Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
Miracles do exist; however, according to Hume, people should never believe in them. In Humes view, the occurrence of miracles depends on the Christian religion, which disqualifies their authenticity.
Hume posits, Our evidence, then, for the truth of the Christian religion is less than the evidence for the truth of our senses (73). Therefore, the proof of the existence of miracles is weaker as compared to the stronger evidence of the real presence. This paper explores Humes argument for this conclusion, coupled with showing why the argument is not sound.
Hume disqualifies the existence of miracles, as the Christian religion is weaker and more insubstantial as compared to the evidence that comes with ones experience. Also, Christianity is entirely based on the apostles testimonies, which might have been distorted or flawed from one generation to the other, and thus, they cannot be validated.
On the contrary, a persons experience can be validated, and thus, it is stronger evidence as compared to the apostles alleged testimonies. Hume holds, A wise man&proportions his belief to the evidence (73). Evidence, in this case, amounts to tangible things like ones surroundings. Therefore, any wise man cannot believe in miracles because ones experience is greater than the unsubstantiated belief of miracles.
The second nullification of the existence of miracles hinges on the view that miracles violate natural laws. He claims, A miracle is a violation of the laws of nature and as a firm and unalterable experience has established these laws&is as entire as any argument from experience can be imagined (76).
In other words, Hume holds that every miracle should have credible proof and experience. Otherwise, the claims of miracles cannot hold. Also, Hume insinuates that everything that has been experienced conforms to the natural laws.
However, Humes claims are flawed, based on his assumptions. The first assumption is that natural laws should describe regular occurrences, but miracles are rare occurrences. The second assumption is that the regular occurrence should overrule the rare one.
The third assumption is that one should be in a position to weigh any evidence before validating it. Finally, the wise person should believe the greater evidence, which nullifies miracles, as they are lesser evidence.
Humes philosophy on miracles fails because it holds that miracles cannot be possible for they are based on testimonies. However, testimonies cannot be weighed, which violates Humes assumption, as listed above. Also, according to Hume, miracles evidence only appear as testimonies, as opposed to being experienced.
However, the experience cannot be perfect, which disqualifies Humes way of thinking. Also, Hume seeks to silence the most arrogant bigotry and superstition, and free us from their impertinent solicitations (73). This way, Humes motive is to dispel Christianity and thus even when given evidence like the resurrection of Christ, he will certainly counter the circumstantial evidence because it is recorded in the scriptures, which are inaccurate according to him.
Therefore, Humes arguments fail as they rely on empiricism, which is self-defeating as it can only be assumed, but not proved. Experience, which is supreme according to Hume, cannot be perfect, and this aspect faults Humes assertions.
In conclusion, miracles are inexistent from Humes point of view. He holds that miracles are based on scriptures, which are unsubstantial because they were written by apostles based on allegations that cannot be weighed. However, Humes perspectives are flawed as he relies on empiricism, which is self-defeating because it cannot be established or validated through its principles.
Works Cited
Hume, David. _Of Miracles. An enquiry concerning human understanding with a letter from a gentleman to his friend in Edinburg and Humes abstract of a treatise of human nature. Ed. Eric Steinberg. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1993. 72-77. Print.
Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.