Disabled Americans in the Workplace and Discrimination

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Introduction

The American Constitution provides a detailed framework for supporting all citizens irrespective of gender, age, disability, religion, or ethnicity. However, cases of discrimination are rampant and tend to affect many victims differently. Fortunately, the government has implemented numerous laws and policies to protect this at-risk population in the workplace and take it closer to its objectives. This presentation examines the background and the ethical issues involved in this topic under examination.

Source of Law

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 is the primary law intended to protect the interests of persons with disabilities. This policy is founded on the attributes and ideas associated with the Civil Rights Act. The legislation is intended to promote mechanisms and systems that treat all people equally (Sherbin & Kennedy, 2017). However, some gaps still exist today in different work environments that require evidence-based solutions.

Topic Analysis

The selected topic is that of ADA as a powerful tool for addressing discriminatory tendencies against disabled Americans. The issue revolves around the gains, gaps, and lessons gained so far. The government relies on established systems to punish and fine companies that fail to meet the demands of disabled Americans. The ethical underpinnings associated with ADA are also examined carefully.

Forces and Reasons

The political, social, and economic forces of the 1950s compelled the government to consider superior laws that could take more people closer to their goals (Bonacio et al., 2020). The ideas resonated with the ones outlined in the constitution. A new trend emerged that sought to protect and empower persons with disabilities in the country. The demand for equality and fairness has led to numerous gains for this at-risk group.

Ethical Analysis: Law

The ADA is a powerful policy that meets the demands of ethical principles and laws. For instance, the law compels people to follow the utilitarian principle, do what is right, and maximize happiness for all. The approach improves the rights of the targeted individuals and empowers them to achieve their potential (Sherbin & Kennedy, 2017). The progressive legislation promotes justice and makes it possible for more people to lead high-quality lives. These aspects explain why the government implements powerful initiatives to make it functional.

Ethical Analysis: Topic

The studied topic is relevant since it tackles a critical issue in the workplace. Without the introduced law, more disabled persons will lack job opportunities or be compelled to work in less comfortable environments. They will lack natural support systems and be unable to achieve their potential (Just the facts, 2018). The identified topic is by the ethical principles and ideologies analyzed in class. Those who embrace such attributes will eventually make their companies appropriate for such underserved members of the community.

Notable Cases and Events

The Juan Carlos Gil v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. is a classical case whereby a blind person faced discrimination from a retailing company. This case shows that disabled persons are yet to achieve their potential (Just the facts, 2018). More cases continue to be filed annually whereby different individuals describe the challenges they encounter in their workplaces. Consequently, the Disability Rights Movement is one of the latest events revolving around this problem.

Personal Opinion

The introduction of ADA can be studied as an evidence-based strategy that has empowered more disabled Americans. The law has succeeded in empowering people with disabilities to search for jobs and receive befitting remunerations. This development has addressed most of their challenges, thereby transforming their experiences and life outcomes.

Compliance and Stakeholders

The current situation reveals that most of the stakeholders do not follow the guidelines and regulations outlined in the ADA. This gap explains why some disabled citizens are unable to lead high-quality lives. The American government should liaise with all involved agencies and formulate new strategies for maximizing the benefits of this law (U.S. Department of Labor, n.d.). The approach will guide more citizens to become part of the problem and offer additional support to these members of the population. The ultimate aim is to ensure that more people lead high-quality lives.

Conclusion

The completed presentation has identified workplace discrimination as problematic. The involvement of all key stakeholders will support the demands of these underserved members of society and take them closer to their goals. The consideration of additional ideas and public initiatives will deliver sustainable and ethical solutions.

References

Bonacio, S., Connelly, C. E., Gellatly, I. R., Jetha, A., & Ginis, K. A. M. (2020). The participation of people with disabilities in the workplace across the employment cycle: Employer concerns and research evidence. Journal of Business and Psychology, 35, 135-158.

Just the facts: Americans with Disabilities Act. (2018). United States Courts. Web.

Sherbin, L., & Kennedy, J. T. (2017). The case for improving work for people with disabilities goes way beyond compliance. Harvard Business Review. Web.

U.S. Department of Labor. (n.d.). American with Disabilities Act.

Click Here To Order Now!