Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
Introduction
The healthcare policy framework is a multidimensional phenomenon involving influence on patient care and expertise level among medical practitioners. According to research, different guidelines impact the local and international medical care delivery approach. One country that prominently appreciates the institutionalization of distinct values on people’s welfare is the US. The factor rendered the articulation of critical roles and responsibilities of the various administrative organs contributing to the affordable plan for the residents. Apt coordination among all stakeholders in the strategizing and implementation of the framework fosters a profound trickle-down effect of accrued benefits in the healthcare sector.
Argument
One significant factor that influences the quality of healthcare provided is the implemented models in various healthcare establishments. The Medicaid model gears the development of organizational culture in the healthcare institution. Therefore, it is essential that healthcare management focuses on developing an efficient model that boosts the quality and importance of healthcare services. The value-based healthcare model is profoundly innovative and fosters the interdisciplinary care delivery system (Halpren-Ruder, 2020). In this case, all stakeholders engage in establishing policies and mechanisms that enhance the care providers’ performance. Ideally, the compensation and rewarding of the healthcare institutions become subject to the performance through the number of patients with reduced cases of re-hospitalization.
Primarily, the value-based healthcare delivery system focuses on implementing policies that promote the provision of value and quality healthcare services. In this case, the providers get rewarded due to the increase in the number of new patient cases and a reduced re-hospitalization rate. As much as it benefits the nurses and the management to ensure that the care providers offer quality services, the patients reap the benefit of excellent amenities and effective treatment approaches. In most cases, the efficiency of the treatment involves increasing the participation of all stakeholders and procedures such as home care services and frequent follow-up strategies (Halpren-Ruder, 2020). Therefore, the patients establish a significant relationship with the care providers due to the integrated treatment approach that seeks to reduce the re-hospitalization rate.
The public health sector is an institution that significantly impacts human society’s cohesion, growth, and development. In this case, different stakeholders seek to participate in the implementation of the medical policies and their facilitation to boost its standards. The major partakers in the health sector encompass the government, the private sector, and non-governmental organizations (Kokko & Kork, 2021). Nevertheless, the federal, state and local administrations face an array of challenges in their roles in the public sector. The efficiency of the public health system heavily relies on the collaborative efforts between the authority and the private sector in developing and implementing regulations. Ideally, the critical role of the incumbency entails the creation of guidelines that promote the efficient delivery of health services.
One of the significant roles of the government involving policy implementation enshrines the facilitation of the development of effective medical-based tools. The establishment of efficient health facilities fosters the effective delivery of emergency services. In 2001, the US administration faced a significant challenge once there was a bioterrorism attack of anthrax through mail delivery services (Van de Goor et al., 2017). The medical facilities, namely the laboratories, faced the problem of managing the flow of sample tests to find the vaccination and cure. On the other hand, the authority encountered a significant hindrance in fostering efficient service delivery due to the protocol policy that all approaches should follow due process. Although the procedure promotes accountability in the decision-making process, it is a phenomenon that slows down the effectiveness and timeliness of the delivery of services.
It is the role of the federal, state, and local governments to assess the needs and status of the health institution. Ideally, it is paramount that the administration assesses the health establishments based on their staffing and availability. It is a means of ensuring that the public receives quality health services. Further, the assessment assists in determining the state of the healthcare workers. The level of services depends on the level of motivation of the healthcare workers (Khatoon, 2020). Therefore, it is essential that the government assesses both the health facility status and the workers to assert the standards of healthcare services.
The second part of the government is the development of policy. It is one of the roles that the administration faces a significant challenge, especially in integrating the practical and theoretical approach with the guidelines. One of the critical problems in the healthcare framework involves the abound consequences of the implementation of judgmental forecasting. Although the authority focuses on the general issues of policy implementation, it becomes a challenge to incorporate the healthcare workers’ input in the development process (Dash et al., 2019). As a result, the various stakeholders conflict regarding strategies and the relevance to the consequences of decisions made in the field.
The final role of the government involves enhancing the assurance to the public concerning the legitimacy of the Medicaid system. In this case, researchers postulate that the healthcare system’s credibility depends on the administration’s investment in assuring the public (Dash et al., 2019). If the executive lags in the implementation process, the community lacks confidence in the public healthcare system and prefers the private sector instead. Therefore, it is essential that the authority significantly fosters assertive measures to the public concerning the credibility of the healthcare system.
Counterargument
The policy decision is a multifaceted phenomenon that is highly affected by biases in its interpretation and implementation process. Halpern et al. (2020) argue that there are two significant forms of prejudice: technical and issue. Technical bias refers to utilizing the evidence without following scientific principles. The persistent use of subjective arguments disregards the objective facts approved by scientific experiments and baseline. Therefore, the central focus of technical bias ideology entails testing the fidelity of scientific facts. The other form of partisanship is the problem that refers to social values’ influence on the development of certain mythical constructs. Essentially, issue bias focuses on the justification of the social factors in disregarding certain policies, especially the concept of democratic representation.
Technical bias is a concept mainly utilized to interpret scientific factors such as health-based issues. In most cases, policymakers use the idea to enhance sustainability and minimize the costs incurred. Nevertheless, it is essential that policymakers appreciate the scientific facts based on the best health initiative due to the necessity of boosting health standards. Objective arguments rely on evidence to ascertain the concepts (Loftus et al., 2020). Over the decades, it has been a phenomenon that has rendered the emergence of issues related to the implementation of policies by health workers in real life. It is vital that policymakers focus on integrating scientific facts with the perceived argumentative constructs to enhance the effectiveness of policy implementation.
Issue bias is a concept regarding the dynamic influence of social factors on the development of policies. In most cases, people debate specific ideas based on the value derived from the engagements. With the aim of solving the issue of disagreements, individuals resolve to utilize democracy in the determination of the best alternatives. As a result, objective facts are compromised by the influence of social dynamism (Loftus et al., 2020). In essence, the social factor of justice through numbers alters the impact and significance of objective argumentative constructs. Therefore, issue bias is a significant threat to human society based on the actualization of consumptive social values such as unsustainable practices. Policymakers in the health sector focus on integrating social values and scientific facts to enhance the development of effective healthcare policies.
Conclusion
In conclusion, effective coordination among stakeholders in the healthcare sector boosts the positive impact of established action plans and shared benefits. In this case, there is a significant interdependent relationship between healthcare policies and the quality of services. On the one hand, the guidelines contribute to structuring medical-based operations and ethical practice among practitioners. On the other hand, the propositions feature biasness during the construct that intensifies the risks of effectiveness on treatment and recovery. The solution to the drawbacks of the development of the frameworks is establishing initiatives that promote all stakeholders’ participation in the implementation process. It is the mandate of the government to engage physicians, the community, and investors in elevating productive-driven strategies in the sector.
References
Dash, S., Shakyawar, S. K., Sharma, M., & Kaushik, S. (2019). Big data in healthcare: Management, analysis and future prospects. Journal of Big Data, 6(1), 1-25. Web.
Goldenberg, T., Reisner, S. L., Harper, G. W., Gamarel, K. E., & Stephenson, R. (2020). State policies and healthcare use among transgender people in the US. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 59(2), 247-259. Web.
Halpern, S. D., Truog, R. D., & Miller, F. G. (2020). Cognitive bias and public health policy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Jama, 324(4), 337-338. Web.
Halpren-Ruder, D. (2020). E-Health and healthcare quality management: Disruptive opportunities. Rhode Island Medical Journal, 103(1), 12-15. Web.
Khatoon, A. (2020). A blockchain-based smart contract system for healthcare management. Electronics, 9(1), 94. Web.
Kokko, P., & Kork, A. A. (2021). Value-based healthcare logic and their implications for Nordic health policies. Health Services Management Research, 34(1), 3-12. Web.
Loftus, T. J., Tighe, P. J., Filiberto, A. C., Efron, P. A., Brakenridge, S. C., Mohr, A. M., Rashidi, P., Upchurch, G., & Bihorac, A. (2020). Artificial intelligence and surgical decision-making. JAMA Surgery, 155(2), 148-158. Web.
Van de Goor, I., Hämäläinen, R.-M., Syed, A., Juel Lau, C., Sandu, P., Spitters, H., Karlsson, L.E., Dulf, D., Valente, A., Castellani, T., & Aro, A. R. (2017). Determinants of evidence use in public health policymaking: Results from a study across six EU countries. Health Policy, 121(3), 273-281. Web.
Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.