Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
Stem cells are gotten from human embryos and used as specimens for carrying out medical research. The embryos are often destroyed during the research process, making opponents of abortion to liken stem-cell research to murder. In 2010, a federal court banned public spending on the research. However, a year later, a panel of appellate judges lifted the decision of the lower court ((Mears, 2011). The decision to lift the ban has been met with mixed reactions. Lifting the ban has more benefits than enforcing it.
Opponents of abortion do not support stem-cell research because the process involves destroying the embryos after obtaining stem cells. They say that embryos should not be destroyed but should be allowed to develop to human beings. Further, some civil societies and religious organizations discourage using public funds to finance stem-cell research because there are alternative avenues of researching without destroying embryos.
While filing the lawsuit to stop financing the project, the executive director of Nightlight Christian Adoptions said they want the government to invest in adult stem-cell research since it does not involve embryo destruction ((Mears, 2011). Notably, many opponents of embryonic stem cell research do not oppose the entire research process but are concerned with the need to save a life.
Although the concerns of the opponents of using embryonic stem-cell are genuine, it is essential to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the research before grading the process as unethical. First, the government should finance the project because the research could lead to the discovery of the cure for many deadly diseases and conditions.
Scientists say that the cells could help produce medicine to cure diabetes, cancer, spinal cord injuries, and Parkinson’s disease. Therefore, lifting the ban will most likely help to find a cure for many deadly diseases.
Further, lifting the ban would help save a lot of money. According to some proponents of embryonic stem-cell research, sustained financing would help researchers to carry on with the process productively. Also, the government would not need to cancel ongoing experiments (Harris, 2011).
Notably, thousands of people die annually from diseases and conditions such as cancer and spinal cord injuries. As a result, a means that would save the life and future of millions of people should be highly encouraged. Therefore, since by using a few stem-cells, the entire globe can benefit, the lifting of the ban on federal stem-cell research was highly ethical.
Additionally, the lifting was legal as it complies with the law. The appellate court observed that the law restricting funding of stem-cell research is written in the present tense. Therefore, it could not affect past decisions. At the same time, the two scientists who filed the lawsuit, through their lawyer Samuel Casey, said they were happy that the court kept their case alive. However, they also said they would consider filing an appeal (Harris, 2011).
Conclusively, the view that public funds should not be invested in federal stem-cell research based on morality is misleading. Embryonic stem cell research promises to provide health solutions that other research methods, including the traditional adult stem-cell technique, do not.
By continuing to invest in the project, the resources that the government had begun investing in the project will be used profitably. Moreover, the funding will help in solving numerous health complications, and lifting of the ban will encourage accurate interpretation of the law.
References
HARRIS, G. (2011). Ban on Federal Money for Stem Cell Research Is Lifted – NYTimes.com. The New York Times – Breaking News, World News & Multimedia. Web.
Mears, B. (2011). Appeals Court Lifts Ban on Federal Funding for Stem-Cell Research – CNN.com. CNN.com International – Breaking, World, Business, Sports, Entertainment and Video News. Web.
Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.