Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
Miranda Right is a verbal warning given by a police worker to notify the suspected of their right of silence during interrogations. To be more exact, the police usually inform an individual that one can refuse to answer the questions without their lawyer. Otherwise, the suspect’s claims might be used in further criminal investigations and might even result in the eventual arrest of the alleged, no matter guilty or not.
Furthermore, Miranda Right is a significant part of the American police and safety system as it is designed to find actual terrorists efficiently and not arrest innocent suspects. The right is also of high constitutional significance since “the right to remain silent … and … [the] right to the presence of an attorney” (Cagle, 2018, p. 449). In fact, prior to Miranda Right, suspects were themselves responsible for knowing about their fundamental rights during interrogations. However, in 1966, when the right was enshrined, it “placed the burden of informing a suspect of his constitutional rights on the interrogating officer” (Cagle, 2018, p. 449).
As a matter of fact, it might seem that it is unreasonable to mention the right of silence to suspects to more quickly identify the guilty one. To be more particular, if the police officer does not notify an individual of his or her right, a suspect might confess to the crime. Nevertheless, if terrorists are given a chance to avert the questions about accidents, they might not tell the truth in further investigations and court. As a result, the actual suspects might not be found, and to close the case, police might arrest not guilty people.
To sum up, Miranda Right is a crucial part of the constitution as it includes fundamental rights of suspects during criminal investigations. In other words, it provides people with the opportunity to avert questions until their lawyer is present. However, the efficiency of such a method is questionable as terrorists might stop confessing to their crimes during interrogations and proceed to court with false exclamations to prevent arrest.
Reference
Cagle, L. K. (2018). Charleston v. Gilmore: Understanding the admissibility of incriminating statements made before and after the reading of Miranda Rights. American Journal of Trial Advocacy, 42, 449.
Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.