Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
The writing piece of Nicholas Kristof on gun laws provides an invaluable argumentation for implementing proper legislative regulations alongside technological improvements by making the issues analogous to cars and their regulation. However, Dennis Barons argumentative writing focuses on banning the English language in the United States by promoting the radical opposite of making the given language an official one. Although both writings provide valid points, the former one is evidently more effective in comparison to the latter.
The two essays differ in both the topic being discussed and approach for argumentation, where Nicholas Kristof argues with solid reasoning through the use of facts and Dennis Baron merely opposes by utilizing conventional knowledge. Nicholas Kristofs writing is significantly more effective because it offers a clear comparison of guns to cars, where the arguments are backed by historical facts. However, Dennis Baron seems to simply oppose the legislation of making English an official language by basing the arguments on the notion of forbidden fruit being more appealing. Both sources use evidence, but Nicholas Kristofs writing is vastly more superior since the evidence is factual historically, and the other author uses anecdotal evidence. Kristoff writes: A century ago, we reacted to deaths and injuries from unregulated vehicles by imposing sensible safety measures that have saved hundreds of thousands of lives a year (Kristof, 2014, para. 18). It works because cars are an ideal analogy for guns, and the gun regulation addresses the safety measures in regards to guns since they are deadly to users.
In conclusion, Nicholas Kristofs writing and arguments are more effective than Dennis Barons because the former author uses historical facts, logical reasoning, and clear analogies to claim that guns require some form of regulation.
Reference
Kristof, N. (2014). Our blind spot about guns. The New York Times.
Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.