Each student will write a literature review of NOT more than

Each student will write a literature review of NOT more than 1500 words. The review shoulddemonstrate that the student has thoroughly researched their topic. Students should useexamples of business practice from the scholarly journals papers, conferences, books andprofessional magazines to support their argumentsThe literature review would be on accounting software/packages used in Australia. Theresearch would cover history, development and adoption, the current market size, identifythe leaders in the market and what gives them the competitive advantage. Students are alsorequired to identify the current gaps or challenges encountered by users or customers ofaccounting software/packages and make relevant suggestions or recommendations.Research reports are to be presented in hard copy in size 12 Times New Roman or 10 CalibriFont and double spaced. The research should include a list of at least 5 references used inthe research report and a bibliography of the wider reading done to familiarize oneself withthe topic.Submission: Hard-copy to tutors/lecturers assignment box and a copy of the reportgenerated from SAFE ASSIGN attached to it.You are reminded to read the “Plagiarism” section of the course description. Your researchshould be a synthesis of ideas from a variety of sources expressed in your own words.All reports must use the Harvard referencing style. Marking rubrics are attached.HI5019 STRATEGIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS T3 2016Assessment Criteria:Score Very Good Good Satisfactory UnsatisfactoryPresentationand writing style/15 marksInformation is wellorganized. Correct layoutincluding times new roman,font size 12 or calibri, fontsize10, double spaced.About the right length.Very well written, excellentparaphrasing and propergrammar and punctuationare used throughout.Information isorganized, Correctlayout including timesnew roman, font size12 or calibri, fontsize10, doublespaced. About theright length.Well written, someparaphrasing andproper grammar andpunctuationInformation issomewhatorganized,Some elementsof layout orlength incorrect.Proper grammarand punctuationmostly used,but overuse ofdirect quotes.Information ispoorly organized,Some elements oflayout or lengthincorrect.Proper grammarand punctuationnot always used.Excessive overuseof direct quotesIntroduction/15 marksIntroduces the topic of theresearch report in anextremely engaging mannerwhich arouses the reader’sinterest.Gives a detailed generalbackground and indicatesthe overall ‘plan’.Introduces the topicof the researchreport in an engagingmanner whicharouses the reader’sinterest.Gives some generalbackground andindicates the overall’plan’ of the report.Satisfactorilyintroduces thetopic of theresearch report.Gives a generalbackground.Indicates theoverall ‘plan’ ofthe report.Introduces thetopic of theresearch report,but omits ageneralbackground ofthe topic and/orthe overall ‘plan’of the report.Evidence ofResearch/20 marksSubstantial range ofappropriate and current,supportive evidenceGood range ofappropriate andcurrent, supportiveevidence.Suitable rangeof supportiveevidence used.Not alwaysappropriateand/or current.Minimum cited.Insufficient rangeor number ofsupportiveevidence used.Development ofDiscussion/30 marksLogical, insightful, originaldiscussion with wellconnected paragraphs.Evidence of full engagementwith the literature found,with relevant and detailedanalysis.Detailed, originaldiscussion developslogically with someconnection betweenadjoining paragraphs.Understanding ofreading shown. Somerelevant analysis.Adequatediscussiondevelopslogically.Understandingof readingshown. Fewrelevantanalysis.Inadequatediscussion ofissues and/orlacking in logicalflowLittle/nodemonstratedunderstanding ofreading.None/littlediscussion oranalysis.Conclusion/10 marksAn interesting, well writtensummary of the mainpoints.A good summary ofthe main points.Satisfactorysummary of themain points.Poor/no summaryof the mainpoints.HI5019 STRATEGIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS T3 2016An excellent final commenton the subject, based on theinformation provided.A good finalcomment on thesubject, based on theinformation provided.A final commenton the subject,but introducednew material.A poor finalcomment on thesubject and/ornew materialintroduced.Referencing/10 marksCorrect referencing(Harvard)All quoted material inquotes and acknowledged.All paraphrased materialacknowledged.Correctly set out referencelist and bibliographyincluded.Mostly correctreferencing (Harvard)All quoted material inquotes andacknowledged. Allparaphrased materialacknowledged.Mostly correct settingout reference list andbibliographyincluded.Mostly correctreferencing(Harvard) Someproblems withquoted materialandparaphrasedmaterialSome problemswith thereference list orbibliography.Not all materialcorrectlyacknowledged.Some problemswith thereference list orbibliography.Total/100 marksFinal marks/20GeneralComments:

Each student will write a literature review of NOT more than

Each student will write a literature review of NOT more than 1500 words. The review shoulddemonstrate that the student has thoroughly researched their topic. Students should useexamples of business practice from the scholarly journals papers, conferences, books andprofessional magazines to support their argumentsThe literature review would be on accounting software/packages used in Australia. Theresearch would cover history, development and adoption, the current market size, identifythe leaders in the market and what gives them the competitive advantage. Students are alsorequired to identify the current gaps or challenges encountered by users or customers ofaccounting software/packages and make relevant suggestions or recommendations.Research reports are to be presented in hard copy in size 12 Times New Roman or 10 CalibriFont and double spaced. The research should include a list of at least 5 references used inthe research report and a bibliography of the wider reading done to familiarize oneself withthe topic.Submission: Hard-copy to tutors/lecturers assignment box and a copy of the reportgenerated from SAFE ASSIGN attached to it.You are reminded to read the “Plagiarism” section of the course description. Your researchshould be a synthesis of ideas from a variety of sources expressed in your own words.All reports must use the Harvard referencing style. Marking rubrics are attached.HI5019 STRATEGIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS T3 2016Assessment Criteria:Score Very Good Good Satisfactory UnsatisfactoryPresentationand writing style/15 marksInformation is wellorganized. Correct layoutincluding times new roman,font size 12 or calibri, fontsize10, double spaced.About the right length.Very well written, excellentparaphrasing and propergrammar and punctuationare used throughout.Information isorganized, Correctlayout including timesnew roman, font size12 or calibri, fontsize10, doublespaced. About theright length.Well written, someparaphrasing andproper grammar andpunctuationInformation issomewhatorganized,Some elementsof layout orlength incorrect.Proper grammarand punctuationmostly used,but overuse ofdirect quotes.Information ispoorly organized,Some elements oflayout or lengthincorrect.Proper grammarand punctuationnot always used.Excessive overuseof direct quotesIntroduction/15 marksIntroduces the topic of theresearch report in anextremely engaging mannerwhich arouses the reader’sinterest.Gives a detailed generalbackground and indicatesthe overall ‘plan’.Introduces the topicof the researchreport in an engagingmanner whicharouses the reader’sinterest.Gives some generalbackground andindicates the overall’plan’ of the report.Satisfactorilyintroduces thetopic of theresearch report.Gives a generalbackground.Indicates theoverall ‘plan’ ofthe report.Introduces thetopic of theresearch report,but omits ageneralbackground ofthe topic and/orthe overall ‘plan’of the report.Evidence ofResearch/20 marksSubstantial range ofappropriate and current,supportive evidenceGood range ofappropriate andcurrent, supportiveevidence.Suitable rangeof supportiveevidence used.Not alwaysappropriateand/or current.Minimum cited.Insufficient rangeor number ofsupportiveevidence used.Development ofDiscussion/30 marksLogical, insightful, originaldiscussion with wellconnected paragraphs.Evidence of full engagementwith the literature found,with relevant and detailedanalysis.Detailed, originaldiscussion developslogically with someconnection betweenadjoining paragraphs.Understanding ofreading shown. Somerelevant analysis.Adequatediscussiondevelopslogically.Understandingof readingshown. Fewrelevantanalysis.Inadequatediscussion ofissues and/orlacking in logicalflowLittle/nodemonstratedunderstanding ofreading.None/littlediscussion oranalysis.Conclusion/10 marksAn interesting, well writtensummary of the mainpoints.A good summary ofthe main points.Satisfactorysummary of themain points.Poor/no summaryof the mainpoints.HI5019 STRATEGIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS T3 2016An excellent final commenton the subject, based on theinformation provided.A good finalcomment on thesubject, based on theinformation provided.A final commenton the subject,but introducednew material.A poor finalcomment on thesubject and/ornew materialintroduced.Referencing/10 marksCorrect referencing(Harvard)All quoted material inquotes and acknowledged.All paraphrased materialacknowledged.Correctly set out referencelist and bibliographyincluded.Mostly correctreferencing (Harvard)All quoted material inquotes andacknowledged. Allparaphrased materialacknowledged.Mostly correct settingout reference list andbibliographyincluded.Mostly correctreferencing(Harvard) Someproblems withquoted materialandparaphrasedmaterialSome problemswith thereference list orbibliography.Not all materialcorrectlyacknowledged.Some problemswith thereference list orbibliography.Total/100 marksFinal marks/20GeneralComments: