In Week 10 you submitted your Research Essay for peer review. Now you will retur

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We have qualified writers to help you.

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!

In Week 10 you submitted your Research Essay for peer review. Now you will retur

In Week 10 you submitted your Research Essay for peer review. Now you will return to the group and to the forum in which you posted the first draft of your research essay. Please read through the drafts posted by every other group member and offer some constructive feedback about each draft, feedback that you think should help the writer craft a stronger essay and earn a higher grade.
Requirements and Guidelines for Your Feedback:
Complete your own feedback by no later than 8 a.m. (CT) on Monday of Week Twelve in order to give your classmates a chance to incorporate your feedback in revising their final drafts.
Your feedback should address at least three different Revision Problem areas (Purpose, Meaning, Information, Structure, Clarity and Style) as described on pages 382-383 of your textbook. Be as detailed as you can in directing your classmates to what seems to need fixing the most in their drafts.
You are not limited, however, to addressing only three problem areas if there are problems in four or more areas.
Please do not concern yourself with grammar or spelling or punctuation errors at this point. Everyone should fix mistakes in those areas before submitting the final draft, but you are not proofreading one another’s essays.
Provide feedback for ALL drafts (in your group) that were submitted by 8 a.m. (CT) on Wednesday of this week. (You can safely ignore any draft submitted after that day and time.)
As long as you make one post about each group member’s draft that contains a thoughtful and substantive discussion of problems in three different revision problem areas by the due date and time, you will have satisfied the requirements for this assignment. I would encourage you, however, to read the feedback that others have posted, too, and to offer a follow-up post if needed to voice a different opinion about something if you think your classmate has received the wrong advice. You should each take the feedback you receive seriously, but whether you act on the advice of others is still entirely up to you and your judgment about the validity and utility of the feedback you’ve received.
I love true crime shows. The formula for these shows is simple: learn about the crime itself, investigate a few leads, find a suspect, prove the suspect is guilty, and go home, congratulating ourselves on a job well-done. Not only are these stories entertaining and chock-full of good guys, bad guys, cliff hangers, red herrings, and constant danger, but we are also granted the release of knowing that we are safe and snuggled into the couch, with the bad guys in jail and the good guys always on the right side. But the neat, pat conclusions of most of these cases masks a frightening reality. According to a recent study from the National Academy of Sciences, 4.1% of all those who are sentenced to death in the United States are innocent (Gross et al. 7230). In 1923, Judge Learned Hand said, “Our [justice system] has always been haunted by the ghost of the innocent man convicted. It is an unreal dream” (7230). However, Hand’s “unreal dream” is a reality for many. How does wrongful conviction occur, and why does it occur so frequently? And even more importantly, how can we prevent it?
2 First, we need to examine what “wrongful conviction” really means. According to legal scholar Michael Risinger, there are three categories. The first is “Conviction Despite Serious Legal Error.” In this case, a conviction is wrongful because a legal error was made (for example, the suspect’s home was [searched] without a warrant). The second category is “Conviction Despite Lack of Legal Culpability.” According to this definition, a conviction is wrongful because the convicted party was not legally culpable (for example, a crime was committed by someone with severe mental illness). The third definition is the most problematic: “Conviction Despite Factual Innocence.” In these cases, one of two things occurs: either no crime was committed, so there is no offender, or, more commonly, a crime was committed, but not by the convicted party (Risinger 762).
3 How can this happen? Although there are countless ways an investigation and trial can veer off course, most wrongful convictions occur for one or more of the following reasons: eyewitness misidentification, false confessions, jailhouse snitches, poor forensic science, government and prosecutorial misconduct, and ineffective counsel. If I’ve learned anything from TV crime shows, it’s that DNA is a powerful tool for convicting the guilty and exonerating the innocent. However, according to the National Registry of Exonerations, only 18 of the 91 exonerations in 2013 occurred due to DNA evidence, and the number of DNA exonerations decline annually (“Exonerations by Year”). So, although DNA evidence is an excellent tool for uncovering and proving wrongful convictions, its most effective use is uncovering the underlying causes of those wrongful convictions. It[’s] only through understanding the issues and mending the fissures in the criminal justice system that allow for them, that we can slow the rate of wrongful convictions in the United States.
4 The most common cause of wrongful conviction is mistaken eyewitness identification. Nearly three-quarters of wrongful convictions overturned through DNA testing were caused in part by incorrect eyewitness testimony (“Innocence Project”). In order to truly understand why this is the case, we need to look at how memory works. There are two kinds of human memory: short-term and long-term. Long-term memory involves the storage of memory which can later be retrieved (Green). This is the type of memory most often accessed in eyewitness identifications, and also the type that is most easily distorted.
5 Take the case of Ronald Cotton. In July 1984, a young woman named Jennifer Thompson was attacked and raped in her home. Thompson made a point to try and get a good look at her rapist. She turned on lights, making sure to see his face, and
immediately reported the crime to the police. Thompson was shown a photo array and informed that her assailant “may” be in the array. She identified Ronald Cotton, and the officer with her responded, “We thought this might be the one[”] (“Innocence Project”). Thompson was then shown a live lineup of seven men, including Cotton. Thompson struggled with the selection, but eventually picked out Cotton—the only man who appeared in both the photo array and live lineup. The police informed Thompson that she’d selected the same person as she had in the photo array. Based on these identifications and other circumstantial evidence, Cotton was convicted and sentenced to life in prison. Ten years later, in 1994, DNA evidence from the case exonerated Cotton. Now, Thompson and Cotton travel the country to speak about eyewitness misidentification (Thompson-Cannino et al.).
6 So, what happened here? Jennifer Thompson did everything in her power to be an excellent eyewitness, and she still misidentified Cotton. Eyewitness identification occurs because of two variables: system variables, which involve the criminal justice syst

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We have qualified writers to help you.

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!