Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
The foundations of army leadership are based on levels and the characteristics of its leaders. Find out more in the essay below.
Introduction
In the Army, leadership is very important for the success of any institution depend on the leadership in charge. The Army cannot be victorious in facing the challenges of the present security environment without capable leaders. The Army leaders therefore, need to be swift, adaptive, and multi-skilled both in the country and across the world. An Army leader is therefore, anyone who by assumed responsibility or assigned duty inspires and shapes people to achieve organizational goals.
As any other leader, army leaders inspire people both inside and outside the series of authority to practice proceedings, focus thoughts, and shape decisions for the better of the organization. Leaders need to authorize subordinates to use their decisive thinking skills against allowing subordinates to become too reliant on lists or looking for plain direction prior to performing any act.
They have to be ready to take considered risks and acknowledge the likelihood that, soldiers may make errors. Foundations of army leadership include but not limited to history, loyalty, accountability, evolution, founding documents, and close alliance with the government.
Foundations
For success of any Army organization, there has to be strong and firm foundations on which the leadership stands. Army leadership hinges on history, loyalty to the Nations laws, accountability to authority, and evolving Army doctrine (Mostafa & Kay, 2006, p.143).
The application of this knowledge assertively and with devotion trains and establishes experts and multi-skilled leaders. Apart from their own responsibility of individual and professional competence, Army leaders also carry the responsibility of training their subordinates. The Army therefore has three classes of central leader competencies that enable leaders to grow competently at all levels of leadership: that is, lead, develop, and achieve. These competencies and their groups define the offices and roles of leadership.
The Army has organized founding documents and every Army Soldier and leader ought to be familiar with them. According to the Armys manual, the Army and its leadership requirements are based on the Nations democratic foundations, defined values, and standards of excellence (Mostafa & Kay, 2006, p.169).
However, the documents are flexible, due to revision emerging from the amendment of the U. S. constitution from time to time. By the time the Armys foundation manual was published, the Constitution had undergone twenty-seven amendments. This indicates that the government adapts to changes in the society.
The Army and the government have a very close and tight linkage. The Congress has the capacity to hoist and sustain the army while it is the armys responsibility to defend the states and its territories. Members of the Army vow solemn oaths to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic (Brownlee & Schoomaker, 2004, p.148). They also admit the power of the President as the Commander in Chief of the armed forces and that all his officers are his agents.
This ensures obedience of the Army to the authority of the President and his authority from any other aspect. It also gives the military the confidence to carry out their responsibilities with strength and without fear. Therefore, there is a mutual relationship between the government and the military.
As leaders exercise their command authority, they should consider the state of their subordinates. For instance, when dealing with tired, worn out or injured soldiers, the commander should use his/her wisdom to know how to command them because whatever he/she commands they will obey. In addition, in as much as the commanders have high authority over their subordinates, they should lead by example and be role models.
The Army leadership requirements model comprises an impeccable character, professional competence- knowledge, study, preparation and application. Empathy, values and warrior ethos are the three elements that underscore a leaders character.
Some of these characters might be innate; however, character development through apprenticeship, experience and training instills long-term character that goes long way in ensuring effective leadership. Without these qualities, one does not qualify to lead, but in the presence of these qualities, victorious leadership is inevitable, and wise leadership results thereafter.
Competencies are core leadership values built by studying, personal efforts, training, and experience. They give plain and reliable means passing on expectations for the Army leaders. Competencies improve with time and experience especially in complex situations. Commanders improve these competencies by carrying out assigned duties and responsibilities. Competent leaders take every available opportunity to learn and improve.
Conclusion
In conclusion, strong and firm leadership in the Army is of great importance, because it is from it that future leaders also develop. Upcoming leaders under the tutelage of successful leaders become efficient for they implement what they learn from their mentors.
A good leader therefore, is a leader of character, with presence, intelligent, competent, one who has the ability to influence his subordinates and able to easily adapt to changes. Training forms an integral part of army leadership; nevertheless, experience counts and this result from continued mentoring leaders through apprenticeship. With the right leadership, the Army is confident of victory.
References
Brownlee, L., & Schoomaker, P. (2004). Parameters. US Army War College Quarterly, 34(2): 140-170.
Mostafa, R., & Kay, P. (2006). World Military Leaders: A Collective and Comparative Analysis. Westport: Praeger Publishers.
Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.