Power in My Brilliant Friend by Elena Ferrante

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!

Understanding the ways in which one can exert authority or a certain community is critical to the assessment of political, economic, and cultural alterations within a specific community or state. Furthermore, the analysis of how power is executed, and how a political influence can shape interactions on both statewide and international levels is critical to effective communication in the global setting. Herein is the importance of My Brilliant Friend concealed. Written by Elena Ferrante, the book discloses the intrinsic link between political movements and the lives of citizens, at the same time analyzing the impact that the former has on the latter. Outlining the detrimental effects that power has on all levels of social interactions when used without regard for citizens needs and the concept of diversity, the book represents a strikingly honest revelation to its readers.

Understanding a particular social issue as a product of interpersonal relationships is essential to the interpretation of a specific conflict and its further resolution. The connection between the subject of a particular discussion and the presence of a strong power source that defines ones attitude toward the problem in question is quite evident (Dahl & Stionebrickner, 2003). In his approach toward the subject matter, Dahl is very straightforward; according to the philosopher,

The basis for the contrast between our definition and theirs is clear-cut: they hold that decisions are brought about solely by the exercise of power, while we believe that power is neither the only nor even the major factor influencing the process of decision-making. (Plotkin, 1996, p. 39)

Therefore, the presence of power implies that a specific issue can only be viewed from a particular stance and that any other means of revisiting it are inherently absurd. The identified dimension creates the breeding ground for the further manipulation of people and the promotion of state policies, philosophies, and principles that will define peoples decision-making in the future. In Ferrantes novel, the first dimension is represented rather vividly. The author portrays the malicious intentions of the ruling power and the effects that they produce on people whose vision is clogged by the active promotion of harmful rhetoric.

For example, Ferrante delves into the analysis of the first dimension of power when addressing the development of Elenas character. Although Elena does not yield to viewing the reality as the harmful rhetoric of the ruling party persuades her to do, she still changes her viewpoint to a significantly bitter one. For example, she expresses the following depressing revelation: There are wars. There is a poverty that makes us all cruel. Every second something might happen that will cause you such suffering that youll never have enough tears (Ferrante, 2012, p. 443). Thus, while the lead character does not succumb to the ideas that are foisted onto her, she still shapes her perception toward a much more bitter one (Tomain, 2017). The specified phenomenon aligns with the one outlined by Dahl, who suggests that powers set complex issues that should be discussed within the society, at the same time defining the values through which these problems should be examined (Dahl & Stionebrickner, 2003).

To prompt a particular line of social behavior, one has to establish a certain agenda and position it from a unique viewpoint. Bachrach and Baratz claim that the described step is crucial in shaping a coherent system of knowledge and perception, thus designing the approach toward interpersonal and cross-cultural interactions. The specified step implies setting the context in which the process of decision-making can take place (Wrong, 1979). Taking control over the identified stage implies having the capacity to influence peoples decisions to a tangible extent. In My Brilliant Friend, the agenda is set quite clearly, as seen in the development of Stefanos character. Stefano decides that his entrepreneurship endeavors are more important than relationships with Lila (Ferrante 44). However, apart from being a personal choice, the specified intent is also dictated by the ideas of manhood and personal growth that the standards of the regime promote.

The issue of relationships that people build after interpreting the issue in question is a nonetheless important dimension. According to Lukes (1974), the relationship-related face of power implies shaping peoples opinions to translate their perceptions into the desired outcome and, thus manipulate them into taking accurate steps. In My Brilliant Friend, the described dimension is exposed in all its unappealing nature. Specifically, the author portrays the deplorable outcomes of peoples ill-conceived perceptions of others and the resulting long-lasting conflicts (Goetz, 2017; Fives, 2017). The necessity to transform reality into the notions that fit ones world-picture can be deemed as a clear example of the phenomenon under analysis. To be more accurate, Ferrante (2012) states: There was something unbearable in the things, in the people, in the buildings, in the streets that, only if you reinvented it all, as in a game, became acceptable (158). The unwillingness of the narrator to accept the ugliness of reality and the need to escape into the realm of safety and peace represents the lead characters emotional response to the unbearable reality in which she finds herself and her friend. Thus, the need to rationalize and transform it aligns with Lukes idea of transforming ones perceptions.

By applying the specified dimensions of power to her narrative, Ferrante raises a range of essential issues that require delving into the depth of human nature. Moreover, Ferrante ponders over how these dimensions translate into the societal norms that distort peoples concept of ethics and moral values, turning them into pawns of the ruling class (Gaventa, 1980). The philosophical implications of viewing the three dimensions from different perspectives, such as the political economy, and sociocultural ones, seem to be at the core of the narrative. Therefore, exploring the described issues seems to be the most rewarding part of the analysis.

The application of the three dimensions listed above has helped to recognize the futility of intercultural conflicts as the means of driving the principles of political, economic, and social relationships to the common denominator. Instead, Ferrantes story allows one to embrace the notion of cultural diversity, which is the greatest and the most important issue that Ferrantes novel has to offer. By analyzing the novel and its characters, one will be provided with a chance an introspect into ones nature and rationale for decision-making (Murray, 2017). As a result, one can study ones inherent biases, preconceptions, and prejudices, seeking ways of getting rid of them and becoming a better person.

Depicting the drastic outcomes of power used with malicious intent or out of ignorance, the novel by Ferrante proves that negative outcomes affect people on all their dimensions, including the ones discussed by Dahl, Bachrach, and Baratz, and Lukes (Wrong, 1979). Each of the dimensions contributes to shaping the notion of a specific issue, promoting it to the top of the agenda, and manipulating people into assuming the position that is defined as acceptable by the ruling power. The novel should be given credit for the explicit portrayal of the detrimental outcomes that the described phenomenon has on interpersonal and intercultural relationships. Ferrante proves that information is an extraordinarily valuable asset, and that, when used uninhibitedly and with unlimited power, it can ruin peoples lives. Therefore, one has to evaluate critically the effects that specific power has on each dimensional plane and prevent citizens from being tricked into following the suggested line of thinking blindly.

References

Dahl, R. A., & Stionebrickner, B. (2003). Modern political analysis (6th ed.). Sidney, Australia: University of Sidney.

Ferrante, E. (2012). My brilliant friend. Trans. A. Goldstein. London, UK: Europa Editions.

Fives, A. (2017). Evaluating parental power: An exercise in pluralist political theory. Oxford, UK: OUP.

Gaventa, J. (1980). Power and powerlessness: Quintessence and rebellion. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

Goetz, B., (2017). On the frontlines of the welfare state: How the fire service and police shape social problems. New York, NY: Routledge.

Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view. London, UK: Palgrave.

Murray, M. M. (2017). The urbanism of exception. Oxford, UK: OUP.

Plotkin, W. (1996). Urban history of decisions and nondecisions. London, UK: ICOLT.

Tomain, J. P. (2017). Clean power politics: The democratization of energy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Wrong, D. H. (1979). Power: Its forms, bases, and uses. Oxford, UK: Vasil Blackwell.

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!