PART 1: Birch Aquarium Who? What? Where? With what/whom? When? Conjectures about

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We have qualified writers to help you.

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!

PART 1: Birch Aquarium
Who? What? Where? With what/whom? When? Conjectures about

PART 1: Birch Aquarium
Who? What? Where? With what/whom? When? Conjectures about Why?
Use the following questions as a guide for note taking during field observations at Birch Aquarium. Take notes and describe in as much detail what you see. You should spend at least 30 minutes observing. Feel free to tell who you’re observing what you are doing, or observe for a reasonable distance. (Fieldnotes will be no more than 1 page single spaced)
What are children doing?
What are children saying?
How are children engaging?
What objects are they engaging with?
PART 2: La Jolla Tidal Pools
Who? What? Where? With what/whom? When? Conjectures about Why?
Use the following questions as a guide for note taking during field observations at Tidal Pools. Take notes and describe in as much detail what you see. You should spend at least 30 minutes observing. Feel free to tell who you’re observing what you are doing, or observe for a reasonable distance. (Fieldnotes will be no more than 1 page single spaced)
What are children doing?
What are children saying?
How are children engaging?
What objects are they engaging with?
PART 3: Reflections from the Field
Reflect on the readings, discussions, fieldwork consider how your observations in the field relate to concepts we have been discussing about cognitive development.
Your paper should identify 2 concrete descriptions of observations at both field sites (e.g., who were you observing, what were they doing, what were they saying, what aspect of the exhibit were they engaging with)
Based on readings, lectures and discussions reflect on how concepts of cognitive development might relate to your observations.
Based on readings, lectures, discussions, consider what might be the possible learning outcomes of the experience is for the learners you observed (what do you think they learned at the end of the day)
The Reflective Paper give you an opportunity to synthesize the course readings, concepts, and discussions (thus drawing connecting your field work to the course content and project topic). Please do not merely summarize the readings. Instead, think critically about what you have read and consider the connections between the readings. Reflection should be approximately 3 pages, double-spaced. You must include at leasttwo course references.
Fieldnotes and Reflection Winter 2024
Fieldnotes and Reflection Winter 2024
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThick Description of Child(ren)’s Engagement
3 ptsExcellent
Fieldnotes include clear and concrete descriptions of how children are engaging in the learning environment. Description explicates what child/ren are doing, what they are saying, with whom they are engaging with, how long the engagement lasts. A robust description that enables someone not present to fully visualize the observation of children’s engagement in a learning environment.
2 ptsGood
Fieldnotes include descriptions of children’s engagement with a learning environment. There is some description of what child/ren are doing and with whom, but description may be missing context that helps someone who wasn’t present visualize what was observed.
1 ptsNeeds work
Fieldnotes include descriptions of children’s engagement a learning environment but it is unclear what child/ren were doing, as details are vague.
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of Learning Environment
3 ptsExcellent
Fieldnotes include clear and concrete descriptions of the learning environment that child/ren were engaging with. Description explicates what aspects of the exhibit children were interacting with, and what the exhibit was representing. A robust description that enables someone not present to fully visualize the the learning environment.
2 ptsGood
Fieldnotes include descriptions of a learning environment that focal child/ren were engaging in. There is some description of what aspects of the exhibit child/ren were engaging with, and some description of what is in the learning learning environment [mediational tools]. The description may be missing context that helps someone who wasn’t present visualize the environment.
1 ptsNeeds work
Fieldnotes include descriptions of a learning environment but it is unclear what aspects of the learning environment child/ren were engaging with and what are the meditational tools for learning, as details are vague.
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInterpretation and Analysis
3 ptsExcellent
Fieldnotes analysis make explicit connections from the description of the learning environment and children’s engagement in it, to concepts and theories on cognitive development. Interpretations makes grounded conjectures about learning. Grounded conjectures are ones that point explicitly to concepts on cognitive development, and that use evidence from field observation to support interpretation of what’s going on in observations of children’s activity.
2 ptsGood
Fieldnote analysis makes some connection from the description of the learning environment and children’s engagement with it, to concepts and theories on cognitive development. Interpretations of what is going on in field observations are only somewhat grounded conjectures about learning. Grounded conjectures are ones that point explicitly to concepts on cognitive development, and that use evidence from field observation to support interpretation of what’s going on in observations of children’s activity.
1 ptsNeeds work
Fieldnotes analysis is unclear in terms of connections from the description of a learning environment and children’s engagement with it, to concepts and theories on cognitive development. Interpretations about what is going on in observations are not fully grounded conjectures about learning. Grounded conjectures are ones that point explicitly to concepts on cognitive development, and that use evidence from field observation to support interpretation of what’s going on in observations of children’s activity.
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFieldsites
2 ptsFull Marks
Includes Fieldsnotes from Birch Aquarium and La Jolla Tide Pools
1 pts1 field site
Fieldnotes appended for 1 field site
0 ptsno marks
no field notes appended
2 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences
5 ptsFull Marks
Includes at least 2 references of course readings to ground interpretation of field notes. Makes explicit connection to concepts in readings.
3 ptsGood
Includes 2 references to course readings but it is unclear how they support the interpretations of field notes
0 ptsNo Marks
5 pts
Total Points: 16

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We have qualified writers to help you.

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!