Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
Ideas on Free Will
Free will has become the subject for reflection of numerous outstanding philosophers, who have affected the worldview of thousands of followers. Their understanding of this phenomenon differs due to the epochs they lived in and personal convictions. This paper will present the ideas of Aristotle and Lucretius through the prism of comparing and contrasting their opinions.
Aristotle believes that free will is a combination of all voluntary actions. He draws the line between voluntary and involuntary doings claiming that everything influenced by an inward desire of an individual is a voluntary action while everything done under the outward will of others or from ignorance is considered involuntary. In addition to it, if a person limits his or her actions by emotions or social norms, they are also involuntary ( Aristotle 4).
Lucretius, on the other hand, views free will compare it to the movement of atoms. The philosopher says that every action having place under the influence of the external force is not a free will, which comes from the inner desire and motivation of an individual ( Lucretius 18).
To sum up, both Aristotle and Lucretius agree that free will is always linked to a persons inward desire instead of outward request or order. They also agree that there are no occasions, which would turn involuntary action into a voluntary one because only individuals determine what is better for them. Both authors view free will studying the laws of nature. However, Lucretius compares it to the movement of atoms, which is impossible to alter in response to ones desire, while Aristotle focuses on the rules adopted by human society and the phenomena of power and authority.
Analysis of Logans Run
Most people agree with Plato, who believes that the picture of the world is determined by an individuals personal experience. This notion was developed in his allegory of the cave. The central idea is the existence of the cave full of fettered people, whose heads are fixed forward and who cannot get out of it because they are imprisoned forever. All they can see is the casting of shadows on the walls of the cave.
These shadows become the foundation for perceiving reality. However, Plato raises the question: what would happen if one of the prisoners managed to escape? Evidently, the real world and bright light of the sun would astonish him because he would not believe that everything seen before was unreal. Returning to the cave, he will be rich with the new knowledge, but other prisoners will laugh at him because their reality is still connected to shadows on the walls (Haymond 6-7).
The allegory of the cave inspired numerous fiction stories. The brightest example is Logans Run. Instead of the cave, the directors portray the domed city inhabited by young and beautiful people, who are renewed once reaching the age of thirty. Logan works as a sandman, i.e. a person, who kills those over thirty years old. As he escapes from the city, he finds an old man, who reveals the truth that the promoted renewal is death. As Logan returns to living in society, he desires to let others know about his discovery, but people think that he is insane. It means that Platos story and Logans Run are identical.
Moreover, the movie is a portrayal of free will. The motivation for taking this standpoint is the fact that Logan has chosen to run and get away from the system regardless of the established rules. His decision to come back and reveal the truth was voluntary, i.e. driven by inner motivation. That said, it falls within Aristotles apprehension of free will.
Works Cited
Aristotle. Free Will. Ed. Derk Pereboom. Indianapolis, Indiana: Hackett Publishing Company, 2009. 1-4. Print.
Haymond, Bryce. A Modern Worldview from Platos Cave. Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University, 2008. Print.
Lucretius. Free Will. Ed. Derk Pereboom. Indianapolis, Indiana: Hackett Publishing Company, 2009. 17-18. Print.
Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.