Political Philosophers Comparison: Locke and Hobbes

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Table of Contents

Introduction
Comparison
Strengths and Weaknesses
Conclusion

Introduction

It can be assumed that political philosophy is opposed to ideology in the standard sense. This philosophic approach calls for the arguments concerning the concepts of freedom, equality, democracy, and power and enables several concepts to coexist. In terms of the political philosophers, Locke, Hobbes, and More, they contributed greatly to the development of philosophical thought. However, it can be stated that Hobbes was most successful in grappling with the great problems of their age.

Comparison

Hobbes developed the ideas of natural and civil societies. Initially, he considered that people fight against each other which did not meet the human need for self-preservation and meant that society had to strive to maintain peace. This approach implied the setting in which all the people were united by the will to maintain security. Also, Hobbes developed the idea of absolute power, which could not be controlled by anyone. Notably, these concepts were the reflection of the events in England in this period. They mirrored the need for a strong state to restore order and peace in the country.

In his turn, Locke was the founder of the classical liberalistic ideas. He dwelt upon the domains of natural law and the contractual foundations of the state. The key fundamentals of his thought were the notions of power separation, sovereignty, and inalienable rights. In his approach, the state had to protect peoples right to liberty and property. He also formulated the rule of law concept, which included the subordination of all people to the law without exceptions.

As for More, he considered the approach of ideal utilitarianism. He argued that apart from meeting the desires and needs as both actual and predictable preferences, other things might also have the highest value. Among these preferences, he singled out the personal relationship and the aesthetic experience. However, the key aspect of his thought was the idea of equality.

Strengths and Weaknesses

All three philosophers supported the domain of social contract. Nevertheless, each of them supported the divergent tenets. Hobbes advocated for the pessimistic and egoistic view of human nature while the other two philosophers argued for the opposite. To be more precise, Locke stated that the government endorses and guards people and their rights. Hobbes refuted this concept assuming that only an absolute ruler could struggle with the peoples evil nature by overpowering them. In Lockes theory, the rights were preserved, and the malfunctioning state could be substituted. Whereas, Hobbess approach implied the protection by a powerful ruler, though, peoples freedom would be finite. Meanwhile, in Mores theory, the state would provide comfort.

Conclusion

Thus, Hobbess theory is a testament to the western cultural tradition crisis. It sought the rational justification of the politics of that time and the inability of traditional political science methodologies to give a convincing explanation to the challenges. On the other hand, the ideas of the two other scientists were also a search for the theoretical understanding of the social and political world.

Click Here To Order Now!

Political Philosophers Comparison: Locke and Hobbes

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We have qualified writers to help you.

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)