Internet Fraud: Importance of Problem-Solving

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

The identified crime is a type of cybercrime known as internet fraud. Firstly, the fast-evolving technology has made internet fraud more advanced and complex since it is much simpler for fraudsters to confiscate someone’s credentials without physically appearing to them (Wexler, 2018). Second, the records on crime that are now accessible do not match the evolving nature of cybercrimes. This is because the criminal information systems have not documented any modifications, and the statistics are less effective due to underreporting of internet fraud. In order to develop methods to curb this internet fraud, reliable documentation is essential.

Social media networks and Internet of Things gadgets are two technology resources that could be used to delve into crime. Twitter and Instagram are two social media sites that the authorities can use to track down the culprits and make arrests. The investigator can examine these sites, and they can consistently discover a connection between the victim and the culprit. Additionally, information is kept on Internet of Things gadgets, which can be used to track a criminal’s online trail. As a result, this information is reviewed and incorporated into the probe to provide valuable insights on how the probe will proceed. However, the prosecutors can argue that this is a privacy violation, making it a risky sphere of operations (Jung & Park, 2018). These approaches are beneficial for investigations since they focus on outcomes. Crimes are resolved, and justice is served through the employment of these investigative tools. These techniques are trustworthy since they provide answers in situations with no other options.

First, it is challenging to investigate and prosecute such offenses due to their multijurisdictional nature. As investigations across jurisdictional lines become more difficult, most of these culprits manage to avoid detection. Second, there needs to be more advancement in the law and technology. This is because more complex cybercrimes cannot be convicted because of how quickly technology changes and the law was not prepared to address these shifts. This problem has two solutions extradition coming first. If the victim’s nation and the perpetrator’s homeland have an extradition agreement, repatriation is always possible (Brayne & Christin, 2020). This will guarantee that the culprit is apprehended and convicted. Second, changing the legislation to reflect current circumstances. This will ensure that the culprits are apprehended within the confines of the law and subject to their sentence.