Functional requirementsValue 30%Submission method optionsAl

Functional requirementsValue: 30%Submission method optionsAlternative submission methodFurther BackgroundIn 2005 the Australian Government allocated $54 million to establish the National Youth Mental Health Foundation, later to be named headspace.“Our brief is to make sure services are available at the earliest possible point when problems emerge. The criteria to get help is pretty simple – you must be 12 – 25. That’s it.”Aimed to address the health and wellbeing concerns of young people by providing a holistic platform of care. This would give teenagers and young adults comfort that their support will be co-ordinated and integrated across primary and specialist care, and not just focus on the ‘illness’ but also social inclusion and recovery.Complete the FollowingPlease refer to the marking guide when preparing your response to see what criteria and standards will be used to assess your work and your progress.Consider that funding has been approved for a project to build a system that will capture the ‘story’ the first time it is told, and give access to successive professionals, so that case notes and the story can become enriched, and the young person can be assisted more appropriately. You are the business systems analyst assigned to the project, you will need to produce:Stakeholder mapDraw stakeholder role names on a stakeholder map with 4 quadrants, Internal-Operation, Internal-Executive, External-Operation, External-ExecutiveFor each stakeholder, describe why they have an interest in the project.QuestionnaireCreate a questionnaire that you would send to stakeholders with an aim to help you identify further details about the environment, the problem area and/or how the system would operate to help solve the problem.Identify which stakeholder group you are going to send the questionnaire toWrite an introduction statement that would go with the questionnaire explaining the purpose of the questionnaireWrite 10 questions, either open and/or closed ended questionsThis should be written as a questionnaire that could be distributedOnly write the questions, you should not write the answersUse Case diagram and descriptionsDraw a use case model for the information systemWrite brief Use Case description for each Use Case in the diagramWrite one fully developed Use Case description for one of the important Use Cases identified. Select an important Use Case that is key part of the system, not a basic simple Use Case.Rationaleapply stakeholder analysis for of an information system;describe and apply requirements gathering techniques;define functional requirementsMarking criteriaCriteriaHigh Distinction (HD)Distinction (DI)Credit (CR)Pass (PS)Fail (FL) 1.Stakeholder mapDemonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having researched/read more widely beyond the core materials. Clearly shows Stakeholder map.Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Clearly shows Stakeholder map.Demonstrates thorough understanding of material presented in core texts and readings. Shows Stakeholders.Demonstrates understanding of material presented in core texts and readings. Lists Stakeholders.Has not demonstrated understanding of material presented in core texts and readings. Stakeholders not listed or inappropriate.2.Questionnaire Maximum 5 Marks10 or more questions are stated that demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights to and awareness of many of the deeper more subtle aspects of the topic. Evidence of having read beyond the core material.7 or more questions are stated that demonstrates breadth of understanding and has insights to aspects of the topic. Evidence of having read the core material.5 or more questions are stated that demonstrates understanding. Evidence of having read the core material.3 or less questions stated, little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Basic knowledge of key principles and concepts.1 or less questions stated, very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Limited knowledge of key principles and concepts.3.Functional RequirementsMaximum 16 MarksUse Case Model and descriptions, including a critical core use case. Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having researched/read more widely beyond the core materials.Use Case Model and descriptions, including a critical core use case. Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of many of the deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having read beyond the core materials.Use Case Model and descriptions, including a critical core use case. Demonstrates thorough understanding of material presented in core texts and readings.Use Case Model and descriptions, including a critical core use case. Demonstrates evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. However literature is presented uncritically in a purely descriptive manner. Content acknowledged but not really taken into account.Use Case Model and descriptions, including a critical core use case. Demonstrates very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Inaccurate or inconsistent acknowledgment of sources.Limited knowledge of key principles and concepts.4.Presentation, writing style, grammar and referencesMaximum 4 MarksHighly developed skills in expression and presentation of response.Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task.Grammar and spelling accurate. Well-organised.Well-developed skills in expression and presentation of response.Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task.Grammar and spelling accurate.Good skills in expression and clear presentation of response.Mostly fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task.Grammar and spelling accurate.Some skills in expression and presentation of response.Meaning apparent but writing style not always fluent or well organised.Grammar and spelling contain errors.Rudimentary skills in expression and presentation of response.Not all material is relevant and/or is presented in a disorganised manner.Meaning apparent but writing style not fluent or well-organised,Grammar and spelling contain errors.PresentationYour answer should be approx. 5 pages, Times Roman size 12 (title page and references are not part of page count). You should use your own words and avoid lengthy quotations.

Functional requirementsValue 30%Submission method optionsAl

Functional requirementsValue: 30%Submission method optionsAlternative submission methodFurther BackgroundIn 2005 the Australian Government allocated $54 million to establish the National Youth Mental Health Foundation, later to be named headspace.“Our brief is to make sure services are available at the earliest possible point when problems emerge. The criteria to get help is pretty simple – you must be 12 – 25. That’s it.”Aimed to address the health and wellbeing concerns of young people by providing a holistic platform of care. This would give teenagers and young adults comfort that their support will be co-ordinated and integrated across primary and specialist care, and not just focus on the ‘illness’ but also social inclusion and recovery.Complete the FollowingPlease refer to the marking guide when preparing your response to see what criteria and standards will be used to assess your work and your progress.Consider that funding has been approved for a project to build a system that will capture the ‘story’ the first time it is told, and give access to successive professionals, so that case notes and the story can become enriched, and the young person can be assisted more appropriately. You are the business systems analyst assigned to the project, you will need to produce:Stakeholder mapDraw stakeholder role names on a stakeholder map with 4 quadrants, Internal-Operation, Internal-Executive, External-Operation, External-ExecutiveFor each stakeholder, describe why they have an interest in the project.QuestionnaireCreate a questionnaire that you would send to stakeholders with an aim to help you identify further details about the environment, the problem area and/or how the system would operate to help solve the problem.Identify which stakeholder group you are going to send the questionnaire toWrite an introduction statement that would go with the questionnaire explaining the purpose of the questionnaireWrite 10 questions, either open and/or closed ended questionsThis should be written as a questionnaire that could be distributedOnly write the questions, you should not write the answersUse Case diagram and descriptionsDraw a use case model for the information systemWrite brief Use Case description for each Use Case in the diagramWrite one fully developed Use Case description for one of the important Use Cases identified. Select an important Use Case that is key part of the system, not a basic simple Use Case.Rationaleapply stakeholder analysis for of an information system;describe and apply requirements gathering techniques;define functional requirementsMarking criteriaCriteriaHigh Distinction (HD)Distinction (DI)Credit (CR)Pass (PS)Fail (FL) 1.Stakeholder mapDemonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having researched/read more widely beyond the core materials. Clearly shows Stakeholder map.Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Clearly shows Stakeholder map.Demonstrates thorough understanding of material presented in core texts and readings. Shows Stakeholders.Demonstrates understanding of material presented in core texts and readings. Lists Stakeholders.Has not demonstrated understanding of material presented in core texts and readings. Stakeholders not listed or inappropriate.2.Questionnaire Maximum 5 Marks10 or more questions are stated that demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights to and awareness of many of the deeper more subtle aspects of the topic. Evidence of having read beyond the core material.7 or more questions are stated that demonstrates breadth of understanding and has insights to aspects of the topic. Evidence of having read the core material.5 or more questions are stated that demonstrates understanding. Evidence of having read the core material.3 or less questions stated, little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Basic knowledge of key principles and concepts.1 or less questions stated, very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Limited knowledge of key principles and concepts.3.Functional RequirementsMaximum 16 MarksUse Case Model and descriptions, including a critical core use case. Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having researched/read more widely beyond the core materials.Use Case Model and descriptions, including a critical core use case. Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of many of the deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having read beyond the core materials.Use Case Model and descriptions, including a critical core use case. Demonstrates thorough understanding of material presented in core texts and readings.Use Case Model and descriptions, including a critical core use case. Demonstrates evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. However literature is presented uncritically in a purely descriptive manner. Content acknowledged but not really taken into account.Use Case Model and descriptions, including a critical core use case. Demonstrates very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Inaccurate or inconsistent acknowledgment of sources.Limited knowledge of key principles and concepts.4.Presentation, writing style, grammar and referencesMaximum 4 MarksHighly developed skills in expression and presentation of response.Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task.Grammar and spelling accurate. Well-organised.Well-developed skills in expression and presentation of response.Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task.Grammar and spelling accurate.Good skills in expression and clear presentation of response.Mostly fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task.Grammar and spelling accurate.Some skills in expression and presentation of response.Meaning apparent but writing style not always fluent or well organised.Grammar and spelling contain errors.Rudimentary skills in expression and presentation of response.Not all material is relevant and/or is presented in a disorganised manner.Meaning apparent but writing style not fluent or well-organised,Grammar and spelling contain errors.PresentationYour answer should be approx. 5 pages, Times Roman size 12 (title page and references are not part of page count). You should use your own words and avoid lengthy quotations.