Indian Culture: Analysis of the Document

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Introduction

Each country, region, nation, and particular group of people represent a set of unique, individual, and inimitable traits and characteristics. Undoubtedly, certain peoples norms, customs, traditions, and orders represent some aspects of a general nature that have developed historically over many years. These are unshakable and eternal truths, which would be challenging to examine in some respects. Regardless of the time frame and boundaries, each individuals values, orders, and cultural norms should be taken into account. Hence, for example, an Indian will defend his people, and the Europeans, in the same way, will also blame their opponents for the wrong way of life, as is presented in one of the famous documents. However, there is no definite answer to the question of whether these actions are correct and correct. Indians are special tribes with an extraordinary culture and centuries-old traditions, which would be difficult to challenge.

Analysis Based on the SCIM-C Method

Summarizing

The document type is a brief argument essay, the thought of which is written directly from the words of the authors interlocutor, Micmac. Consequently, the primary author of this document was Chrestien Le Clercq, who conveyed in the paper the words of a Gaspesian Indian in a direct form, without any periphrases. The key aspects of this source are facts and ideas about those phenomena of indigenous Indians that differ significantly from French values, habits, and norms. The speaker defends his culture, refuting all sorts of prejudices and doubts that have matured in the French and European minds. From the text, a reader learns about how the Indian people live, how they survive and satisfy their needs. One can also understand what views on the world and the nations aspirations are. Moreover, the subject and theme of the paper defend Indian life. The main ideas include arguments, facts, knowledge, and information about a particular peoples culture, customs, values, and thoughts. Micmac expresses his opinion regarding the fact that his native civilization is strikingly different from the European one but still not inferior to it.

Contextualizing

One should note that this source was produced in New France in 1641. The reason why the document was created is an attempt to define the uniqueness, originality, and individuality of certain people. Despite the seeming superiority of the European way of life, Indian society is growing and flourishing and does not need any reforms and transformations on the part of the French missionary. In addition, Micmacs eloquent response recorded in the document helped to open the eyes of Europeans to the fact of how difficult it is for them to live in Indian society and vice versa. It was quite a turning point in society because it was the moment Europeans colonized and developed new lands in North America. In addition, European missionaries tried in every possible way to convert the Indians to Christianity and impose their way of life on them. Still, they only later discovered a massive gap between nations and peoples.

Inferring

I would like to mention the following critical thought regarding the above aspects. In my opinion, the Indians are a people devoted to their cultural values, customs, and traditions; they are very close-knit people who help each other. According to Micmac, I understand that the Indian way of life can only be envied in some way since Europeans do not even have similar features. The most interesting assumptions that seem to me are the happiness and power of the Indians, in many ways exceeding European elements. Certain people developed their spheres of a social activity after a long time and got used to living in the usual way. Despite the backwardness of the tribes, from the point of view of Europeans, the Indians do not look unhappy and need changes. I also concluded that some beliefs and assumptions could be fundamentally wrong and unconvincing. Thus, wisdom, the incredible depth of the soul and mind of the people, can be hidden behind an outwardly inconspicuous shell. Moreover, there is no need to be afraid to defend those principles that have been established for years and prove with fervent confidence the significance of certain people.

Monitoring

The source seemed to be quite helpful, significant, and reliable from the point of view of historical moments. It helped me to answer the questions and complete specific purposes and objectives. In my opinion, I answered the questions quite clearly, briefly, and correctly and would not change them. In addition to the source, I would also like to get acquainted with other documents confirming certain facts.

Corroborating

Indeed, there are other sources that strongly support my argument. However, I chose an external source as full-fledged support. For instance, one source says that the Indians were like aliens to the Europeans, possessing some mystery, which was not easy to reach (Facing History and Ourselves, 2017). Moreover, the similarity of this source with the document by LeClercq is that it describes precisely the relationship between the two peoples.

Conclusion

Indian society is like a world in which unshakable principles and laws rule. It has extraordinary and unique features that are inherent in a particular nation and society. It was Micmacs speech that shed light on the truth that had been hidden from prying eyes for a long time. Thus, It is not surprising that the French missionary could not achieve initiative and mutual understanding from a particular society. Despite the futile attempts of Europeans to understand and realize the culture and customs of the Indians, their ideas and views remain unchanged.

Reference

Facing History and Ourselves. (2017). Chapter 2: First encounters in the Americas. In Facing History and Ourselves (Ed.), Holocaust and human behavior. Facing History & Ourselves. Web.

Click Here To Order Now!