Osama Bin Laden: Assassination vs. Trial

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Table of Contents

Introduction
Discussion
Conclusion
Work Cited

Introduction

President Barack Obama promised the American people that he could hunt and capture Osama bin Laden. These efforts were in relation to the terror he had caused on American soil under the operations of his terrorist group, al-Qaeda. Attacks such as the hijacking of American planes that killed about 3000 people and even those targeting foreign U.S. embassies had caused much havoc to the United States of America (Finegan 475). It was the suffering and pain that Americans underwent that necessitated the raid.

Discussion

The military operation led by the Navy SEALs in raiding bin Laden was not a surprise to many, but it has raised concerns about how it was handled. In my considerations, though, without making any moral judgment, bin Laden should have been dealt with differently. Like in every society where there is law and order and in which there is a right to a fair trial, bin Laden deserved to have stood before a court of law for prosecution. The American government had no power to make an exception to its constitutional guidelines.

Bin Laden’s killing could have been vindicating when it happened, but in retrospect, it reveals itself as a fight on terror pageantry with no regard for the protocols, and it, therefore, demonstrates a terrible precedent. In my thoughts, I believe that the decision to hunt and kill bin Laden was driven by nationalist sentiments due to the terror war and not the considerations of what was morally and constitutionally right. The United States government did not handle him as a criminal of war that should have been brought to justice but rather as a terrorist symbol that it had to prove itself against (Finegan 480).

Conclusion

In conclusion, I do not argue that bin Laden deserved better treatment. He was a terrorist responsible for many deaths and the destruction of property. However, the postulate on his death seems to be a hypocritical revenge scheme, not justice, public safety, and peace as purported.

Work Cited

Finegan, Rory. “Targeted Killings: Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace?.” Routledge Handbook Of Terrorism And Counterterrorism. Routledge, 2018. Pp 471-482.

Click Here To Order Now!

Osama Bin Laden: Assassination vs. Trial

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We have qualified writers to help you.

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)