Government Restriction on the Internet

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Table of Contents

Introduction
First Claim and Evidence: Restriction for Teenage Welfare
Second Claim and Evidence: Censorship and Entertainment
Third Claim and Evidence: Restriction and Business Activities
Fourth Claim and Evidence: Restriction and Security
Conclusion
References

Introduction

The internet has formed the basis of everything regarding information, skills and techniques that are required for use by humans. The net has been proven to provide essential and non-beneficial content to users. The essay has been drafted to understand why they need for restrictions of the web and the benefits of the action. The restriction by the government has been enforced to promote the limitation of the content display that is only necessary for the user. It also analyses the effect of the media on the growing young population. The web regulator has put measures to control dangerous sites like drug and substance abuse sites, porn sites, and the negatively impacting entertainment sectors.

First Claim and Evidence: Restriction for Teenage Welfare

Many young people have majored in the net as their source of knowledge and entertainment. The government maintains control and warning over the destructive content and ensures prevention of the teen from consuming the adult concepts present on the web. According to (Potter & Goldsmith, 2017) many young people lack control over the social media platforms that are consumed for entertainment. Some social media platforms like Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, and Twitter have been majored on by teenagers (Alhabash & Ma, 2017). The web is a collective accumulation of different transactions, the relationship between people, and a site where any individual has the ability and freedom to express their natures and beliefs. Any person who uploads offensive information or material on the net without ensuring that the teen cannot access the content should be held accountable, and it is an offense, according to the law. The information should be made difficult to access by the teen until they attain the required age.

The definition and approach to the definition of speech have been argued upon. Some believe and feel that free speech has to cover all the essential areas, including entertainment, information and religion-based. It should not be of any negative impact to all the cadres. Others believe that internet users should control and limit the content they view or get entertained with. Government regulation has to be applied to only the sensitive areas and limited access for the teen. In addition, the control and management of the media platform have to be varied; parents and peers have to take part in the exercise.

In this perspective, parents should provide moral guidance, counselling and support to their children. They should offer control of how their kids utilize time on their internet and specifically direct them towards beneficial sites that impact their lives positively (Gerhart, 2017). The context explains that the internet is unlimited for all; it is a two-way thing that incorporates all to offer moral and effective guiding principles to teens. Since this may be the only long-lasting solution to children going through explicit content on the net, it acts as a method of inflicting sense on the kids.

Second Claim and Evidence: Censorship and Entertainment

The media has been used majorly for fun and leisure, and it is a worldwide thing. The entertainment sector has been regulated and controlled from exposing unnecessary content to the public. The most common is the theatre and the film sites that are managed depending on their display content. The control is accompanied by the thought of a violation of freedom of speech for filmmakers, the actors, distributors and those taking part as screenwriters. Many depend on the internet for the display of their content and as a method of earning income. For instance, the New York government in the United States enforced a law that it is acceptable to restrict destructive and unworthy entertainment to protect children from pornography and safeguard the adults population from consuming indecent materials. The challenge in the restriction is determining the link between the exploitative and non-exploitative (Uotila, 2017). The larger group argues that censorship has to be done for the teenage population, and adults have to make decisions regarding the programs. Entertainment programs are considered healthy when watched or listened to by the correct audience.

The government has also regulated the radio and television programs and designed to control of the content they broadcast. For instance, violence widely affects children’s character, and they tend to develop an unnecessary attitude. The adult may not be affected by the violence, but the content can be educative and encouraging. According to (Devictor & Do, 2017) the greatest challenge faced is that the larger population has been addicted to many online platforms, which affects the government in implementing the restriction programs. The majority are not selective of the content they are being entertained with. According to the research, much indecent material is commonly watched and consumed. The internet restriction has to be an individual choice, not a public decision, and the internet limits no one to access the content.

Third Claim and Evidence: Restriction and Business Activities

The internet has been the core source of income, ranging from larger to small businesses. The web has provided a forum for people to work, educate, and convert their content into money. Some of the activities that have been restricted include gambling activities, hindering extremist propaganda and limiting political freedom. Online business opportunities are either legal or illegal. Illegal businesses are put under government censorship to limit the level of exploitation. The commercial suppression of the online platform has beneficial factors. For instance, it creates room for local businesses to thrive and promote the growth of those who cannot access the internet. It also leads to the control and spread of fake news that can bring losses to many businesses.

Many people argue that online opportunities are there to benefit those willing. The control has to be implied to the suspected sites that seem to affect other professional actions. Online marketers and large companies are likely to have difficulty understanding their target customers when the intended audience’s IP addresses and personal identity have been tempered (Weingartner & Haring, 2020). For instance, in Turkey, Youtube has been banned, and the number of subscriptions destroyed; this led to a drop in the number of visitors from 50% to 24%, which led to the impact of many online commercial activities. This challenge leads to an increase in costs in the marketing sector.

The guiding principle to the restriction of online services and products have to be based on the accreditation and licensing by governmental professionals. Fraud cases and con artists have to be tracked down and the necessary measures taken against them. People who use the net for purchasing, selling, or acquiring materials have to choose legit programs to trade with. Training and awareness have to be conducted for the population to selectively choose the best online platforms that offer legit and profitable opportunities. Non-authorized activities have to be completely banned to reduce confusion among people and enable them to make the right choices in life. Legal actions need to be acted upon by those who violate the regulation and the set rules about web access. The government has the overall authority to suppress and destroy any commercial activity that is against the law.

Fourth Claim and Evidence: Restriction and Security

The net has been used as a means of threat to worldwide security. The repetitive attacks which occur in daily life happen as a result of unprotected national information. The government has the mandate to regulate the web and ensure that not all individuals can access national information. For example, the terrorism threat has led to concerns about security; the increased growth of modern technology has altered information protection. Specific sites should have limited access as per government laws; illegal obtaining of the data is regarded as a crime. The broadcasting of news and updates has to be restricted since it allows the terrorist or enemies to understand the pattern they are likely to attack. According to the Defence Regulation 3 of 1939, they prohibited releasing or distributing any information that could lead to a national security threat. Some advisory mechanisms were used that allowed the newspaper to contain personal guidance and control on the nature of the information it contained.

The suppression of global information has to be private unless a public emergency has occurred and needs to be handled before worse happens. In this perspective, the media must be allowed to perform its functions without being held back by any restrictions. It is because the whole globe depends on media personnel to deliver adequate and well-protected statistics. Many people suggest that the internet has to be banned to avoid terrorist attacks since they bring fear and confusion among the netizens (Enomoto & Douglas, 2019). These have been viewed as key factors in maintaining a strong link between public protection interests and the required public order. For instance, if there has to be control and regulation of the web, there should be openness and transparency concerning the set laws, written policies and well-defined national security (Dastyari, 2020). Lastly, the different nations have the total power and authority to control the net consumption, ensuring that only the required content is granted access.

Conclusion

The net is a massive component composed of all that individuals wish to know, and it is a world electronic library. It has positive and negative effects that affect different people in various ways. The government has to intervene and take part in the control of media where possible. The suppression of the internet is a two-way action, the government’s responsibility and the individual or personal objective. The negative effects have led to the development of interest in ready access and content publishing. The restrictions violate civil rights and freedom of expression, and there has to be a consensus about the area of expression. The lack of enough information in modern society leads to unawareness and content confusion.

The current society is moving to eradicate illiteracy which is the key factor to an open growing society, free from fraud and content privacy. The net has no limits, suppression acts help in protecting the culture, and at the same time, the lack of information should lead to illiteracy. The security of the internet is based on the nature of content displayed, the government ensures the censorship of the sites which are likely to lead to threats. Parents to take control of their kids and when it comes to using the internet. They should be on the move to ensure that children only benefit from educative and transformative content.

References

Alhabash, S., & Ma, M. (2017). A tale of four Platforms: Motivations and uses of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat among college students?Social Media + Society, 3(1), 205630511769154. Web.

Dastyari, A. (2020). Vitalizing international human rights law as legal authority: Freedom of expression enjoyed by Australian public servants and article 19 of the International covenant on civil and political rights.University of New South Wales Law Journal, 43(3). Web.

Devictor, X., & Do, Q. (2017). How many years have refugees been in exile?Population and Development Review, 43(2), 355-369. Web.

Gerhart, N. (2017). Technology addiction: How social network sites impact our lives.Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 20, 179-194. Web.

Potter, A., & Goldsmith, B. (2017). Reality’s children: Young people and factual entertainment television.Media International Australia, 164(1), 44-55. Web.

Uotila, J. (2017). Exploratory and exploitative adaptation in turbulent and complex Landscapes.European Management Review, 15(4), 505-519. Web.

Weingartner, P., & Haring, S. (2020). Children’s understanding of identity – The kind of referent that children have in mind when understanding identity arguments.Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(2), 51. Web.

Enomoto, C., & Douglas, K. (2019). Do Internet searches for Islamist propaganda precede or follow Islamist terrorist attacks?Economics & Sociology, 12(1), 233-247. Web.

Click Here To Order Now!