Ethical Relativism in Business

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Ethical relativism is a methodological principle of moral interpretation based on the claim that moral ideas and concepts are only relative and contingent. It leads to the denial of the possibility of creating scientific ethics (Dean, 2021). Its supporters do not see the dependence of morality on social conditions, and even fewer can understand the essence of objective historical laws that determine it. Ethical relativism manifested itself vividly in the teachings of the skeptics, then in the followers of Mandeville. It is also inherent in some modern bourgeois movements in philosophy: existentialism and pragmatism. For example, Ayer and Carnap find it impossible even to raise the question of the rightness or wrongness of moral evaluation.

The first reason why companies outsource tasks is that outsourcing reduces business costs. A company does not have to pay for maintaining jobs or training employees, which is somewhat controversial from an ethical point of view. It turns out that managers are guided solely by the financial component of the issue, ignoring the righteous mission of providing people with high-paying jobs. In addition, outsourcing allows one to focus on business development (Top 4 reasons why companies outsource, 2022). Guided by the principles of ethical relativism, executives may conclude that routine tasks take up too much time. They are better left to the people who need the work and the money, while highly skilled professionals handle the complex tasks. However, for contractors who agree to do the task, such work is primarily one-time and does not allow them much money, so this outsourcing decision is ethically questionable.