Moral Status of Animals at Factory Farming

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!

Ethics of factory farming

Stewart is concerned about the extent to which human beings are willing to mechanize animal farming to meet their needs. Human beings have a less ethical concern for animal lives and would sacrifice animal life and living condition to satisfy consumer demands.

However, there exists an economic and ethical conflict of whether to produce more food through the use of the cruel animal farming method or to apply alternative methods that would support ethical animal farming practices. Stewart realizes that these farming methods that guarantee the animals’ rights and reduce their suffering would seriously affect many families that depend on such animal farming practices. Besides, animals and in particular, livestock are considered property. Property ownership rights give the owners the right to manage their property by the standard practices.

Stewart has a limited choice that he may apply to reduce the suffering that the animals undergo since there are no options for the more humane slaughter of animals. Whichever method is applied to slaughter the animals they still suffer pain and anxiety during the process. Besides, “vegan activism” would not have any significant influence on factory farming (Sapontzis, 1987). Whichever way, human beings would have to meet their demands through the use of such cruel methods.

Moral Status of Animals

As human beings, we are faced with moral dilemmas of whether to compromise an animal’s health and environment to adequately satisfy our demands or to balance the environmental and health requirements of the animals. The calves’ lives are separated from that of their mothers and instead of feeding on their mothers’ milk, there are provided with food that contains chemicals to enable them mature faster. This does not provide the right environment for the animals’ growth. Animals require independent biotic communities where they are free to move and free to interact. Thus separating the calf from the mother is not morally right.

They also need to live in a society just like human beings. Animals also need to feed on natural food just like human beings. Providing chemicals in food to make them mature first for human beings’ consumption deprives the animals of important nutrients and vitamins, which are only found on natural vegetation and food. For example, separating the calf from the mother denies the calf the opportunity to obtain iron from the mother’s milk. It may lead to the calf suffering from anemia hence condemning the calf to sickness throughout their lives.

Reference List

Sapontzis, S. E. (1987). Morals, reasons and animals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!