Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
This response paper seeks to analyze the results of a study conducted on women with breast cancer. The study sought to determine various dynamics that characterize optimism among women diagnosed with breast cancer. Such research undertakings suffice as correlative as opposed to experimental because they gear towards realization of basic ideals that describe scientific investigations (Crombie, 2012). Investigative studies must adhere to scientific paradigms in order to satisfy procedural and contextual thresholds. It is difficult for researchers to influence or manipulate such studies because different dynamic realities are used in their propagation (Crombie, 2012). In many cases, divergent factors play an important role in determining the outcomes of scientific studies. Inherent fluctuations influence the overall orientation and disposition of scientific research undertakings (Crombie, 2012). In absence of such controls, it would be difficult for experts to rationalize and propagate accurate outcomes. Research studies revolve around credibility, accuracy, and precision. Therefore, it is important for research experts to ensure and guarantee adherence to methodologies and guidelines that define scientific inquiry (Crombie, 2012).
This study covers a pertinent facet with regard to the plight of cancer victims in different social contexts. Its design and propagation exhibits recurrent efforts that seek to establish and demystify realities that cancer patients encounter in modern society (Erban, 2012). The credibility of this exercise is evident because it involved social scientists and experts from diverse scientific areas of interest. Credible research studies should exhibit accuracy, acuity, and precision in order to reflect a representative demeanour (Erban, 2012). However, various discrepancies manifest with regard to the initiation and propagation of research studies. In most cases, researchers exercise restraint whenever they elucidate outcomes that relate to investigative exercises. For instance, they avoid generalizations because they create discrepancies and alter the accuracy of research studies (Erban, 2012). Such efforts require general paradigms such as assumption and selection of representative samples. Devoid of such considerations, it would be difficult for research experts to relay accurate and precise outcomes. Pre-emptive measures support computation of data and relevant information that ultimately adds value to overall research outcomes (Erban, 2012).
This particular study had weaknesses that tilted outcomes and elucidations. For instance, participation was voluntary and researchers had no authority or wherewithal to determine it (Erban, 2012). It was also difficult for researchers to determine or influence accuracy and candour. Such factors affect accuracy and credibility with regard to research outcomes. In this particular study, it was difficult for researchers to convince women to participate. In order to guarantee success in such undertakings, experts should sensitize participants on the need for accuracy and candour in providing information (Erban, 2012).
Although the study was satisfactory and consistent with expectations, it would have obtained better results if more people participated. The relevance of this observation revolves around a recurrent need for accuracy and precision (Gosling, 2010). Another limitation relates to the scope and orientation of the study. It failed to illustrate the inherent relationship between correlation and causation. The study illustrated various aspects of optimism with regard to actual medical procedures involved in cancer treatment. The results failed to show basic existential realities that affect cancer patients (Gosling, 2010). Overly, this research exercise was credible because outcomes were similar to those exhibited by similar scientific exercises. This reality made it a valid representation of factors that affect cancer patients (Gosling, 2010).
References
Crombie, K. (2012). Research in Healthcare: Design, Conduct and Interpretation. London: John Wiley & Sons.
Erban, J. (2012). Breast Cancer: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Diagnosis and Management. Newyork: Demos Medical Publishing.
Gosling, S. (2010). Advanced Methods for Conducting Research Studies. Newyork: CENGAGE.
Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.