Genocide in Darfur Region: The Actual Cause of Sudanese Genocide

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Why do you believe genocide persists?

The true cause of Sudanese recent genocide in Darfur region is the same as were the causes for other genocides, which have taken place in Africa, after this continent has been liberated of “white oppression” – the inability of local populations to adjust their behavior to socially-appropriate norms. When European explorers had set their foot in Africa for the first time, they found locals indulging in never-ending tribal warfare and cannibalizing each other, as their most natural preoccupation. However, after the brief period of law and order in Africa has ended, the status quo in African countries has been reestablished – these countries are now rapidly descending back into primeval savagery, despite the fact that many Western politicians continue to refer to these countries as “developing”. Sudan is one of the African countries that are being affected by the problem of overpopulation the most.

This overpopulation has been caused by Sudanese Blacks’ preoccupation with making babies, despite the fact that they do not know even know how to farm the lands they claim to be theirs. Within a matter of last 20 years, the population of Sudanese Blacks had tripled and now it represents a particularly heavy demographic burden for this country. In its turn, Sudan’s government, which consists mostly of lighter-skinned representatives of country’s Arab community, could not come up with a better way of dealing with Blacks, then slaughtering them en masse. It is now being estimated that, ever since the beginning of Sudanese conflict in Darfur region in 2003, 450.000 Blacks have been killed, which in its turn, had prompted International Criminal Court (ICC) to demand the extradition of Sudan’s acting President Omar al-Bashir to Hague, in order for him to face the charges of genocide.

In the case of Darfur what interventions if any would you recommend that the president take?

It goes without saying that the practice of ethnic cleansing is morally repugnant, even if it is directed against Blacks, as it is the case in Sudan. Therefore, we would recommend Sudan’s President to consider more civilized methods of addressing Blacks’ existential inadequateness. For example, Sudanese government could begin popularizing the usage of contraceptives among its Black citizens, and if this policy would turn out as ineffective, the more resourceful methods of reducing their numbers could be utilized, such as subjecting Blacks to forced sterilization.

Also, Black citizens could be issued with a smallpox infected blankets, as it had been practiced by American government in 19^th century towards country’s Native populations. It is understood, of course, that in order for proposed measures to have a practical effect, all White Christian missioners and international “relief workers” would have to be expelled from Sudan, because it is namely due to their activities, during the course of last few decades, that the problem of overpopulation in Sudan has gained a status of priority. As in his book “The Death of the West”, Patrick J. Buchanan had put it: “Great folly of Christian doctrine was probably never as glaringly revealed as by the insane policies the Christian churches implemented in the Third World. These churches oppose contraception, sterilization, and abortion among their members. This results in exploding population growth which is further abetted by the medical care and food provided by the same churches” (Buchanan 2001). Therefore, we can describe the latest President’s initiative to kick international observers and the “lambs of God” out of the country as fully appropriate. Nowadays, it is only when Medias talk about a particular event, people believe that it really did happen. Therefore, if Western Medias did not stick their noses into what was happening in Sudan, the problem with country’s Blacks could have been effectively resolved long time ago, without triggering any kind of public controversy, whatsoever.

If this country were Panama would your recommendations be different?

If we consider a hypothetical possibility of Sudan turning into Panama, our recommendations as to what would Panama’s government have to do, while facing similar problem, would not be much different. This is because both: Sudan and Panama are Third World countries and it is namely the fact that these countries now enjoy independence, which causes their citizens’ living standards to sink ever-lower, as time goes by. In its turn, this can be explained by the fact that, ever since the end of “colonial era”, native people in former European colonies have been experiencing the lack of central authority. Nowadays, the civilizational attractiveness of just about any country directly corresponds to the percentile ratio of White people living in this country. The reason why today’s Haiti is nothing short of hell on Earth, is because Whites have been completely driven out of this country. Panama, on the other had, had retained a considerable number of Whites (descendants of Spanish colonists), which is why this country can be considered as quite attractive, by Third World standards. However, if a particular Panama’s non-White ethnicity would begin experiencing a birth boom, then we would recommend country’s government to utilize the same approaches to deal with the issue, as we have mentioned earlier, while coming up with proposals to Sudanese government. There is simply not enough room under the sun for all – people’s ability conceive as many as 20-30 kids per family, hardly qualifies them for such room, because it is namely one’s education and one’s willingness to act as a productive member of society, and not one’s skill in baby-making, which corresponds to his or her existential value, as individual.

Bibliography

Buchanan, P. 2001. The Death of the West: How Dying Populations and Immigrant Invasions Imperil Our Country and Civilization. New York, Thomas Dunne Books.

Power, S. “Dying in Darfur”. 2004. The New Yorker. Web.

Morse, D. “The Myth of ‘Darfur’”. 2007. Common Dreams.Org. Web.

Click Here To Order Now!

Genocide in Darfur Region: The Actual Cause of Sudanese Genocide

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We have qualified writers to help you.

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)