Effects of Gender in Education

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Table of Contents

Resources
Methodology
References

Resources

Burns-Glover, A.L. & Veith, D.J. (1995). Revisiting gender and teaching evaluation. Sex still makes a different. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality: Special Issue: Gender in the workplace, 10(6), 69-80. (Empirical).

Campbell, P. B. & Sanders, J., (1997). Uninformed but interested: Findings of a national survey on gender equity in preservice teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 48(1), 69-75. (Empirical).

Centra, J.A. & Gaubatz, N.B.,(2000). Is there gender bias in student evaluation of teaching? Journal of Higher Education, 71(1), 17-33 (Empirical).

Laird, T. N., Niskodé, A., & Garver, A., (2007). Gender Gaps: Understanding Teaching Style Differences Between Men and Women. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Institutional Research, June 2 –6. Kansas City, MO. (Empirical).

Lockheed, M., (1985). Sex equity in classroom organization and climate. In S. Klein (Ed.), Handbook for achieving sex equity through education (189-217). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. ED 290 810.

Kardia, D.B., & Wright, M.C., (2004). Instructor identity: The impact of gender and race on faculty experiences with teaching. Occasional Paper. University of Michican Center for Research on Learning and Teaching.

Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1994). Failing at fairness: How America’s schools cheat girls. New York: Macmillan Publishing. ED 386 268.

Statham, A. Richardson, L. & Cook, J.A. (1991).Gender and university teaching: A negotiated difference. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Starbuck G., 2003. College Teaching Styles by Gender. Paper Presented at the Western Social Science Association Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada.

Streitmatter, J. (1994). Toward gender equity in the classroom: Everyday teachers’ beliefs and practices. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. ED 367 739.

Methodology

Sadker & Sadker (1994) have illustrated the effects of gender on the educational experiences of the students. The literature review examines the co-relation between gender and the teaching process in classrooms. The researcher employed various methods for tracing and retrieving the data for the literature review and referred to the four steps recommended by Gall, Gall, and Borg (1999) for the literature review process, including searching preliminary resources, the use of secondary sources, the thorough reading of the primary sources and the incorporation of all the literature.

The researcher initiated the search from the Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC) and numerous dissertation abstracts by typing the keywords: gender, sex, impact of gender on education, co-relation between gender and teaching practices, gender and teaching.

Apart from the database searches, the researcher also used the internet search engines including the Yahoo and Google to find and retrieve extra preliminary and secondary sources which provided numerous links to the required literature review. Following this, the researcher selected the most suitable articles and books (Galvan, 1999) which could be used for the studying the impact of gender socialization on the education of the students in classrooms.

References

Gall, J. P., Gall, M. D., & Borg, W. R. (1999). Applying educational research. New York: Longman.

Galvan, J. L. (1999). Writing literature reviews: A guide for students of the social and behavioral sciences. Los Angeles, CA: Pyrczak.

Click Here To Order Now!

Effects of Gender in Education

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We have qualified writers to help you.

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)