equally contribute to putting these policies into practice. Consequently, full transparency will be observed.

Evaluating the Rational Model

Contextually, the model monitors adherence to virtues concerning anti-corruption policies. This concerns the formulation of credible public policies. Additionally, the model exhausts all provisions of the policy-making criteria. It recognizes every aspect of viable public policies. Rationally, the model identifies the provisions of self-interest and biasness that might occur during the formulation of the previously mentioned public policy (anti-corruption policy).

It is important to report any suspected violation of anti-corruption policy to the concerned authorities as required by the model (Nicholls, 2011). Precisely, this model provides credible structures helpful in establishing, implementing, and evaluating the concerned policy. Hence, this indicates the viability of this model in formulating functional public policies.

References

Kellow, A. J. (2007). Science and public policy: The virtuous corruption of virtual environmental science. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Mbaku, J. (2007). Corruption in Africa: Causes, consequences, and cleanups. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

Nicholls, C. (2011). Corruption and misuse of public office. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sapru, R. (2010). Public policy: Art and craft of policy analysis. New Delhi: PHI Learning.

Click Here To Order Now!