Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
In his article, Our Blind Spot about Guns, Kristof states that the improvement of governmental gun regulation methods can help reduce the rate of gun homicide in the United States. He provides an example of how stricter controls over car ownership helped to decrease the number of vehicle accidents since 1921 by 95% (Kristof). Although his idea may be valid to some extent, comparing guns with cars is slightly inappropriate because these two things have different functions and are associated with distinct types of behaviour.
Supica claims that, throughout history, weapons and guns, in particular, were used to put food on the table, to provide personal protection, to enforce or defy the law, to defend or acquire territory and treasure, and to liberate or to enslave. Weapons can indeed be used in recreational activities, such as hunting or competitions, but primarily, they are warfare tools. The first guns were nothing but the advanced and more compact versions of cannons (Supica). This fact proves that they were designed merely to achieve greater military efficiency.
Nowadays, plenty of gun types exist, and it is possible to say that most of them are currently available to US civilians. This Our Blind Spot about Guns essay helps uncover the evidence that gun ownership can have a negative impact on society. As statistical numbers show, when gun availability is high, the number of mass shootings is significant as well. Only in 2015, there were 372 mass shootings across the country (Patel). These statistics make the United States a global leader in gun violence.
Although in article Our Blind Spot about Guns Kristof considers that it would be inadequate to confiscate guns and prohibit people from bearing them, it seems the right thing to do. In such countries as Israel and Japan, the government controls gun violence by banning the ownership of some types of weapons, e.g., semiautomatic guns, introducing mandatory licensing and governmental registration, and requiring individuals to complete instruction and education courses before granting them arms (Sadat 33; 34). In Australia, for example, there are also quite serious restrictions regarding the ownership of firearms, which is reflected in the annual gun homicide rates of 23 less than in America (Sadat 32). This shows the viability of gun restrictions and laws like these.
The background check procedure is another important activity in gun ownership granting. The Brady Act passed in 1993 requires federally licensed firearms dealers to carry out extensive buyers background checks before every purchase (Background Check Procedures). Nevertheless, although many people have been denied having weapons since the time the rule was enacted, this procedure alone is likely unable to prevent all dangerous individuals from owning a gun.
It is possible to say that by developing stricter weapon ownership regulations, the United States will be able to decrease gun violence. Nevertheless, the evidence for a favourable outcome of such actions is insufficient. Moreover, what can be effective in European and Asian countries may not necessarily be as efficient in America because of local attitudes to weapons. In the United States, public opinion regarding gun ownership is controversial some people are against it, and others advocate for it. Although Our Blind Spot about Guns summary shows that Kristof seems to be on the side of the latter, in objection to his comparison of cars with weapons, it is valid to note that while automobiles were created to travel and reach distant places, firearms were designed to kill. One may use such words as protection and self-defence to mask reality, but the truth is that the result of shooting a gun is always the same. Thus, it is possible to conclude that the complete prohibition of gun ownership is the best guarantee for the prevention of homicide.
Works Cited
Background Check Procedures. Giffords Law Center. Web.
Kristof, Nicholas. Our Blind Spot About Guns. The New York Times. Web.
Patel, Rohan. Project 3. Digication, Inc., Web.
Sadat, Leila Nadya, and Madaline M. George. Gun violence and human rights. Wash. UJL & Poly, vol. 60, 2019, pp. 1-90.
Supica, Jim. A Brief History of Firearms. NRA Museum, Web.
Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.