Measurement and Design: The Hope for New Life of Malaysian Migrant Workers

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Table of Contents

Introduction
Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Redefining the Tools
Variables: What Needs to be Measured and How
Dependent variables: the quality of migrant workers’ life
Independent variables: the endeavors of the Hope for the New Life
Constructs: defining the link between faith, strength and hope
Measurement: Evaluating the Effects
Key instruments: surveys and statistic analysis
Conclusion
Reference

Introduction

Although the Hope for New Life is bound to have a tremendous effect on the Malaysian migrant workers, its power will be quite hard to evaluate, since the changes will occur in a range of domains of the workers’ lives, including health related (Su, Hoe, Masilamani, Mahmud & Bulgiba, 2011), economic, social and financial ones (Zimmerman, Kiss & Hossain, 2011); nevertheless, by using such tools as surveys and statistical analysis (Buros Institute of Mental Measurements, n. d.), as well as combining qualitative and quantitative approaches, one will be able to compare the life standards before and after the Hope for New Life will have taken its effect.

Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Redefining the Tools

To evaluate the efficacy of the Hope for New Life, it will be necessary to use a combination of a qualitative and quantitative approach. Though the emphasis should be out on the quantitative aspect of the experiment, it will also be required to analyze the quality of the changes that will supposedly occur to the migrant workers (Tang & Chye, 2013). Thus, it will be possible to define whether the influence of the Hope for New Life is going to have any staying power on the migrant workers and the integrity of their community (Cheam, 2013).

Variables: What Needs to be Measured and How

Since the goal of the research is to improve the Malaysian workers’ standards of life by boosting their confidence and introducing the principles of integrity into their community, which, in its turn, can be achieved by a Christian organization, the effects that the Hope for New Life will have on the Malaysian workers will have to be measured (Kortlik, Williams & Jabor, 2011).

Dependent variables: the quality of migrant workers’ life

In the course of the research, the changes in the migrant workers’ confidence, will to fight for their rights and integrity will be observed. Therefore, it can be assumed that the standards of the migrant workers’ life are the dependent variables, which will be changed throughout the research (NCU template Applied Degree CP 2013 (DBA) or NCU template PhD CP 2013 (PhD), n. d.).

Independent variables: the endeavors of the Hope for the New Life

As for the independent variables, the influence that the Hope for New Life is going to have on the lives of migrant workers in Malaysia should be mentioned. In other words, the methods utilized by the Christian organization, particularly, the spiritual guidance (Hart, 2010), will be regarded as the key independent variable.

Constructs: defining the link between faith, strength and hope

Among the constructs that will be the most important for the study, such concepts as faith, hope and resistance towards outside negative factors will be used in the research as the main constructs. It should be noted, though, that in the paper, the constructs are related to each other directly (Nielsen, 2011). To be more exact, faith will supposedly enhance people’s hope, which, in its turn, will contribute to raising migrants’ self-esteem and belief in themselves, thus, shaping their strength and resistance towards unfavorable economic and cultural factors, such as high competition rates in the market of their choice, unwillingness of the local people to accept their culture, etc. (Yeng, Leoh & Shuib, 2012).

Measurement: Evaluating the Effects

There is no need to stress the significance of measurement – its results will define the outcomes of the study (American Psychological Association, 2010). However, it is worth keeping in mind that each measurement method will be used both as a tool for qualitative and quantitative calculations. Despite the fact that the emphasis is going to be put on the latter, qualitative evaluations will also play a major role in the research (Trochim & Donnelly, 2006).

Key instruments: surveys and statistic analysis

As it has been stressed above, surveys will be the key tool for conducting the measurements of the presumable success of Hope for New Life. It is important that surveys and questionnaires that will be designed to evaluate the changes occurring to the life of the migrant workers can be used for obtaining both qualitative and quantitative data (Doctoral Candidacy Resource Guide (DCRG), n. d.). To be more exact, the statistical analysis can be carried out based on the rates of people giving certain answers based on the total number of participants (Social research methods, n. d.). As far as the qualitative analysis goes, the answers to the surveys can be distributed into three key groups, i.e., the participant, whose life was not changed at all, those, whose life standards have been slightly improved and those, who have managed to prosper in Malaysia and become a valuable worker (Crowe & Sheppard, 2011).

Conclusion

While the effects that the Hope for New Life will presumably have on the lives of Malaysian migrant workers will be comparatively hard to evaluate, by conducting a range of assessments, including both quantitative and qualitative ones, which embrace different aspects of the Malaysian migrant workers’ lives, one will be able to comment on the changes that the religious organization will have on these people.

Reference

American Psychological Association (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Buros Institute of Mental Measurements (n. d.). Buros center for testing. Web.

Cheam, C. L. (2013). Economic growth, tourism and selected macroeconomic variables: A triangular causal relationship in Malaysia. The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 7(2), 185–206.

Crowe, M. & Sheppard, L. (2011). A general critical appraisal tool: An evaluation of construct validity. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 48(12), 1505–1516.

Doctoral Candidacy Resource Guide (DCRG) (n. d.). Web.

Hart, K. (2010) Kinship, contract, and trust: The economic organization of migrants in an African city slum. In Gambetta, D. (ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations (electronic edition) (pp. 176-193). Oxford, UK: University of Oxford. Web.

Kortlik, J., Williams, H., & Jabor, K. (2011). Reporting and interpreting effect size in quantitative agricultural education research. Journal; of Agricultural Education, 52(1), 132–142.

NCU template Applied Degree CP 2013 (DBA) or NCU template PhD CP 2013 (PhD) (n. d.). Web.

Nielsen, R. B. (2011). Cues to quality in quantitative research papers. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 40(1), 85–89.

Social research methods (n. d.). Web.

Su, T. A., Hoe, V. C. W., Masilamani, R., Mahmud, A. & Bulgiba, A. (2011). Hand-arm vibration syndrome among a group of construction workers in Malaysia. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 68(1), 58–63.

Tang, C. F. & Chye, E. (2013). How stable is the tourism-led growth hypothesis in Malaysia? Evidence from disaggregated tourism makers. Tourism Management, 37(1), 52–57.

Trochim, W. M. K., & Donnelly, J. P. (2006). The research methods knowledge base. Mason, OH: Thomson Custom Learning.

Yeng, C. H., Leoh, B. S. A. & Shuib, A. (2012). Circuitous pathways: marriage as a route toward (il)legality for Indonesian migrant workers in Malaysia. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 21(3), 317–343.

Zimmerman, C., Kiss, L. & Hossain, M. (2011). Migration and health: A framework for 21st century policy-making. PLOS Medicine, 8(5), 1–7.

Click Here To Order Now!