Fallacies about Tradition and Modernity

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!

The journal discusses the relationship between tradition and modernity as used in the theory of social change. With a particular focus on the Indian community, the author identifies seven fallacies regarding these two intertwined concepts. One of the misconceptions is that new changes replace old traditions (Gusfield, 1967). People often hold the erroneous belief that the birth of one culture effectively substitutes the older one.

They also assume that a novel product, religion, or decision-making method will supersede the previous one. However, the author suggests that the latest versions of something increase the alternatives available to the community. For instance, magic and medicine, which are considered tradition and modernity respectively, are used complementarily. Two religions can also exist in syncretism within one community (Gusfield, 1967). Debunking this myth shows that introducing an element of modernity within a society does not necessarily displace tradition. Instead, the two are likely to interact with one another, as seen in the examples provided.

Another fallacy that the author discusses is that developing society is static. It is flawed to believe that traditional society has not evolved in the past. For instance, India was influenced by British culture, Islam religion, and certain socio-cultural movements during different periods.

Even India’s caste system has been altered in the past, which shows that no component is fixed (Gusfield, 1967). The author further illustrates this point by discussing how India evolved into an agricultural community rather than an industrial one. The British protectionism over their textile industry resulted in the decline of the local Indian enterprises, and consequently, their society shifted from industrial work to agriculture (Gusfield, 1967). This underscores the point that tradition has always embraced meaningful transformation instead of being unchanging as commonly believed. By demystifying these fallacies, the journal shows the real relationship between tradition and modernity.

Reference

Gusfield, J. R. (1967). . American journal of sociology, 72(4), 351-362. Web.

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!