Finance of the AGCO CORP

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!

Introduction

Farming has a great history. This can be traced from the earliest man’s endeavor in farming in what is referred to as the land between. There, man stopped relying on hunting sorely for consumption but also planted crops. This was done with the most naïve means. There was no equipment that is common in the current agricultural businesses. Moreover, man did not keep a record of what he farmed. This characterized the early farming and can be traced to as late as the twenty first century. Even with the modernization of farming activities, there are still some people who look at farming only for subsistence. Others are still using the tools that are not up to date. This is due to various reasons. One of the main reasons is poverty and other ignorance.

This not withstanding, there have come up many companies that have taken the advantage of the rise in technology in various fields and have brought it to the farming industry. These companies have brought a major transition to the industry making it as enjoyable as any other industry. The farming industry was one of the least popular to people in the rise of technology. The persons here mentioned have placed their inputs in the area of; physical farming, management, research, production of farming facilities like machinery, fertilizers and seeds, also there are those who have been earning a living from the brokerage of the farm products (Books LLC, 12).

As man continued to advance in his farming, the need to have a record of his stocks arose. The first to be in record were flocks. A man could easily count his flocks be they cattle, sheep, camels, and others. Land which was cultivated was marked by physical; features like mountains, rivers, and such. In most cases, land was earlier owned communally. As the technology came in place, the need to improve the recording came to being. Thus man kept a record manually of his stocks in a way he could be able to calculate his profits. This has later been phased out by the introduction of computers in the wake of the information technology. This field has continued to grow by the day. Currently, companies in the magnitude of AGCO CORP employ their own system developers who carry out a research and later come up with programs that are specifically suited to operate the functions that are carried out by the companies. These systems are commonly referred as the tailor made systems. The other option available is the off-the-shelves systems. These are systems that are made so that they can operate ion different fields. Such systems are available both locally and also in the internet (Books LLC, 12).

Due to the rise in need to create wealth, both national and international authorities have set some standards which have to be followed by any company. These standards are the ones that govern the industries in question. In the finance department, it is mandatory for every company to publish their financial records annually. This helps any investor and other interested parties to make informed decisions in their investments. The publishing of financial records started manually, and then by the twenty first century the companies post their financial statements both on print media as well as in their websites. The records that are contained in this report are from the records of AGCO CORP website. The analysis that is done covers the time between 2008 and 2010. Forecasts for the year 2011 are also made.

The company

The history of AGCO CORP is dated as back as 1990. The American company came from investors who were the previous owners of yet another farm equipment company known as Duetz-Allis. This was a subsidiary of KDH a bigger farm equipment manufacturer. Prior to this, the KHD had made a major investment by acquiring farm equipment from Allis- Charmers. This was five years before. The AGCO CORP Company has since grown to be an international company that has branches in all the continents. However, the company is run from its headquarters that are located in New York City in America. In its history of operations, the company has gained customer portfolio in over one hundred and twenty countries. In each of these countries, the company has established offices and in some areas the company has countries operated form one regional office. However, that is only the managerial part of it. Due to the demand in the competitive market, the company has been able to sustain its position as the leading marketer in the farm inputs because of various factors. One, the company has been involving directly and indirectly the customers in their production and improvement of the equipment. This has made the customer to feel that they own part of that company. This is done through interactive process in their researches. The regional and national offices use their personnel to help the customers fill the questionnaire about their products. The questionnaires help the company to know the changes that the customers want done in their products (Hanrahan, Ramsay, Stapleton, 21).

After the formation, the company went on to acquire many plants from different organizations. The first purchase was that of a hay and forage equipment form Hesston corporation. The seller had a control of half of the shares in Case international. This meant that by a acquiring their equipment, the AGCO corp. had already a ready market form the popularity of the Case International. The asset acquisition went on and in 1993 the company acquired yet another plant. This time it was the distribution rights of the Massey Fergusson in the northern part of America. The brand was already popular to the farmers in that part. The next year saw the company acquire a tractor- McConnell Tractors (Hanrahan, Ramsay, Stapleton, 23). The same year, the company proceeded to buy a line of equipment called the black line. This is just a summary of the success story. To attain this, AGCO CORP has gone through various financial handles. There have been high as well as low seasons for the company. The profits have seen the company save so as to have something to use in times of the losses. An analysis of the financial records between the year 2008 and 2010 is a clear evidence of the un-uniformity tat the company has had to do with in its history of operations.

Table 1, AGCO CORP Balance Sheet, December 31 ($ in thousands)

Vertical Analysis (Common Size Factors)
Actual Forecast
2008 2009 2010 2011
Amount % Amount % Amount % Amount %
Assets
Cash $512 10.34% $651 13.03% $720 13.24% $740 17.17%
Accounts Receivable 816 16.46% 725 14.51% 909 16.71% 950 22.04%
Inventory 1,390 28.05% 1,157 23.14% 1,234 22.69% 270 6.26%
Other Current Assets 288 5.80% 215 4.30% 259 4.77% 0 0.00%
Current Assets 3,005 60.65% 2,749 54.98% 3,121 57.40% 1,960 45.48%
Land, Buildings, Plant, & Equipment (Gross) 811 16.37% 910 18.20% 925 17.01% 950 22.04%
Accumulated Depreciation 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%
Net Fixed Assets 811 16.37% 910 18.20% 925 17.01% 950 22.04%
Other Non-Current Assets 1,139 22.98% 1,340 26.81% 1,391 25.59% 1,400 32.48%
Total Assets $4,955 100.00% $4,999 100.00% $5,437 100.00% $4,310 100.00%
Liabilities
Short-term Bank Loans $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Accounts Payable 1,027 20.73% 622 12.43% 683 12.55% 700 16.24%
Accruals 800 16.14% 809 16.18% 883 16.24% 890 20.65%
Other Current Liabilities 152 3.06% 239 4.77% 347 6.39% 360 8.35%
Current Liabilities 1,979 39.93% 1,669 33.39% 1,913 35.18% 1,950 45.24%
Long-term Bank Loans 625 12.61% 454 9.08% 443 8.15% 460 10.67%
Mortgages 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%
Long-term Debt 625 12.61% 454 9.08% 443 8.15% 460 10.67%
Other Non-Current Liabilities 331 6.69% 474 9.47% 422 7.76% 2,600 60.32%
Total Liabilities $2,935 59.23% $2,597 51.94% $2,778 51.09% $5,010 116.24%
Owner’s Equity
Common Stock (1.55 billion shares) $1 0.02% $1 0.02% $1 0.02% $1 0.02%
Retained Earnings 1,382 27.89% 1,518 30.36% 1,738 31.97% 1,786 41.44%
Owner’s Equity 1,067 21.54% 1,051 21.03% 1,062 19.53% 1,120 25.99%
Total Liabilities & Owner’s Equity $4,002 80.77% $3,648 72.97% $3,840 70.62% $6,130 142.23%

Income Vertical

Table 2, AGCO CORP Income Statement

Vertical Analysis (Common Size Factors)
Actual Fcst
2008 2009 2010 2011
Net Sales $8,273 100.00% $6,516 100.00% $6,897 100.00% $0
Cost of Goods Sold 6,775 81.89% 5,445 83.55% 5,638 81.75% 0
Gross Margin 1,498 18.11% 1,072 16.45% 1,259 18.25% 0
General & Administrative Expenses 721 8.71% 630 9.67% 692 10.04% 0
Depreciation 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Miscellaneous Expenses 214 2.58% 223 3.42% 242 3.51% 0
Total Operating Expenses 935 11.30% 853 13.09% 934 13.55% 0
Total Operating Inc/(Loss) 564 6.81% 219 3.36% 324 4.70% 0
Non Operating (Inc)/Expense, net 52 0.63% 64 0.99% 49 0.71% 0
Income Before Interest & Taxes 512 6.18% 154 2.37% 275 3.99% 0
Interest (Inc)/Expense, net 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Net Income before Taxes 512 6.18% 154 2.37% 275 3.99% 0
Taxes 164 1.99% 58 0.89% 104 1.51% 0
Net Income after Taxes 347 4.20% 97 1.48% 171 2.48% 0
Dividends on Common Stock (39) -0.47% (39) -0.59% (50) -0.72% 0
Other Adjustments 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Net Income $386 4.66% $135 2.08% $220 3.20% $0
(1) If adjustment is an addition to Net Income, insert as a negative number.
(2) Must agree with Net Income appearing on your sourced financials.

Balance Horizontal

Table 3, AGCO CORP Balance Sheet, December 31 ($ in thousands)

Horizontal Analysis
Net Change in 2009 Net Change in 2010 Net Change in 2011
2008 2009 $ % 2010 $ % 2011 $ %
Actual Actual Amount Incr/(Decr) Actual Amount Incr/(Decr) Fcst Amount Incr/(Decr)
Assets
Cash $546 $651 $105 0.19 $720 0.00 $740 $20 0.03
Accounts Receivable 816 725 -90 (0.11) 909 183 0.25 950 42 0.05
Inventory 1,390 1,157 -233 (0.17) 259 -898 (0.78) 270 11 0.04
Other Current Assets 254 215 -39 (0.15) 0 -215 (1.00) 0 0
Current Assets 3,005 2,749 -257 (0.09) 1,888 -930 (0.34) 1,960 73 0.04
Land, Buildings, Plant, & Equipment (Gross) 811 910 99 0.12 925 15 0.02 950 25 0.03
Accumulated Depreciation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Net Fixed Assets 0 910 910 925 950 25 0.03
Other Non-Current Assets 1,139 1,340 202 0.18 13,914 12,574 9.38 1,400 (12,514) (0.90)
Total Assets $4,144 $4,999 $855 0.21 $16,726 $4,310 ($12,416) (0.74)
Liabilities
Short-term Bank Loans $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Accounts Payable 1,027 644 (383) (0.37) 683 38 0.06 700 17 0.03
Accruals 800 622 (178) (0.22) 883 262 0.42 890 7 0.01
Other Current Liabilities 152 1,047 896 5.91 347 (700) (0.67) 360 13 0.04
Current Liabiities 1,979 2,313 335 0.17 1,913 (401) (0.17) 1,950 37 0.02
Long-term Bank Loans 0 454 454 443 (11) (0.02) 460 17 0.04
Mortgages 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Long-term Debt 625 454 (171) (0.27) 443 (11) (0.02) 460 17 0.04
Other Non-Current Liabilities 331 473 142 0.43 2,335 1,861 3.93 2,600 265 0.11
Total Liabilities $2,935 $3,241 $306 0.10 $4,690 $1,450 0.45 $5,010 $320 0.07
Owner’s Equity
Common Stock (1.55 billion shares) $1 $1 $0 $1 $0 0.00 $0 ($1) (1.00)
Retained Earnings 1,382 1,518 136 0.10 1,738 221 0.15 1,786 48 0.03
Owner’s Equity 1,067 1,062 136 0.13 1,051 221 0.21 1,120 47 0.04
Total Liabilities & Owner’s Equity $4,002 $4,302 $441 0.11 $5,742 $1,670 0.39 $6,130 $367 0.06

Income Horizontal

Table 4, AGCO CORP Income Statement

Horizontal Analysis
Actual Forecast
2008 2009 2008 vs 2009 2010 2009 vs 2010 2011 2010 vs 2011
Change Change Change
$ +/(-) % +/(-) $ +/(-) % +/(-) $ +/(-) % +/(-)
Net Sales $8,273 $6,516 ($1,757) (0.21) $6,897 $380 0.06 $0 ($6,897) (1.00)
Costs of Goods Sold 6,775 5,445 (1,330) (0.20) 5,638 193 0.04 0 (5,638) (1.00)
Gross Profit 1,498 1,072 (427) (0.28) 1,259 187 0.17 0 (1,259) (1.00)
General & Administrative Expenses 721 630 (91) (0.13) 692 62 0.10 0 (692) (1.00)
Depreciation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Miscellaneous Expenses 214 233 19 0.09 242 9 0.04 0 (242) (1.00)
Total Operating Expenses 935 863 (72) (0.08) 935 71 0.08 0 (935) (1.00)
Total Operating Inc/(Loss) 564 209 (355) (0.63) 324 116 0.55 0 (324) (1.00)
Non Operating (Inc)/Expense, net 52 54 2 0.04 23 (32) (0.58) 0 (23) (1.00)
Income Before Interest & Taxes 511 154 (357) (0.70) 301 147 0.95 0 (301) (1.00)
Interest (Inc)/Expense, net 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Net Income before Taxes 511 154 (357) (0.70) 301 147 0.95 0 (301) (1.00)
Taxes 164 58 (107) (0.65) 104 47 0.81 0 (104) (1.00)
Net Income after Taxes 347 97 (250) (0.72) 197 100 1.04 0 (197) (1.00)
Dividends on Common Stock 4 1 (3) (0.65) 2 1 0.62 0 (2) (1.00)
Other Adjustments 92 92 1 0.01 93 1 0.01 0 (93) (1.00)
Net Income $251 $95 (156) (0.62) $195 99 1.04 $0 (99) (0.51)
(1) If adjustment is an addition to Net Income, insert as a negative number.
(2) Must agree with Net Income appearing on your sourced financials.
AGCO CORP Financial ratios
2008 2009 2010 2011 – Fcst Year
Liquidity Ratios
a) Current ratio: (times)
Current assets = $3,005 $2,749 $3,121 $3,150
Current liabilities = $1,979 $1,718 $1,913 $2,000
Result = 1.519 1.600 1.632 1.575
b) Quick ratio: (times)
Quick assets = $3,005 $2,749 $3,121 $3,150
Current liabilities = $1,979 $1,718 $1,913 $2,000
Result = 1.519 1.600 1.632 1.575
Leverage Ratios
c) Debt-to-total assets ratio: (%)
Total Debt = $2,935 $2,596 $2,778 $2,960
Total Assets = $4,955 $5,062 $5,437 $5,520
Result = 0.592 0.513 0.511 0.536
d) Times-interest-earned ratio: (times)
Profit before interest and taxes = $564 $219 $324 $398
Total interest charges = $32 $42 $33 $37
Result = 17.561 5.195 9.736 10.757
Asset Management Ratios
e) Inventory turnover ratio: (times)
(cost basis)
Cost of Goods Sold = $6,775 $5,445 $5,638 $6,001
Inventory of Finished Goods = $1,390 $1,157 $1,234 $1,283
Result = 4.874 4.707 4.571 4.677
f) Inventory turnover ratio: (times)
(sales basis)
Sales = $8,273 $6,516 $6,897 $6,999
Inventory of Finished Goods = $1,390 $1,157 $1,234 $1,283
Result = 5.952 5.634 5.591 5.455
g) Fixed asset turnover ratio: (times)
Sales = $8,273 $6,516 $6,897 $6,999
Fixed assets = $1,950 $2,250 $2,316 $2,400
Result = 4.243 2.896 2.978 2.916
h) Total asset turnover ratio: (times)
Sales = $8,273 $6,516 $6,897 $7,300
Total assets = $4,955 $5,062 $5,437 $5,520
Result = 1.670 1.287 1.268 1.322
i) Average collection period: (days)
Accounts Receivable = $816 $8,273 $725 $6,516 $909 $6,897 $932 $6,999
Average Daily Sales = 22.981 ← 360 days 18.101 ← 360 days 19.157 ← 360 days 19.442 ← 360 days
Result = 35.490 40.064 47.423 47.938
Debt Management Ratios:
j) Accounts Payable: (days)
Accounts Payables = 1027.1 621.6 682.6 701
Cost of Sales = 6774.7 ← 365 days 5444.5 ← 365 days 5637.9 ← 365 days 5800 ← 365 days
Result = 55.33699 41.67215 44.19181 44.11466
Profitability Ratios
k) Profit Margin: (%)
Earnings after taxes = $347 $97 $171 $198
Sales = $8,273 $6,516 $6,897 $7,300
Result = 4.196% 1.484% 2.472% 2.712%
l) Return on total assets: (%)
Earnings after taxes = $347 $97 $171 $198
Assets = $4,955 $5,062 $5,437 $5,520
Result = 7.005% 1.910% 3.136% 3.587%
m) Return on owner’s equity: (%)
Earnings after taxes = $347 $97 $171 $198
Equity = $2,014 $2,393 $2,658 $2,800
Result = 17.232% 4.041% 6.414% 7.071%
n) Gross Profit Margin: (%)
Gross profit = $512 $154 $275 $303
Sales = $8,273 $6,516 $6,897 $7,300
Result = 6.183% 2.369% 3.986% 4.151%
o) Dividend pay-out ratio: (%)
Dividend = $4 $1 $2 $3
After tax earnings = $347 $97 $171 $198
Result = 1.213% 1.468% 1.396% 1.404%

Ratios

Table 5, AGCO CORP Ratios Analyses December 31 ($ in thousands)

2008 2009 2010 2011 – Fcst Industry Competitor
Liquidity Ratios
Current Ratio 1.52 1.60 1.63 1.58 0 0
Quick Ratio 1.52 1.60 1.63 1.58 0 0
Leverage Ratios
Debt Ratio (%) 59.23 51.29 51.09 53.62 0.00 0.00
Times-interest-earned 17.56 5.19 9.74 10.76 0 0
Asset Management Ratios
Inventory Turnover (costs) 4.87 4.71 4.57 4.68 0 0
Inventory Turnover (selling) 5.95 5.63 5.59 5.46 0 0
Fixed Asset Turnover 4.24 2.90 2.98 2.92 0 0
Total Asset Turnover 1.67 1.29 1.27 1.32 0 0
Average Collection Period (days) 35.49 40.06 47.42 47.94 0 0
Debt Management Ratios
Accounts Payable (days) 55.34 41.67 44.19 44.11 0 0
Profitability Ratios
Profit margin (%) 4.20 1.48 2.47 2.71 0.00 0.00
Return on Total Assets (%) 7.01 1.91 3.14 3.59 0.00 0.00
Return on Owner’s Equity (%) 17.23 4.04 6.41 7.07 0.00 0.00
Gross Profit Margin (%) 6.18 2.37 3.99 4.15 0.00 0.00
Dividend Pay-Out Ratio (%) 1.21 1.47 1.40 1.40 0.00 0.00

Financial Ratios

Form the above table; it is clear that the fall experienced by the company in 2009 has affected its performance greatly. It is however notable that the company came up in 2010 and the ratios show that the performance of the company that year was greater than the results of 2008. (AGCO CORP). Different financial ratios are interpreted differently as we shall find in the sections below. The most important of all is the financial ratios. This is one of the determinants of the future of the company in the business. Rise and fall of any of the ratios is interpreted differently. For example, the rise in the liquidity ratio explains increase in strength of the business future while a rise in debt utilization ratio explains that the borrowed capital has been utilized in a better way.

Liquidity Trend

The liquidity trend explains how fast a company is able to transform its assets into profit. This is explained by the trend in liquidity ratio. This has been rising from 1.52 in 2008, to 1.60 in 2009 and 1.63 in 2010. The prevailing circumstances show that there might be a drop in 2011. This implies that the company has been able to trade in a good way in the last three years. The liquidity ratio determines the future of the company. The ratios suggest that the company will continue in operations in the next foreseeable future.

Asset Utilization Trend

The return on total asset of 7.01 in 2008 was also affected by the low season in 2009. This was reduced to 1.91 in 2009. The company improved on this and gained 3.14 in 2011. A rise is further expected in 2011 (AGCO CORP). the fixed assets are n9on consumables in the business. However, in that revenue was used to purchase them, it means that they have to be utilized to bring in more revenue. Thus a rise in this ratio shows that the fixed assets are able to pay them selves back. Unutilized fixed assets always lead to low ratios.

Debt Utilization Trend

It is always good for the strategic managers to have proper utilization of the debt so that the debt can be paid back in good time and having met the purpose for which it was acquired. This the company did in 2008 with the debt ratio been 59.23. The company has been working effectively to reduce this ratio with results of 51.29 and 51.09 being recorded in 2009 and 2010 respectively. The borrowed capital has to be paid in good time so that the company can be able to acquire another loan and also enjoy the benefits or the borrowed capital. Good management requires that within the stipulated payback time, the company will have already paid back the monies and have revenue from the same borrowed capital. This is regardless of whether the debt came in liquid or asset form. The debt that comes in asset form affects the asset utilization trend.

Strategic Intent / Financing Plan

The use of revenue is used to determine the financing plan. From the balance sheet, the allocation of revenue to payout dividend is one of the determinants of this performance. While the company paid 1.27 5 in 2008, this rose to 1.47 in 2009 and fell to 1.4 in 2010. The company is expected to have the same ratio in the year 2011. the strategic plan foresees te future of the business. It comes after a combination of different ratios. The strategic managers will always look forward to maintain the business in operation for as long as possible. This will always attract more investors and earn the company customer confidence. The return on total assets which we have seen fall in 2009 may have affected the prospect investors. This has however been rectified in the succeeding years and is expected to be rectified further in 2011.

Profitability Trend

The fall in 2009 affected greatly the profitability trend in the company. The 4.0 profit margin the company had in 2008 was dropped to a mere 1.48 in 2009. However, the company rose to 2.47 in 2010 and is expected to rise further and reach 2.71 in 2011. The profitability margin always shows the relationship between the sales and the gross profit. This is explains whether the turnover is a revolving revenue or it is earning the company the desired results. The re-bounce into profitable trend in 2010 explain improved profit within the turn over.

(AGCO CORP)

Works Cited

2011, Web.

Books LLC. Agco: Massey Ferguson, Gleaner Manufacturing Company, Fendt, White Farm Equipment, Valtra, Gleaner A85. Author, 2010.

Hanrahan, Pamela, Ramsay Ian, Stapleton Geof. Commercial applications of company law 2011. New York: Amazon, 2011.

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!